Developed Countries

    Executive Summary At our monthly view meeting on Monday, BCA strategists voted to change the House View to a neutral asset allocation stance on equities, with a slight plurality favoring an outright underweight. The view of the Global Investment Strategy service is somewhat more constructive, as I think it is still more likely than not that the US will avoid a recession; and that if a recession does occur, it will be a fairly mild one. Nevertheless, the risks to my view have increased. I now estimate 40% odds of a recession during the next 12 months, up from 20% a month ago. In The Past, When Unemployment Has Started Rising In The US, It Has Kept On Rising Bottom Line: With the S&P 500 down 27% in real terms from its highs at the time of the meeting, the view of the Global Investment Strategy service is that a modest overweight is appropriate. However, investors should refrain from adding to equity positions until more clarity emerges about the path for inflation and growth. Heading For Recession? Every month, BCA strategists hold a view meeting to discuss the most important issues driving the macroeconomy and financial markets. This month’s meeting, which was held yesterday, was especially pertinent as it comes on the heels of a substantial decline in global equities. The key issue that we grappled with was whether the Fed could achieve a proverbial soft landing or whether the US and the rest of the global economy were spiraling towards recession (if it wasn’t already there). I began the meeting by showing one of my favorite charts, a deceptively simple chart of the US unemployment rate (Chart 1). The chart makes three things clear: 1) The US unemployment rate is rarely stable; It is almost always either rising or falling; 2) Once it starts rising, it keeps rising. In fact, the US has never averted a recession when the 3-month average of the unemployment rate has risen by more than a third of a percentage point; and 3) As a mean-reverting series, the unemployment rate is most likely to start rising when it is very low. Chart 1In The Past, When Unemployment Has Started Rising In The US, It Has Kept On Rising Taken at face value, the chart paints a damning picture about the economic outlook. The US unemployment rate is near a record low, which means that it has nowhere to go but up. And once the unemployment rate starts going up, history suggests that a recession is inevitable. Five Caveats Despite this ominous implication, I did highlight five caveats. First, the observation that even a modest increase in the unemployment rate invariably heralds a recession is based on a limited sample of business cycles from the US. Across the G10, soft landings have occurred, Canada being one example (Chart 2). Second, unlike the unemployment rate, the employment-to-population ratio is still 1.1 percentage points below its pre-pandemic level, and 4.6 percentage points below where it was in April 2000. A similar, though less pronounced, pattern holds if one focuses only on the 25-to-54 age cohort (Chart 3). Chart 2G10 Economies Sometimes Manage To Avoid A Recession Amid Rising Unemployment Chart 3The Employment-To-Population Ratio Remains Below Pre-Pandemic Levels   While the number of people not working either because they are worried about the pandemic, or because they are still burning through their stimulus checks, has been trending lower, it is still fairly high in absolute terms (Chart 4). As my colleague Doug Peta discussed in his latest report, one can envision a scenario where job growth remains positive, but the unemployment rate nonetheless edges higher as more workers rejoin the labor force. Chart 4ALabor Supply Should Increase As Covid Fears Continue To Abate And More Workers Burn Through Their Stimulus Savings (I) Chart 4BLabor Supply Should Increase As Covid Fears Continue To Abate And More Workers Burn Through Their Stimulus Savings (II)     Third, the job vacancy rate is extremely high today – much higher than a pre-pandemic “Beveridge Curve” would have predicted (Chart 5). This provides the labor market with a wide moat against an increase in firings. As Fed governor Christopher Waller has emphasized, the main effect of the Federal Reserve’s efforts to cool labor demand could be to push down vacancies rather than to push up unemployment. Fourth, as we have highlighted in past research, the Phillips curve is kinked at very low levels of unemployment (Chart 6). This means that a decline in unemployment from high to moderate levels may do little to spur inflation, but once the unemployment rate falls below its full employment level, then watch out! Chart 5The Fed Hopes That Its Tightening Policy Will Bring Down Job Openings More Than It Pushes Up The Unemployment Rate Chart 6The Phillips Curve Is Kinked At Very Low Levels Of Unemployment   The converse is also true, however. If a small decrease in unemployment can trigger a large increase in inflation, then a small increase in unemployment can trigger a large decrease in inflation, provided that long-term inflation expectations remain reasonably well anchored in the meantime. In other words, it is possible that the so-called “sacrifice ratio” — the amount of output that has to be sacrificed to reduce inflation — may be quite low. Fifth, and perhaps most importantly, there is a lot of variation from one recession to the next in how much unemployment rises. In general, the greater the financial and economic imbalances going into a recession, the deeper it tends to be. US household balance sheets are in reasonably good shape these days. Households are sitting on $2.2 trillion in excess savings (Chart 7). Yes, most of those savings belong to relatively well-off households. But as Chart 8 illustrates, even rich people spend well over half of their income. Chart 7Households Have Only Just Begun To Draw Down Their Accumulated Savings Chart 8Even The Rich Spend The Majority Of Their Income     The ratio of household debt-to-disposable income in the US is down by a third since its peak in 2008. Despite falling equity prices, the ratio of household net worth-to-disposable income is still up nearly 50 percentage points since the end of 2019, mainly because home prices have risen (Chart 9). As is likely to be the case in many other countries, home prices in the US will level off and quite possibly decline over the next few years. In and of itself, that may not be such a bad outcome for equity markets since lower real estate prices will cool aggregate demand, thus lowering inflation without the need for much higher interest rates. The danger, of course, is that we could see a replay of the GFC. This risk cannot be ignored but is probably quite small. The quality of mortgage lending has been very strong over the past 15 years. Moreover, unlike in 2007, when there was a large glut of homes, the homeowner vacancy rate today is at a record low. Tepid homebuilding has pushed the average age of the US residential capital stock to 31 years, the highest since 1948 (Chart 10). Chart 9The US Household Debt Burden Has Come Down Significantly Since 2008, While Net Worth Is Still Higher Than Before The Pandemic Chart 10Tight Supply Conditions In The Housing Market Argue Against A Repeat Of The GFC   A Bleaker Picture Outside The US The situation is admittedly dicier outside the US. Putin’s despotic regime continues to wage war on Ukraine. While European natural gas prices are still well below their March peak, they have recently surged as Russia has begun to throttle natural gas exports (Chart 11). The euro area manufacturing PMI clocked in a respectable 54.6 in May but is likely to drop over the coming months as higher energy prices restrain production. The only saving grace is that fiscal policy in Europe has turned more expansionary. The IMF’s April projection foresaw the structural primary budget balance easing from a surplus of 1.2% of GDP between 2014 and 2019 to a deficit of 1.2% of GDP between 2022 and 2027, the biggest swing among the major economies (Chart 12). Even the IMF’s numbers probably underestimate the fiscal easing that will transpire considering the need for Europe to invest more in energy independence and defense. Chart 11The European Economy Is Threatened By Rising Gas Prices Chart 12Euro Area Fiscal Policy Is Expected To Be More Expansionary In The Years To Come Than Before The Pandemic   The Chinese economy continues to suffer from the “triple threat” of renewed Covid lockdowns, a shift of global demand away from manufactured goods towards services, and a floundering property market. We expect the Chinese property market to ultimately succumb to the same fate that befell Japan 30 years ago. Chart 13Chinese Stocks Are Cheap Unlike Japanese stocks in the early 1990s, however, Chinese stocks are trading at fairly beaten down valuations – 10.9-times earnings and 1.4-times book for the investable index (Chart 13). With the Twentieth Party Congress slated for later this year and the population jaded by lockdowns, the political incentive to shower the economy with cash and loosen the reins on regulation will intensify. A Scenario Analysis For The S&P 500 Corralling all these moving parts is no easy matter. We would put the odds of a US recession over the next 12 months at 40%. This is double what we would have said a month ago when we tactically upgraded stocks after the S&P 500 fell below the 4,000 mark. The May CPI report was clearly a shocker, both to the Fed and the markets. The median dot in the June Summary of Economic Projections sees the Fed funds rate rising to 3.8% next year, smack dab in the middle of our once highly out-of-consensus estimate of 3.5%-to-4% for the neutral rate of interest. With interest rates potentially moving into restrictive territory next year, equity investors are right to be concerned. Yet, as noted above, if a recession does occur, it is likely to be a fairly mild one. At the time of the BCA monthly view meeting, the S&P 500 was already down 23% in nominal terms and 27% in real terms from its peak in early January. We assume that the S&P 500 will fall a further 10% in real terms over the next 12 months in a “mild recession” scenario (30% odds) and by 25% in a “deep recession” scenario (10% odds). Conversely, we assume that the S&P 500 will be 20% higher in 12 months’ time in a “no recession” scenario (60% odds). Note that even in a “no recession” scenario, the real value of the S&P 500 would still be down 12% in June 2023 from its all-time high. On a probability-weighted basis, the expected 12-month real return across all three scenarios works out to 6.5%, or 8% with dividends (Table 1). That is enough to justify a modest overweight in my view – but given the risks, just barely. Investors focused on capital preservation should consider a more conservative stance. Table 1S&P 500 Drawdowns Depending On Whether The US Will Enter A Recession And How Severe It Will Be Most of my colleagues were more cautious than me, as they generally thought that the odds of a recession were greater than 50%. They voted to shift the BCA house view to a neutral asset allocation stance on equities, with a slight plurality favoring an outright underweight (10 for underweight; 9 for neutral; and 6 for overweight). Peter Berezin Chief Global Strategist peterb@bcaresearch.com   Global Investment Strategy View Matrix Special Trade Recommendations Current MacroQuant Model Scores  

Executive Summary Calculating Trend Inflation Investors should anticipate 50 basis point rate hikes at each FOMC meeting, eventually transitioning to 25 bps per meeting once inflation shows clear and convincing evidence of trending down. This transition should occur later this year. Core inflation has peaked for the year and it can fall to a range of 4-5% even in the absence of an economic recession or meaningful labor market weakness. A recession will eventually be required to push inflation from 4% down to the Fed’s 2% target. Economic growth will slow going forward, but we won’t see enough weakness for the Fed to abandon its tightening cycle within the next 6-12 months.       Bottom Line: US bond investors should keep portfolio duration close to benchmark, underweight TIPS versus nominal Treasuries and maintain a defensive posture on corporate bond spreads (underweight IG and neutral HY). The Fed Goes Big Chart 1Inflation Expectations The US Federal Reserve continued to prove its inflation-fighting mettle last week with a 75 basis point rate hike, the largest single-meeting increase since 1994. Chair Powell had initially telegraphed 50 basis point rate increases for both the June and July FOMC meetings, but he made it clear during last week’s press conference that the committee was spooked by May’s surprisingly high CPI number and by the recent jump in 5-10 year household inflation expectations (Chart 1). Alongside the 75 basis point rate hike, committee members revised up their fed funds rate forecasts. The median FOMC member now expects the funds rate to reach a range of 3.25% to 3.5% by the end of 2022. That is consistent with three more 50 basis point rate hikes and one more 25 basis point hike at this year’s four remaining FOMC meetings. Looking further out, the median committee member anticipates 25-50 bps additional upside in the fed funds rate in 2023 but is then forecasting a modest reduction in 2024. Critically, the fed funds rate is still expected to be above estimates of long-run neutral by the end of 2024. Chart 2 shows how current market expectations compare to the Fed’s forecasts. We see that, even after the Fed’s upward forecast revisions, the market still anticipates a somewhat faster pace of tightening this year. The market is also priced for rate cuts in 2023, likely due to the increasingly widespread expectation that a recession is coming within the next 12 months. Chart 2Rate Expectations: Market Versus Fed The Fed’s Near-Term Plan As for what we can expect going forward, we found two comments from Chair Powell’s press conference particularly enlightening. First, he called last week’s 75 basis point rate increase “unusually large” and said that he “doesn’t expect moves of that size to be common.” Second, Powell said that the Committee will need to see “convincing” and “compelling” evidence of falling inflation before it starts to moderate its tightening pace.1 From these statements we deduce the following near-term plan: 1. The Fed’s baseline expectation is to lift rates by 50 bps at each meeting. 2.  A significant upside surprise in either the monthly core CPI data or long-dated inflation expectations would cause the Fed to lift by 75 bps instead of 50 bps. 3.  The Fed will not reduce the pace of tightening to 25 bps per meeting until there is clear and convincing evidence that inflation is trending down. Bottom Line: Investors should anticipate 50 basis point rate hikes at each FOMC meeting, eventually transitioning to 25 bps per meeting once inflation shows clear and convincing evidence of trending down. This transition from 50 bps per meeting to 25 bps per meeting should occur later this year, meaning that the Fed will tighten no more quickly than what is already priced into the yield curve for the remainder of 2022. Inflation: All Clear To 4%, 2% Will Be More Challenging It’s evident from the above discussion that inflation remains the critical input for both monetary policy and US bond yields. In particular, the key questions are: 1. Will inflation trend down, and if so, how quickly? 2. Is an economic recession required to curtail inflation? Our answer to these questions is that core US inflation should fall naturally to a trend rate of roughly 4-5%, even in the absence of recession. However, an economic recession and its associated labor market weakness are likely required to move inflation from 4% back to the Fed’s 2% target. Chart 3Calculating Trend Inflation To arrive at these conclusions, we seek out different ways of estimating inflation’s underlying trend (Chart 3). The first method we consider is the Atlanta Fed’s decomposition of core inflation into “flexible” and “sticky” components. As defined by the Atlanta Fed, “flexible” items tend to change price more frequently compared to “sticky” items. Items like hotels and new & used vehicles fall into the flexible index, while rent and medical care fall into the sticky index.2 As of May, 12-month core flexible inflation is running at a rate of 12.3%. Meanwhile, core sticky inflation is running at 5.0% (Chart 3, top panel). Second, we consider the New York Fed’s Underlying Inflation Gauge (UIG). The UIG uses a dynamic factor model to derive a measure of trend inflation from a broad set of data.3 In total, the measure uses 346 data series encompassing price measures and other nominal, real and financial variables. The New York Fed has demonstrated that the UIG provides better forecasts of CPI inflation than other measures of core and trimmed mean inflation. At present, the UIG is running at 4.9% (Chart 3, panel 2). A second “prices only” UIG measure that includes only price data and no other economic or financial variables is running hotter at 6.0%. Finally, we can assess inflation’s underlying trend by looking at wage growth. Specifically, we can look at unit labor costs, a measure of wages relative to productivity. Unit labor costs are volatile, but they tend to track core inflation over long periods of time. Unit labor costs grew at an extremely high rate of 8.2% in the four quarters ending in Q1, but this is partly due to huge post-pandemic swings in productivity growth. If we create a more stable measure of underlying wage pressure by subtracting annualized 5-year productivity growth from the 12-month growth rate in average hourly earnings, we see that this trend inflation measure is running at only 3.8% (Chart 3, bottom panel). Chart 4Auto Inflation Will Slow We conclude from our analysis that 12-month core CPI inflation will fall from its current 6.0% back down to its trend level of roughly 4-5% without the Fed needing to slam the brakes on economic growth. This will occur because we will finally see the normalization of some prices that were pushed dramatically higher during the pandemic. Auto price inflation, for example, shot up above 20% last year because the pandemic and the fiscal response to the pandemic conspired to cause a surge in auto sales at the same time as a slump in production (Chart 4). Now, for reasons that have nothing to do with monetary policy but everything to do with the waning impact of the pandemic, we see auto sales rolling over as production ramps up. This will push prices lower in the second half of this year. All that said, once core inflation reaches its 4-5% trend level, more economic pain will be required to push it lower. Shelter, for example, carries a huge weight in the Atlanta Fed’s core sticky CPI and it is highly correlated with the economic cycle. A rising unemployment rate, and an economic recession, will eventually be required to push shelter inflation down. Bottom Line: Core inflation has peaked for the year and it can fall to a range of 4-5% even in the absence of an economic recession or meaningful labor market weakness. A recession and a rising unemployment rate will eventually be required to push inflation from 4% down to the Fed’s 2% target. The Risk Of Recession Just because US inflation can fall to 4% in the absence of recession doesn’t mean that the Fed won’t get impatient and cause one anyways. In fact, the Fed made it clear last week that it isn’t interested in nuanced inflation forecasts. The Fed will tighten aggressively until it is apparent that inflation is rolling over, even if it causes economic pain. In this section, we run through several economic and financial market indicators that often send signals near the peak of Fed tightening cycles and in advance of recessions. We conclude that economic growth is slowing, but we do not yet see any evidence of an imminent recession or of any growth slowdown that would be large enough for the Fed to pause or reverse its tightening cycle. First, we look at financial conditions (Chart 5). The Goldman Sachs Financial Conditions Index has tightened rapidly during the past few months and that tightening is broad-based across all five of the index’s components. That said, the index has still not quite moved into “restrictive” territory. Typically, Fed tightening cycles only end once financial conditions are already restrictive, and in this cycle, high inflation means that the Fed will likely tolerate even more tightening of financial conditions than usual. Second, we observe that the end of a Fed tightening cycle is often marked by a dip in the ISM Manufacturing PMI to below 50. Presently, the PMI is a solid 56.1 but it is falling, and regional Fed surveys suggest that it may soon dip into contractionary territory (Chart 6). Chart 5Financial Conditions Chart 6PMIs Are Slowing Third, residential construction activity is a strong predictor of both recession and the end of Fed tightening cycles. Specifically, we have observed that Fed tightening cycles tend to terminate once the 12-month moving average of housing starts falls below the 24-month moving average.4  At present, there is strong evidence that higher mortgage rates are starting to bite the housing market. Housing starts dipped sharply in May and homebuilder confidence is trending down (Chart 7). That said, our housing starts indicator still has a long way to go before it signals the end of the Fed’s tightening cycle (Chart 7, bottom panel). Finally, we turn to the labor market where we do not yet see any evidence of an economic slowdown. Nonfarm payroll growth usually turns negative prior to recession, but right now it is running at a rate of 4.5% during the past 12 months and 3.3% during the past three months (Chart 8). The unemployment rate, for its part, is extremely low, but this only reinforces the idea that the Fed won’t be inclined to abandon its tightening cycle anytime soon. Chart 7US Housing Chart 8The US Labor Market Consider that the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the natural unemployment rate is 4.4% and the median FOMC member estimates that it is 4.0%. In other words, the Fed would still consider the labor market tight even if the unemployment rate rose from its current 3.6% level to around 4%. Even though such an increase in the unemployment rate might technically be consistent with a recession, the Fed would not be inclined to ease monetary policy into such a labor market if inflation is still above its 2% target. Additionally, we must also consider that the labor force participation rate is trending up and it still has breathing room before it reaches its pre-pandemic level. Further increases in labor force participation – which seem likely – could support employment growth going forward even if the unemployment rate stops falling. Bottom Line: The Fed’s rate hikes, and tighter financial conditions more generally, will slow economic growth going forward. However, we don’t see any evidence that growth will be weak enough for the Fed to abandon its tightening cycle within the next 6-12 months. This is especially true because above-target inflation increases the amount of financial conditions tightening and labor market pain that the Fed will tolerate. Investment Implications Portfolio Duration & US Treasury Curve May’s surprisingly elevated CPI number caused US Treasury yields to move above their 2018 peaks across the entire yield curve (Chart 9). But we wouldn’t be surprised to see that uptrend take a breather during the next few months as inflation descends toward its 4-5% underlying trend. As noted above, falling inflation will likely cause the Fed to tighten by no more than what is already discounted between now and the end of the year, this should keep US Treasury yields rangebound. As a result, we advise investors to keep duration close to benchmark in US bond portfolios, with an eye toward re-evaluating this positioning once core inflation moves closer to its underlying trend. Chart 9US Treasury Yields On the Treasury curve, the 5-year note continues to trade cheap relative to the 2-year/10-year slope (Chart 9, bottom panel). We recommend buying the 5-year note versus a duration-matched barbell consisting of the 2-year and 10-year notes. TIPS Chart 10Underweight TIPS Versus Nominals Investors should position for inflation falling back to trend by underweighting TIPS versus duration-matched nominal US Treasuries. Not only will falling inflation weigh on TIPS breakeven inflation rates during the next few months but a resolutely hawkish Fed will also apply downward pressure (Chart 10). We are particularly bearish on short-maturity TIPS, and we advise investors to initiate outright short positions in 2-year TIPS (Chart 10, bottom panel). In last week’s press conference, Chair Powell pointed to negative short-maturity real yields as evidence that financial conditions have room to tighten further. To us, this suggests that the Fed will not quit until real yields move into positive territory across the entire yield curve. In an environment of falling inflation, this is likely to occur because of falling TIPS breakeven inflation rates. However, the Fed has now demonstrated that even if inflation doesn’t fall it will push real yields higher with its policy rate actions and forward guidance. Corporate Credit The combination of slowing economic growth and increasingly restrictive Fed policy compels us toward a defensive positioning on corporate bond spreads. Specifically, we advise investors to carry an underweight (2 out of 5) allocation to investment grade US corporate bonds and a neutral (3 out of 5) allocation to high-yield US corporate bonds. Our slight preference for high-yield comes from the view that spread widening is likely to take a breather this year as inflation turns down and the Fed tightens by no more than what is already discounted in the yield curve. Though the long-run prospects for corporate bond returns remain bleak, if inflation moderates this year as we expect, then spreads could easily re-tighten to the average levels seen during the last tightening cycle (2017-19). That would equate to 31 bps of spread tightening for investment grade US corporate bonds (Chart 11), or roughly 300 bps of excess return versus duration-matched US Treasuries.5 For high-yield, a return to average 2017-19 spread levels would equate to 133 bps of spread tightening (Chart 12), or roughly 875 bps of excess return versus duration-matched US Treasuries.6 Chart 11IG Spreads Chart 12HY Spreads In our view, this warrants a slightly higher allocation to high-yield for the time being, though we will likely turn increasingly bearish should spreads tighten to average 2017-19 levels or once inflation converges with its 4-5% trend.   Ryan Swift US Bond Strategist rswift@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20220615.pdf 2 For more info on the Atlanta Fed’s sticky and flexible CPIs please see: https://www.atlantafed.org/research/inflationproject/stickyprice 3 For more info on the Underlying Inflation Gauge please see https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/policy/underlying-inflation-gauge 4 For more details on this indicator please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “The Bond Market Implications Of A 5% Mortgage Rate”, dated April 26, 2022. 5 This excess return estimate is roughly 31 bps of spread tightening multiplied by average index duration of 7.5. We then add half of the index OAS as an estimate of the carry earned during the next six months. 6 This excess return estimate is roughly 133 bps of spread tightening multiplied by average index duration of 4.3. We then add half of the index OAS, less estimated default losses of 200 bps, as an estimate of the carry earned during the next six months. Recommended Portfolio Specification Other Recommendations Treasury Index Returns Spread Product Returns

Executive Summary Surge In Yields Tanked Equities In this week’s report, we conduct a post-mortem analysis of the past week’s market panic and probe the effect of the new developments on US equities. Inflation is embedded. US equities won’t find a bottom until inflation turns decisively.  The Fed will continue to tighten monetary policy, and rates will rise until inflation rolls over. The Fed “put” is also no longer at play as the Fed has signaled that it cares far more about combating inflation than about the performance of the stock market. Economic growth is decelerating and is already surprising on the downside. Watch rates. With rates stable, the S&P 500 performance will be a function of earnings growth. With rates rising, the multiple will contract and will exacerbate the damage done by the earnings recession. Bottom Line: The S&P 500 is unlikely to find a bottom until inflation turns and monetary conditions stabilize. In addition, economic growth is slowing and an earnings recession is likely. We believe US equities will follow a “fat and down” trajectory in light of the recent developments. We recommend that investors “not be heroes” and keep sector allocation close to the benchmark. Overweight defensives vs. cyclicals. Feature The May CPI reading showed that despite the Fed’s “heroic actions,” inflation has not yet peaked—a data point that has shocked both the market and Fed officials. In an unprecedented move, the Fed, which prides itself on its transparent communication style and its ability to move the market by guiding its expectations, leaked its intention to raise rates by 75 bps to the WSJ despite the communications blackout period. Since last Friday, equity markets around the globe have been in turmoil, with the S&P 500 falling 8%. The NASDAQ is down 7%. Is this just a leg down of the “Fat and Flat” market we have called for with a rebound waiting in the wings, or is there a structural change in the inflationary backdrop and a relentless bear market set to continue? To answer these questions, we will revisit our macroeconomic calls to better understand what expectations need to be adapted to the new reality and what we should expect for US equities over the next three to six months. Sneak Preview: US equities are likely to fall further as monetary conditions continue to tighten and earnings growth is set to contract. We believe that equities will trade in a wide “channel” with multiple rallies and pullbacks, but the general direction is down until inflation turns decisively, and fears of recession dissipate. Why Did Equities Tank? The last few days in the markets were simply brutal. What were investors (and the Fed) panicking about? Here is our hunch: Inflation is not abating, while growth is slowing. Are we in the early innings of stagflation? We believe that stagflation is certainly a high risk. The Fed’s aggressive tightening of monetary conditions is bound to further slow economic growth and taper demand. However, the Fed has no means of controlling the supply side of the equation such as prices of food or energy, which surge because of constrained supply. Will monetary tightening be even more aggressive than expected? Will 75-bps rate rises become the Fed’s new normal? During the press conference, Chairman Powell reassured the market that a 75-bps rate hike is an extraordinary measure. However, both 50-bps and 75-bps rate hikes will be on the table in July. Are the markets on the cusp of a new monetary regime, and is the easy money of the past 12 years a thing of the past? The Fed’s balance sheet has increased from $2 trillion in 2009 to an unprecedented $9 trillion in 2022. This ultra-easy monetary policy has lifted asset values both in private and public markets. The new monetary regime of liquidity being drained from the financial markets to combat inflation is bound to be a major headwind for most asset classes. We believe that it will take a while to bring inflation back to the 2% target, and easy money in the near future is no longer in the cards. It is also unlikely that such a major Fed balance sheet expansion will ever be repeated. The Fed’s tightening via both rising rates and QT will result in a dearth of liquidity in the fixed income space— a credit/counterparty “black swan” may materialize, with MBS most exposed to this risk yet again. Withdrawal of liquidity is a hit to many asset classes, from private markets to unprofitable small-cap growth companies to fixed income markets. This is a serious concern that should be monitored. Incorporating New Data Into Macro And Market Calls We have been writing about these calls for a few months—let’s revisit them here to consider what may have changed recently. Peak Inflation Is Elusive We have never quite bought the argument of transitory inflation. To us, inflation is a product of excessive demand fueled by ultra-easy fiscal and monetary policy and supply chains hobbled by the pandemic. Recently, the situation has been exacerbated by shortages of food and energy. Inflation has spread from pandemic-related goods to “stickier” service items and is broad-based (Chart 1). The wage/price spiral is relentless (Chart 2), as consumer inflation expectations are on the rise, and the job market is on fire. Chart 1Inflation Is Entrenched And Broad-based   While we always believed that it would take inflation a long time to reach the coveted 2% level, we assumed that peak inflation was behind us. Our view that inflation was going to roll over was more down to a base effect rather than the Fed’s actions. In addition, we observed that demand for goods pulled forward by the pandemic had started fading, suppressed by rising prices and negative real wage growth. The Citigroup Inflation Surprise Index had also turned (Chart 3). Chart 2Wage-Price Spiral Is Relentless Chart 3Inflation Was Surprising On The Downside   It is little consolation that we were in good company when rattled by the May headline inflation reading, which came in at 8.5% year on year, and 1% higher than in April. Headline inflation was certainly affected by the price of food and energy, while core inflation was down to a higher price of shelter and goods (Chart 4). While energy is excluded from core inflation, it permeates all aspects of the economy, increasing costs of raw materials, manufacturing, and transportation, which eventually get passed through to the prices of goods and services. The same is the case with the rising wage bill. Chart 4Inflation Picked Up Because Of Prices Of Shelter And Core Goods Importantly, what is next? It would help if US shale producers ramped up production, and the Saudis opened their oil spigots, bringing the price of energy down. Short of that, the price of oil should become a function of a slowing economy and fading demand for goods as interest rates rise (Chart 5). While the Fed has little control over food and energy prices, wage-price dynamics fall squarely in its court. The key channel through which the Fed controls inflation is by cooling the economy and reducing the demand for labor. Rising unemployment is the only way to extinguish inflation in a decisive way. Chart 5Rates Surged Eventually, inflation will turn but it may be in fits and starts, and each data point will have a heavy effect on the pace of monetary tightening and the direction of equity markets, with lower inflation readings igniting rallies and higher readings triggering sell-offs. Inflation is embedded. Of course, sooner or later, it will abate but until then we expect a much more aggressive monetary policy. Monetary Conditions Have Tightened Dramatically As we summarized in our “Market Capitulation Scorecard,” one of the key conditions of an equity market bottom, and potentially, even a sustainable rebound, is stabilization in monetary conditions. We hypothesized that this could happen as the Fed tightens monetary conditions and growth slows and inflation turns, pulling down long rates. We also believed that the market focus is going to start shifting away from concerns about inflation to concerns about economic growth. Friday’s inflation reading has changed that – now investors worry about inflation and growth. Rates have initially skyrocketed, with the 10-year Treasury yield moving by 30bps points over the course of three days from 3.18 to 3.48. Real rates increased from 0.38% to 0.63%. US financial conditions have tightened sharply (Chart 6), moving to the neutral level.   What’s next is the most difficult question of this report. It is likely this fast and furious move in rates has accomplished in five days what usually takes weeks. Tighter monetary policy, as it stands now, until more data comes in, is priced in. These moves capture changes in dot-plot expectations revised by the Fed, with the peak rate moving from around 3% to 4%. And, of course, that move got priced into the equity space with the S&P 500 pulling back sharply (Chart 7). Chart 6Financial Conditions Are Moving Into Restrictive Territory Chart 7Surge In Yields Tanked Equities The Fed will continue to tighten monetary policy and rates will rise until inflation rolls over. However, once inflation abates, long rates are likely to stabilize, signaling slower growth ahead. The Fed Won’t Come To The Rescue The Fed “put” is no longer at play as the Fed has signaled that it cares far more about combating inflation than the performance of the stock market. In fact, falling equities will play into Powell’s hand as a negative wealth effect is likely to put a lid on inflationary pressures, with wealthier Americans paying the toll. Kansas City Fed President Esther George, the only member of the FOMC that voted against a 75bps rate hike in the June meeting (she was in favor of 50 bps) said in May: “The Federal Reserve is not targeting equity markets in its battle against inflation, but that is "one of the avenues" where the impact of tighter monetary policy will be felt".1 Further, the Fed is very concerned about a recent pick-up in the long-term consumer inflation expectations (Chart 8) and will likely err on the side of caution to manage these expectations and avoid a self-fulfilling prophecy. Chart 8The Fed Is Worried About Inflation Expectations Economic Growth Is Slowing Fast, Both At Home And Abroad A tighter monetary policy is designed to slow economic growth. The World Bank has downgraded global GDP growth expectations from 4.1% to 2.9%, and import volumes are declining. The Atlanta GDPNow forecast is hovering around zero (Chart 9). The Philly Fed survey has just crossed into negative territory (Chart 10). Retail sales are contracting both in nominal and real terms. According to the Citi Economic Surprise Index, economic growth is surprising on the downside (Chart 11). While the probability of a recession has picked up over the past few weeks, it is earnings growth disappointment that will have an adverse effect on equities in the near term. Chart 9Consensus Expectation Are Still Too High Chart 10Many Signs That Economy Is Slowing Sharply Chart 11Economic Growth Disappoints   We maintain our view that economic growth is decelerating and is already surprising on the downside. Earnings Growth Will Contract And Take The Market With It       We stated in last week’s “Is An Earnings Recession In The Cards?” report that this year’s sell-off has been triggered by fears of an aggressive Fed, tighter monetary policy, and rising rates. However, the decom- position of the total return demonstrates that the pullback was all about multiple contraction, while strong earnings growth helped absorb the blow. We hypothesized that the multiple contraction phase is complete and that the next leg of the bear market will be all about growth, and earnings growth in particular (Chart 12). Hence if rates stabilize, then multiples will stay at the current level, and returns will be a function of earnings growth. However, the 10-year Treasury rate increasing from 3.18 has resulted in the S&P 500 multiple contracting from 16.7 to 15.6 over the course of just three days, while earnings growth expectations have remained mostly intact. Currently, according to our very simple model (Chart 13), a 3.5% 10-year Treasury yield corresponds to the S&P 500 forward multiple of 16.8x, which is close to where the S&P 500 stands today. If rates rise further, the forward multiple will fall. Chart 12Multiple Contraction Will Be Followed By Earnings Growth Deceleration Chart 13Higher Rates Translate Into Lower Equity Multiples Our earnings growth model predicts that earnings growth will trend towards zero over the next three months (Chart 14). Chart 14Earnings Growth Will Trend To Zero And Then Contract Our scenario analysis matrix shows that if multiples stay stable around 17x forward earnings, while earnings contract by zero to five percent next quarter, the index will be flat to slightly down (Table 1). Broadly speaking, with a stable multiple, the market will move in line with earnings growth. If rates continue to rise and the multiple falls to 16x, going another 11% down is likely. Table 1The S&P 500 Target Scenario Analysis Watch rates. With rates stable, the S&P 500 performance will be a function of earnings growth, and the market is likely to be range-bound. With rates rising, a multiple will contract further, and equities will fall. Investment Implications: “Fat And Down” The SPX has discounted plenty of negative news now that it is officially in bear market territory. However, we believe that the S&P 500 is not yet close to the bottom. The market is again pricing in tighter monetary policy and rising rates, which is accompanied by multiple contraction. It is hard to see equities bottoming without inflation peaking. In addition, we are predicting that the next leg of the bear market will be driven by earnings growth, which is likely to contract due to an economic slowdown both at home and abroad. As such, “fat and down” may be a more likely outcome than just “fat and flat.” Bottom Line Equities will move in a wide range over the next three to six months. However, if rates are to rise further and earnings growth is to contract, they may be trading in a downward sloping “channel,” or “fat and down.” We recommend that investors “not be heroes” and keep sector allocation close to the benchmark. Overweight defensives vs. cyclicals.     Irene Tunkel Chief Strategist, US Equity Strategy irene.tunkel@bcaresearch.com     Footnotes 1     https://www.reuters.com/business/feds-george-policy-not-aimed-equity-markets-though-it-will-be-felt-there-cnbc-2022-05-19/#:~:text=WASHINGTON%2C%20May%2019%20(Reuters),Esther%20George%20said%20on%20Thursday.   Recommended Allocation Recommended Allocation: Addendum