Emerging Markets

Highlights U.S. Treasuries - Fair Value: The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield now appears 7 bps expensive on our model. Investors should maintain below-benchmark duration and continue to monitor bullish sentiment toward the U.S. dollar for signals about the breadth of the global economic recovery. U.S. Treasuries - Technicals: Large net short bond positions are in the process of being unwound. A more balanced technical picture removes one of the key impediments to the bond bear market and possibly sets the stage for another leg higher in yields. China: Chinese monetary policy that is sufficiently accommodative to spur economic growth, but not so accommodative that it causes undue strength in the trade-weighted U.S. dollar, is the most bearish outcome for U.S. bonds. Feature Bonds rallied strongly late last week without any obvious economic catalyst. Now that the dust has settled we find the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield trading at 2.34%, 7 bps below our estimate of fair value (Chart 1). Chart 12-Factor U.S. Treasury Model 2-Factor U.S. Treasury Model 2-Factor U.S. Treasury Model Updating Our U.S. Treasury Model That fair value estimate comes from our 2-factor U.S. Treasury model, based on the Global Manufacturing PMI and bullish sentiment toward the U.S. dollar. In our view, these two factors capture the most important macro drivers of U.S. bond yields. Stronger global growth, as proxied by the Global Manufacturing PMI, tends to push yields higher. However, to the extent that stronger global growth coincides with an appreciating U.S. dollar, the amount of monetary tightening that needs to be achieved through higher interest rates is limited. This caps the upside in long-dated U.S. bond yields. Put differently, it is not just the magnitude of the global growth impulse that matters for U.S. bond yields, but also the breadth of the recovery. The more broad-based the recovery, the less upward pressure on the U.S. dollar and the higher U.S. Treasury yields can rise. Last week we received Flash PMI estimates for the U.S., Eurozone and Japan that we can use to estimate the Global PMI for February. According to the Flash estimates, the U.S. PMI declined slightly in February, but this was more than offset by accelerations in both the Eurozone and Japan. Altogether, these three regions account for 48% of the Global PMI and, assuming PMIs in all other countries remain flat, we can calculate that the global PMI will nudge higher from 52.7 in January to 52.9 in February. Of course one month of data is much less important than the longer run trend. Taking a step back, we see that manufacturing PMIs are trending higher in every major economic bloc (Chart 2). Our diffusion index also shows that the global manufacturing recovery is more broadly based than at any time during the past three years (Chart 2, top panel). The synchronized nature of the recovery is also reflected in the behavior of the U.S. dollar, which has not appreciated during the past month even though Fed rate hike expectations have shifted up (Chart 3). The message from the survey of bullish dollar sentiment - the series that is included in our Treasury model - is more mixed. Bullish dollar sentiment plunged from elevated levels in January but has recovered somewhat during the past few weeks (Chart 3, panel 2). Meantime, U.S. Treasury spreads over German bunds and JGBs are also sending mixed signals. Short-maturity spreads have widened alongside increased U.S. rate hike expectations, while long-maturity spreads have been well contained (Chart 3, bottom 2 panels). Chart 2Synchronized Global Recovery Synchronized Global Recovery Synchronized Global Recovery Chart 3Keep Watching The Dollar Keep Watching The Dollar Keep Watching The Dollar Global bond investors should closely monitor trends in the U.S. dollar, bullish sentiment toward the dollar, and U.S. Treasury spreads over bunds and JGBs. Each of these indicators provides information about the breadth of the economic recovery. If Fed rate hike expectations remain firm, or even move higher, and that trend is not matched by a stronger dollar or wider Treasury spreads, then that would signal that the global recovery is becoming more synchronized, suggesting additional upside for bond yields. Bottom Line: The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield now appears 7 bps expensive on our model. Investors should maintain below-benchmark duration and continue to monitor bullish sentiment toward the U.S. dollar for signals about the breadth of the global economic recovery. Chart 4Positioning Becoming More Balanced Positioning Becoming More Balanced Positioning Becoming More Balanced Treasury Technicals Less Stretched This brings us back to last Friday's bond rally. Puzzlingly, the 2-year U.S. Treasury yield declined 6 bps and the 10-year yield fell 7 bps on a day without any significant economic or political news. In fact, Treasury yields managed to decline even though rate hike expectations embedded in the overnight index swap curve were unchanged and the probability of a March rate hike priced into fed funds futures actually increased from 31% to 33%! The unusual disconnect between Treasury yields and rate hike expectations is probably related to the expiry of the March bond futures contracts. Last week, traders had to decide whether to let their March contracts expire or roll them over into June. Positioning data show that speculators carried large net short positions into last week (Chart 4), so it is possible that it was the capitulation of these large short positions that drove yields lower on Friday. More timely data from the skew between payer and receiver swaptions show that swaption investors are no longer betting on rising rates (Chart 4, panel 4). Net speculative positions in Treasury futures could follow suit when the data are released later this week. In addition, our composite sentiment indicator has just recently ticked back above the zero line (Chart 4, panel 2). Bottom Line: Large net short bond positions are in the process of being unwound. A more balanced technical picture removes one of the key impediments to the bond bear market, and possibly sets the stage for another leg higher in yields. China's Bond Market Balancing Act Chart 5Easy Money Spurs Chinese Growth Easy Money Spurs Chinese Growth Easy Money Spurs Chinese Growth In the context of the 2-factor U.S. Treasury model presented above, there are two reasons why developments in China matter for U.S. bond markets. The first is that China accounts for the single largest weighting in the Global Manufacturing PMI, so stronger growth in the Chinese manufacturing sector will pressure bond yields higher, all else equal. But the Chinese economy can also influence U.S. bond yields if changes in the RMB exert meaningful influence on the trade-weighted U.S. dollar. For example, faster Chinese growth pressures U.S. bond yields higher, but some of that upward pressure could be mitigated if that strong growth is engineered through a rapid depreciation of the RMB relative to the U.S. dollar. On the first point, China's manufacturing PMI is in a clear uptrend although the recent contraction in the government's fiscal expenditures is a potential warning sign (Chart 5). Our China Investment Strategy service views the fiscal contraction as a risk but still expects the Chinese economy to remain buoyant this year.1 This is because Chinese monetary conditions remain supportive of further gains in the manufacturing sector, and the rebound in China's PMI that began early last year is more tied to easing monetary conditions - a weaker exchange rate and falling real interest rates - than to increased fiscal spending. On the second point, while a weaker trade-weighted RMB has helped spur the recovery in Chinese manufacturing, the impulse from a weaker RMB has so far not been potent enough to move the needle on the trade-weighted U.S. dollar (Chart 6). From the perspective of U.S. fixed income markets a continuation of this trend would be the most bond-bearish outcome. Chinese monetary policy remains easy enough to spur economic growth but not so easy that it causes the U.S. dollar to spike. For the time being at least, China has been actively selling Treasuries in order to mitigate the extent of its currency depreciation (Chart 7). If China were to suddenly stop selling Treasuries, then the RMB would likely depreciate sharply. This would actually have an ambiguous impact on U.S. Treasury yields since it would probably lead to both a stronger U.S. dollar and faster global growth. Chart 6USD So Far Not Impacted By RMB USD So Far Not Impacted By RMB USD So Far Not Impacted By RMB Chart 7China Is A Treasury Seller China Is A Treasury Seller China Is A Treasury Seller More likely, however, is that China will continue to manage the gradual depreciation of its currency unless it is forced to take more dramatic action in the face of a negative growth shock. Our China Investment Strategy team notes that the annual People's Congress in early March should offer some important clues about the Chinese government's growth priorities and policy direction going forward. Bottom Line: Chinese monetary policy that is sufficiently accommodative to spur economic growth, but not so accommodative that it causes undue strength in the trade-weighted U.S. dollar, is the most bearish outcome for U.S. bonds. Ryan Swift, Vice President U.S. Bond Strategy rswift@bcaresearch.com 1 Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "Be Aware Of China's Fiscal Tightening", dated February 16, 2017, available at cis.bcaresearch.com Fixed Income Sector Performance Recommended Portfolio Specification

Highlights There is little evidence of a major "credit bubble" in China. Rising debt is largely the consequence of the country's high saving rate. This has mixed implications for global bonds: On the one hand, an exaggerated fear of a hard landing in China has kept global bond yields below where they would otherwise be; on the other hand, high levels of Chinese savings will continue to weigh on real long-term yields. The real trade-weighted RMB will depreciate by a further 3%-to-5% over the next 12 months, with the bulk of the decline coming against the U.S. dollar. Chinese shares are still attractive at current valuation levels. Go long the H-share market versus the MSCI EM index. We are booking a loss of 10% on our NASDAQ hedge. Feature Indefatigable The global economy remains in recovery mode. As we discussed last week, leading indicators point to strong global growth and accelerating earnings over the next six months.1 This justifies a cyclically overweight tilt towards global equities. Still, we worry that equity markets have gotten ahead of themselves. We thought that the backup in yields late last year, along with Trump's protectionist rhetoric, would cause stocks to correct to the downside, at least temporarily. Instead, they ripped higher, causing our short NASDAQ hedge trade to briefly go through its 10% stop loss on Wednesday. Our technical indicators continue to point to heightened risks of a correction. Whether such a correction proves to be the proverbial "buying opportunity" - our baseline view - or morphs into something more ominous will depend on the durability of the economic backdrop. We discussed some of the risks around Europe and the U.S. last week. This week we turn to China. The China Question Recent Chinese economic data have been fairly solid and our China analysts expect that growth momentum will be sustained over the coming months.2 Nevertheless, there are plenty of clouds on the horizon. Direct fiscal spending has slowed sharply over the past 12 months. In addition, a crackdown on property speculation last year has led to a deceleration in home price inflation, which could adversely affect household spending and construction later this year. Then, of course, there is all that debt. There is no shortage of commentators who argue that China is experiencing a full-blown credit bubble. Others contend that rising debt in China is largely a manifestation of a chronic excess of domestic savings. Knowing which side is correct is critical for investors. If China is in the midst of a massive credit bubble, then it is natural to fear that this bubble will burst fairly soon. This could prove to be devastating to global financial markets. In contrast, if rising debt in China mainly reflects an overabundance of savings, then it is possible that debt will continue rising until those savings dissipate - something that may not happen for many years. We won't beat around the bush. Our view is that rising debt in China has largely been the result of excess savings. This implies that a financial crisis in China is unlikely anytime soon. That does not mean that China will cease being a source of occasional investor angst. But if another major global recession is coming, it will not be because of China. The Debt-Savings Tango Endless ink has been spilled on the question of whether savings create bank credit or bank credit creates savings. In reality, the answer is "both": Just like income can create spending and spending can create income, savings can create debt and vice versa. If an economy is operating at less than full employment, the decision by banks to extend new credit is likely to boost aggregate demand, leading to more hiring. This will raise household disposable income and potentially lift aggregate savings.3 On the flipside, if households decide to save a bit more, this will push down real interest rates. That, in turn, could entice firms to increase how much they borrow and invest. Debt creates savings, and savings create debt; it's a two-way street. Admittedly, thinking through the specific forces underlying the relationship between debt and savings is one of those things that can make your head spin. Thus, it is worthwhile to go through a few simple examples in order to elucidate the principles at work. With this knowledge in hand, we will be able to debunk many of the fallacies that investors routinely succumb to. Cuckoo For Coconuts: How To Think About Debt And Savings Imagine a small island economy consisting of 100 people, each of whom toils away producing 100 coconuts every year, resulting in annual GDP of 10,000 coconuts. Consider the following five examples, summarized in Table 1: Table 1Cuckoo For Coconuts: Debt Creates Savings, Savings Create Debt Does China Have A Debt Problem Or A Savings Problem? Does China Have A Debt Problem Or A Savings Problem? Example #1: Each person consumes 100 coconuts. As a result, a total of 10,000 coconuts are consumed. Total savings is zero, as is total investment. No debt is created. Example #2: Each person consumes only 75 coconuts, selling the other 25 coconuts to a nearby plantation. The plantation buys these coconuts with the help of a bank loan and plants them, resulting in 2,500 new coconut trees. Total consumption falls to 7,500. Savings and investment equals 2,500 coconuts. 2,500 coconuts worth of bank loans are created. Notice that higher savings have led to more debt. Example #3: Same as Example 2, but now instead of selling the excess coconuts to a nearby plantation, they are exported abroad. Savings equal 2,500 coconuts, investment is zero, and the current account surplus is 2,500. The island accumulates 2,500 coconuts worth of foreign assets. The lesson here is that if a country can export some of its excess savings abroad, debt may not need to rise by as much as if the savings had to be intermediated by the domestic financial system. Note also that this example reveals the famous economic identity: S-I=CA. Example #4: Each person consumes 125 coconuts, made possible by importing 25 coconuts per person. Consumption now equals 12,500 coconuts. Savings equal -2,500 coconuts, investment is zero, and the current account deficit is 2,500. The island takes on 2,500 coconuts worth of external debt. Example #5: Half the island's residents consume 75 coconuts each, while the other half consumes 125 coconuts each. Those who consume 75 coconuts sell their surplus nuts on the open market, placing the proceeds in a bank. The bank lends out these savings to the other half of the population. Net savings and investment is zero. However, 1,250 coconuts worth of new bank loans are created. Debt Puzzles The key idea stemming from these examples is that debt is often formed when there is a persistent divergence between spending and income.4 This is true for the economy as a whole, as well as for its individual constituents (households, firms, and the government). Understanding this point helps resolve a number of seeming puzzles. For instance, it is sometimes alleged that China's debt buildup cannot be the result of the country's high saving rate because U.S. debt also rose rapidly in the years leading up to the financial crisis, an era during which the U.S. national saving rate was very low. Our simple examples demonstrate why this is a misleading argument. Examples 2, 4, and 5 show that debt levels will rise regardless of whether income exceeds spending or spending exceeds income. It is the absolute difference between the two that matters, not whether the residual is positive or negative. In Example 2, which is applicable to China today, households spend less than they earn. The resulting savings are intermediated by the financial system and transformed into investment, creating new debt along the way. In Example 4, which is applicable to the U.S. before the financial crisis, households spend more than they earn, leading them to take on new debt in order to finance imports. The increase in debt may get amplified, as in Example 5, if some households save while others dissave. As discussed in Box 1, Example 5 also helps explain why inequality and debt levels tend to rise and fall together over time. The Future Of Chinese Household Savings Chinese household savings now stand at nearly 40% of disposable income, notably higher than in other major developed and emerging economies. The increase in China's household savings, along with a widening gap between rich and poor, have been important drivers of faster debt growth (Chart 1). As time goes by, China's household saving rate will begin to decline due to the aging of its population, the expansion of household credit, and the emergence of a stronger "consumer culture." Yet, that shift is likely to be a gradual one. Progress in building out a social safety net has been painfully slow. This has forced households to maintain high levels of precautionary savings. The share of China's population in its 'prime savings years' (between the ages of 30-and-59) will also continue to increase over the next 15 years, which should support an elevated saving rate (Chart 2). Chart 1China: Higher Saving Rate And ##br##Inequality Went Hand In Hand With Debt Growth China: Higher Saving Rate And Inequality Went Hand In Hand With Debt Growth China: Higher Saving Rate And Inequality Went Hand In Hand With Debt Growth Chart 2China: Share Of Population In Its High ##br##Saving Years Has Not Yet Peaked China: Share Of Population In Its High Saving Years Has Not Yet Peaked China: Share Of Population In Its High Saving Years Has Not Yet Peaked In addition, sky-high property prices have forced young people to save a large fraction of their incomes in order to have any hope of owning a home. This is particularly true for men. Brides are in short supply in China. The saving rate among single-child households with one son is about four percentage points higher in rural areas and two percentage points higher in urban areas, compared to single-child households with one daughter. One academic study concluded that about half of the increase in China's household saving rate since the late-1970s could be attributed to this factor.5 Unfortunately, this problem is not going to go away anytime soon. The ratio of men between the ages of 25-and-39 and women between the ages of 20-and-34 - a proxy for gender imbalances in the marriage market - will surge from 1.06 at present to 1.35 by the middle of the next decade (Chart 3). What do countries with surplus savings and surplus men tend to do? Historically, the answer is that they have sent them off to fight. China's military spending has grown by leaps and bounds over the past decade (Chart 4). This trend is bound to continue, making East Asia an increasingly likely setting for future military conflicts.6 Chart 3A Shortage Of Chinese Brides A Shortage Of Chinese Brides A Shortage Of Chinese Brides Chart 4China: A Lot Of Dry Powder China: A Lot Of Dry Powder China: A Lot Of Dry Powder Understanding Chinese Corporate Debt Dynamics Chart 5China: State-Owned Companies Are ##br##Not The Only Ones With Access To Cheap Financing Does China Have A Debt Problem Or A Savings Problem? Does China Have A Debt Problem Or A Savings Problem? Many companies around the world rely heavily on retained earnings and equity sales to finance new investment projects. When this happens, investment can take place without the need for the creation of new debt. China has its fair share of consistently profitable companies that fund capital expenditures using internally generated funds, while tapping the equity markets as necessary to finance larger projects. However, the country is also awash with companies that are in constant need of debt financing. Perhaps not surprisingly, the former tend to be private firms while the latter are often state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Pundits like to assert that the secret to boosting growth in China is to wean these money-losing public companies off cheap credit, forcing them to cut back on production and capital spending. This will allow scarce economic resources to migrate to better-managed firms that will use them more wisely. But is this really a sensible assumption? What exactly is the evidence that China's well-run private companies have been starved of credit because most of it is flowing to money-losing companies? The data does not fit this "crowding out" story at all (Chart 5). The Japan Analogy A more sensible narrative is that the Chinese government has been prodding state-owned banks into lending money to state-owned companies and local governments in order to support aggregate demand and keep unemployment from rising. The experience of Japan is instructive here. Starting in the early 1990s, Japan entered an extended era where the private sector was trying to spend less than it earned (Chart 6). In order to keep unemployment from rising, the Japanese government was forced to try to export these excess savings abroad via a current account surplus or, failing that, absorb them with dissavings from the public sector. While Japan was able to lift its current account surplus from 1.4% of GDP in 1990 to 3% of GDP in 1998, this was not enough to fully offset the surge in desired private-sector savings. This necessitated the government to run large budget deficits. The same sort of fiscal trap now stalks China. Up until the Great Recession, China was able to export much of its excess savings. The current account surplus hit a record high of nearly 10% of GDP in 2007. In effect, China was doing what the islanders in Example 3 were able to do. The subsequent appreciation of the RMB undermined this strategy, forcing the government to take steps to boost domestic demand. It is no surprise that China's debt stock began to grow rapidly just as its current account surplus started to dwindle (Chart 7). Chart 6Japan Relied On Fiscal Largess And Current Account Surpluses To Offset The Rise In Private-Sector Savings Japan Relied On Fiscal Largess And Current Account Surpluses To Offset The Rise In Private-Sector Savings Japan Relied On Fiscal Largess And Current Account Surpluses To Offset The Rise In Private-Sector Savings Chart 7China: Debt Increased When Current ##br##Account Surplus Began Its Descent China: Debt Increased When Current Account Surplus Began Its Descent China: Debt Increased When Current Account Surplus Began Its Descent Keep in mind that fiscal policy in China entails much more than adjustments to government spending and taxes. Central government spending accounts for a fairly small share of GDP. The vast majority of fiscal stimulus is done via the banking system. This makes Chinese fiscal policy nearly indistinguishable from credit policy. Chart 8Chinese Private Firms: Liabilities-To-Assets Trending##br## Lower For A Decade Chinese Private Firms: Liabilities-To-Assets Trending Lower For A Decade Chinese Private Firms: Liabilities-To-Assets Trending Lower For A Decade From this perspective, China's so-called "debt mountain" is not much different from Japan's debt mountain once we acknowledge that the bulk of China's corporate debt in China is, in fact, quasi-fiscal debt. As evidence, note that in sharp contrast to the SOE sector, the ratio of liabilities-to-assets among private Chinese companies has actually been trending lower over the past decade (Chart 8). Yes, many of the investment projects undertaken by SOEs and local governments are of questionable economic merit. But that's beside the point. China's money-losing SOEs are the equivalent of Japan's fabled "bridges to nowhere." From the Chinese government's point of view, an SOE that is producing something is still preferable to one that is producing nothing. The ever-rising debt burden that these state-owned firms must carry to cover operating losses and finance new investment is just the price the government must pay to keep the economy afloat. Little Evidence Of A Genuine Credit Bubble Genuine credit bubbles tend to happen during periods of euphoria. U.S., Spanish, and Irish banks all traded at lofty multiples to book value on the eve of the financial crisis, having massively outperformed their respective indices in the preceding years. That's obviously not the case for Chinese banks today, which remain one of the most loathed sectors of the global equity market (Chart 9). The U.S., Spanish, and Irish housing booms also occurred alongside ballooning current account deficits, something that doesn't apply to China (Chart 10). One can debate whether China is in the midst of a property bubble, but even if it is, it looks a lot more like the one Hong Kong experienced in the late 1990s. When that bubble burst, property prices plummeted by 70%. Yet, Hong Kong banks were barely affected (Chart 11). Chart 9Chinese Banks: Unloved And Unwanted Chinese Banks: Unloved And Unwanted Chinese Banks: Unloved And Unwanted Chart 10Recent Credit Bubbles Developed ##br##Amid Widening Current Account Deficits Recent Credit Bubbles Developed Amid Widening Current Account Deficits Recent Credit Bubbles Developed Amid Widening Current Account Deficits Chart 11Hong Kong Is The Correct Analogy Hong Kong Is The Correct Analogy Hong Kong Is The Correct Analogy There is a lot of debt in China. However, most of it has not been centered on the property market (Chart 12). Rather, just as in Japan, debt has served a fiscal purpose - it has been used to absorb the excess savings of the private sector, so as to keep unemployment from rising. Chart 13 shows that national saving rates and debt-to-GDP ratios are positively correlated across emerging economies. China sits close to the trend line, suggesting that its debt stock is roughly what you would expect it to be. Chart 12Chinese Debt: Not Predominately ##br##Tied To The Property Market Chinese Debt: Not Predominately Tied To The Property Market Chinese Debt: Not Predominately Tied To The Property Market Chart 13Positive Correlation Between National Savings And Indebtedness Does China Have A Debt Problem Or A Savings Problem? Does China Have A Debt Problem Or A Savings Problem? Investment Conclusions Where does this leave investors? For global bonds, the implications of our analysis are somewhat mixed. On the one hand, the high probability that the Chinese government can maintain the status quo of continued credit expansion for the foreseeable future means that a hard landing for the economy - and the associated drop in safe-haven developed economy government bond yields that this would trigger - is unlikely to occur. On the other hand, high levels of Chinese savings will continue to fuel the global savings glut, keeping real long-term bond yields lower than they would otherwise be. On balance, investors should maintain a modest underweight allocation toward global bonds. Our analysis does not warrant either a very bearish or very bullish stance towards the RMB. Granted, a banking crisis could prompt Chinese savers to look for ways to move more of their money overseas, leading to further capital flight and a tumbling currency. As noted, however, such an outcome is not in the cards. On the flipside, a chronic shortfall of domestic demand will keep the pressure on the government to try to export excess production abroad by running a larger current account surplus. As we foretold in our March 2015 report "A Weaker RMB Ahead," this will push the authorities to weaken the currency.7 We expect the real trade-weighted RMB to depreciate by a further 3%-to-5% over the next 12 months, with the bulk of the decline coming against the U.S. dollar. If China averts a debt crisis, that's good news for global equities. In the developed market universe, Europe and Japan stand to benefit the most, given the cyclical bent of their stock markets. We are overweight both regions (currency hedged). Despite a weak start to the year, both markets have outperformed the U.S. in local-currency terms since bottoming last summer, a trend we expect will resume over the coming months (Chart 14). What about Chinese shares specifically? Clearly, there are many risks facing the Chinese economy that transcend debt worries, a possible trade war with the U.S. being the prominent example. Yet, considering that Chinese stocks trade at fairly cheap valuation levels, our sense is that these risks have been more than fully priced in by investors. With this in mind, we are going long Chinese H-shares relative to the overall EM basket.8 Chart 15 shows that H-shares now trade at a substantial discount to the EM index. Chart 14Euro Area And Japan: Rebound Will Continue Euro Area And Japan: Rebound Will Continue Euro Area And Japan: Rebound Will Continue Chart 15Chinese Investable Stocks Are Cheap Chinese Investable Stocks Are Cheap Chinese Investable Stocks Are Cheap Finally, one housekeeping note: Since we already have exposure to the H-share market via our strategic recommendation to be long China/Europe/Japan versus the U.S., we are closing that trade and opening a new one that is simply long Europe and Japan versus the U.S. Peter Berezin, Senior Vice President Global Investment Strategy peterb@bcaresearch.com Box 1: Debt And Inequality Chart 16U.S.: Positive Correlation Between ##br##Income Inequality And Debt-To-GDP U.S.: Positive Correlation Between Income Inequality And Debt-To-GDP U.S.: Positive Correlation Between Income Inequality And Debt-To-GDP Income inequality and the ratio of private debt-to-GDP have been positively correlated in the U.S. over the past century (Chart 16). The existence of this relationship is not merely due to a third factor: economic growth. Growth was strong in the 1920 and 1980s/90s - two periods of rapidly increasingly inequality - but it was also strong during the 1960s, a decade when inequality was falling. Our analysis helps shed light on this relationship. Return to Example 5, but this time assume that each resident consumes 100 coconuts, with half the population producing 75 coconuts and the other half producing 125 coconuts. 10,000 coconuts are still produced and consumed in aggregate, resulting in no net savings. But because half the population is borrowing money to acquire coconuts from the other half, debt levels still rise. Higher inequality leads to more debt. To be sure, the correlation between inequality and debt runs in both directions. Rising debt has historically led to an expansion of the financial sector. This has helped enrich Wall Street elites. In this way, rising debt can exacerbate inequality. On the flipside, rising income inequality entails a shift of income from poorer households - with high marginal propensities to consume - to richer ones - who generally save a large fraction of their income. This tends to reduce aggregate demand. Lower aggregate demand, in turn, leads to lower real rates, making it easier for poorer households to load up on debt and live beyond their means. 1 Please see Global Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "The Reflation Trade Rumbles On," dated February 17, 2017, available at gis.bcaresearch.com. 2 Please see China Investment Strategy, "Be Aware Of China's Fiscal Tightening," dated February 16, 2017, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. 3 A few technical caveats are in order. Think of a simple closed-economy "Keynesian" model where aggregate demand determines income and where savings (S), by definition, are equal to investment (I). In this model, investment is usually treated as exogenous. Thus, if increased bank credit is used to finance new investment projects, this will also translate into higher savings (i.e., if "I" goes up, "S" must also rise). In contrast, if the credit ends up flowing into consumption, savings will remain unchanged. More plausibly, one can imagine that investment is subject to an "accelerator effect," so that increased aggregate demand prompts firms to increase capital spending. In that case, even if the credit flows into consumption, investment will still rise - and since savings is equal to investment, this means that savings will also go up. Intuitively, this happens because the increase in income derived from higher employment more than offsets the increase in consumption. This leads to higher aggregate savings. 4 The word "persistent" is important here. To see why, suppose that in Example 5, the people who consumed 125 coconuts each had previously been thrifty, which had allowed them to build up large bank deposits. Then they could finance their additional spending by running down their accumulated savings, rather than taking on new debt. Likewise, if those who consumed 75 coconuts had previously lived beyond their means, then instead of adding to their deposits, they would be paying back existing debt. The net result would be less debt, not more. 5 Shang-Jin Wei and Xiao Zhang, "The Competitive Saving Motive: Evidence From Rising Sex Ratios And Savings Rates In China," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 119, No. 3, 2011. 6 Please see Geopolitical Strategy Special Report, "Sino-American Conflict: More Likely Than You Think, Part II," dated November 6, 2015, available at gps.bcaresearch.com. 7 Please see Global Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "A Weaker RMB Ahead," dated March 6, 2015, available at gis.bcaresearch.com. 8 The exact trade is to be long China H-Shares versus the MSCI Emerging Market index, currency unhedged. The corresponding ETFs for this trade are the Hang Seng Investment Index Funds Series: H-Share Index ETF (2828 HK), and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM US). The Hang Seng China Enterprise index comprises of China H-Shares (Chinese stocks available to international investors) currently trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Strategy & Market Trends Tactical Trades Strategic Recommendations Closed Trades

Feature Chart I-1Corporate Leverage Situation##br## Has Continued To Improve Corporate Leverage Situation Has Continued To Improve Corporate Leverage Situation Has Continued To Improve This week we are updating our China Industry Watch thematic chartpack to present a visual presentation of the changing situation in China's corporate sector, and its relevance to broader stock market performance. Overall, the Chinese corporate sector's financial situation has improved modestly since mid-last year, as measured by BCA's Corporate Health Monitors1 (Box on page 3). The improvement is fairly broad based across sectors, but some highly cyclical sectors have witnessed sharper rebounds. Broadly speaking, several observations can be made (Appendix starting on page 4). First, the Chinese corporate sector's debt situation has improved, both in terms of leverage ratio and debt sustainability. The liabilities-to-asset ratio for all industries has continued to decline (Chart I-1). Even in some highly levered sectors such as coal producers and steelmakers, the debt ratios have rolled over after years of deterioration. Moreover, interest coverage ratio has increased across the board, particularly within the asset-heavy metals and energy sectors, due to a dramatic increase in profits. This stands in stark contrast to widely held concerns among investors over China's corporate leverage situation, discussed in detail in some of our recent Special Reports.2 Meanwhile, profit growth has also accelerated for all sectors due to a combination of higher revenue and wider margins. The profit picture has recovered strongly for coal mines, steelmakers and non-ferrous metals producers from deeply depressed starting points. The government's supply-side constraints on these sectors in the past year reduced production, which together with recovering demand led to a massive increase in prices and a drastic recovery in profitability. Profitability for most other sectors has also risen, albeit more moderately. In terms of efficiency, inventory turnover has improved across most industries, underscoring the de-stocking process of the corporate sector. Asset turnover has also stopped deteriorating, while there has not been much recovery in receivable turnover ratios in most industries. However, enterprise surveys have shown some notable improvement in fund turnover of late, which we suspect will soon show up in corporate financial statements (Chart I-2). Overall, our efficiency measures are showing some encouraging signs. Finally, the growth rate of total assets of all firms has continued to decelerate, consistent with the weak fixed asset investment (FAI) figures in recent years (Chart I-3). Decelerating asset growth is visible across the board, but is most pronounced in mining- and manufacturing-related sectors such as coal mines, metals producers and machinery manufacturers. The sharp turnaround in profitability and improving corporate health should begin to support capital spending in these sectors, which will likely support investment in the overall economy.3 Chart I-2Receivable Turnover Is On The Mend Receivable Turnover Is On The Mend Receivable Turnover Is On The Mend Chart I-3Capital Spending Slowdown Has Become Advanced Capital Spending Slowdown Has Become Advanced Capital Spending Slowdown Has Become Advanced BCA China Industry Watch includes four categories of financial ratios to monitor a sector's leverage, profitability, growth and efficiency, respectively. Some of these ratios, as shown in Table I-1, are slightly tweaked from conventional definitions due to data availability. The financial data in our exercise are from the official statistics on overall industrial firms, of which the listed companies are a subset, but most financial ratios based on the two sets of data are very similar, especially for the heavy industries that dominate the Chinese stock markets - both onshore and offshore. The financial ratios on leverage, growth and profitability are almost identical for some sectors, while some other sectors that are not well represented in the stock market, such as technology, healthcare and consumer sectors, show notable divergences. As the Chinese equity universe continues to expand, we expect that the two sets of data will increasingly converge. Table I-1The China Industry Watch Messages From BCA China Industry Watch Messages From BCA China Industry Watch Yan Wang, Senior Vice President China Investment Strategy yanw@bcaresearch.com 1 Please see China Investment Strategy Special Report, "Introducing The BCA China Industry Watch," dated February 10, 2016, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. 2 Please see China Investment Strategy Special Reports, "Chinese Deleveraging? What Deleveraging!" dated June 15, 2016, and "Rethinking Chinese Leverage," dated October 27, 2016, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. 3 Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "Be Aware Of China's Fiscal Tightening," dated February 16, 2017, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. Appendix: China Industry Watch All Firms Chart II-1, Chart II-2, Chart II-3, Chart II-4, Chart II-5, Chart II-6 Chart II-1Non-Financial Firms: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart II-2Non-Financial Firms: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart II-3Non-Financial Firms: Leverage Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Leverage Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Leverage Indicators Chart II-4Non-Financial Firms: Growth Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Growth Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Growth Indicators Chart II-5Non-Financial Firms: Profitability Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Profitability Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Profitability Indicators Chart II-6Non-Financial Firms: Efficiency Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Efficiency Indicators Non-Financial Firms: Efficiency Indicators Oil&Gas Sector Chart II-7, Chart II-8, Chart II-9, Chart II-10, Chart II-11, Chart II-12 Chart II-7Oil&Gas Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart II-8Oil&Gas Sector:##br## Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart II-9Oil&Gas Sector: Leverage Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Leverage Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart II-10Oil&Gas Sector: Growth Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Growth Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Growth Indicators Chart II-11Oil&Gas Sector: Profitability Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Profitability Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart II-12Oil&Gas Sector: Efficiency Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Efficiency Indicators Oil&Gas Sector: Efficiency Indicators Coal Sector Chart II-13, Chart II-14, Chart II-15, Chart II-16, Chart II-17, Chart II-18 Chart II-13Coal Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Coal Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Coal Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart II-14Coal Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Coal Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Coal Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart II-15Coal Sector: Leverage Indicators Coal Sector: Leverage Indicators Coal Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart II-16Coal Sector: Growth Indicators Coal Sector: Growth Indicators Coal Sector: Growth Indicators Chart II-17Coal Sector: Profitability Indicators Coal Sector: Profitability Indicators Coal Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart II-18Coal Sector: Efficiency Indicators Coal Sector: Efficiency Indicators Coal Sector: Efficiency Indicators Steel Sector Chart II-19, Chart II-20, Chart II-21, Chart II-22, Chart II-23, Chart II-24 Chart II-19Steel Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Steel Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Steel Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart II-20Steel Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Steel Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Steel Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart II-21Steel Sector: Leverage Indicators Steel Sector: Leverage Indicators Steel Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart II-22Steel Sector: Growth Indicators Steel Sector: Growth Indicators Steel Sector: Growth Indicators Chart II-23Steel Sector: Profitability Indicators Steel Sector: Profitability Indicators Steel Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart II-24Steel Sector: Efficiency Indicators Steel Sector: Efficiency Indicators Steel Sector: Efficiency Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector Chart II-25, Chart II-26, Chart II-27, Chart II-28, Chart II-29, Chart II-30 Chart II-25Non Ferrous Metals Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart II-26Non Ferrous Metals Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart II-27Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Leverage Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Leverage Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart II-28Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Growth Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Growth Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Growth Indicators Chart II-29Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Profitability Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Profitability Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart II-30Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Efficiency Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Efficiency Indicators Non Ferrous Metals Sector: Efficiency Indicators Construction Material Sector Chart II-31, Chart II-32, Chart II-33, Chart II-34, Chart II-35, Chart II-36 Chart II-31Construction Material Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Construction Material Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Construction Material Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart II-32Construction Material Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Construction Material Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Construction Material Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart II-33Construction Material Sector: ##br##Leverage Indicators Construction Material Sector: Leverage Indicators Construction Material Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart II-34Construction Material Sector: ##br##Growth Indicators Construction Material Sector: Growth Indicators Construction Material Sector: Growth Indicators Chart II-35Construction Material Sector: ##br##Profitability Indicators Construction Material Sector: Profitability Indicators Construction Material Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart II-36Construction Material Sector:##br## Efficiency Indicators Construction Material Sector: Efficiency Indicators Construction Material Sector: Efficiency Indicators Machinery Sector Chart III-37, Chart III-38, Chart III-39, Chart III-40, Chart III-41, Chart III-42 Chart III-37Machinery Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Machinery Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Machinery Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart III-38Machinery Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Machinery Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Machinery Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart III-39Machinery Sector: Leverage Indicators Machinery Sector: Leverage Indicators Machinery Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart III-40Machinery Sector: Growth Indicators Machinery Sector: Growth Indicators Machinery Sector: Growth Indicators Chart III-41Machinery Sector: Profitability Indicators Machinery Sector: Profitability Indicators Machinery Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart III-42Machinery Sector: Efficiency Indicators Machinery Sector: Efficiency Indicators Machinery Sector: Efficiency Indicators Automobile Sector Chart III-43, Chart III-44, Chart III-45, Chart III-46, Chart III-47, Chart III-48 Chart III-43Automobile Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Automobile Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Automobile Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart III-44Automobile Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Automobile Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Automobile Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart III-45Automobile Sector: Leverage Indicators Automobile Sector: Leverage Indicators Automobile Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart III-46Automobile Sector: Growth Indicators Automobile Sector: Growth Indicators Automobile Sector: Growth Indicators Chart III-47Automobile Sector: Profitability Indicators Automobile Sector: Profitability Indicators Automobile Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart III-48Automobile Sector: Efficiency Indicators Automobile Sector: Efficiency Indicators Automobile Sector: Efficiency Indicators Food&Beverage Sector Chart III-49, Chart III-50, Chart III-51, Chart III-52, Chart III-53, Chart III-54 Chart III-49Food&Beverage Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart III-50Food&Beverage Sector:##br## Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart III-51Food&Beverage Sector: Leverage Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Leverage Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart III-52Food&Beverage Sector: Growth Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Growth Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Growth Indicators Chart III-53Food&Beverage Sector: ##br##Profitability Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Profitability Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart III-54Food&Beverage Sector:##br## Efficiency Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Efficiency Indicators Food&Beverage Sector: Efficiency Indicators Information Technology Sector Chart III-55, Chart III-56, Chart III-57, Chart III-58, Chart III-59, Chart III-60 Chart III-55Information Technology Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Information Technology Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Information Technology Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart III-56Information Technology Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Information Technology Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Information Technology Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart III-57Information Technology Sector: ##br##Leverage Indicators Information Technology Sector: Leverage Indicators Information Technology Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart III-58Information Technology Sector: ##br##Growth Indicators Information Technology Sector: Growth Indicators Information Technology Sector: Growth Indicators Chart III-59Information Technology Sector: ##br##Profitability Indicators Information Technology Sector: Profitability Indicators Information Technology Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart III-60Information Technology Sector: ##br##Efficiency Indicators Information Technology Sector: Efficiency Indicators Information Technology Sector: Efficiency Indicators Utilities Sector Chart III-61, Chart III-62, Chart III-63, Chart III-64, Chart III-65, Chart III-66 Chart III-61Utilities Sector: ##br##Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Utilities Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Utilities Sector: Stock Price & Valuation Indicators Chart III-62Utilities Sector: ##br##Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Utilities Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Utilities Sector: Relative Performance Of Valuation Indicators Chart III-63Utilities Sector: Leverage Indicators Utilities Sector: Leverage Indicators Utilities Sector: Leverage Indicators Chart III-64Utilities Sector: Growth Indicators Utilities Sector: Growth Indicators Utilities Sector: Growth Indicators Chart III-65Utilities Sector: Profitability Indicators Utilities Sector: Profitability Indicators Utilities Sector: Profitability Indicators Chart III-66Utilities Sector: Efficiency Indicators Utilities Sector: Efficiency Indicators Utilities Sector: Efficiency Indicators Cyclical Investment Stance Equity Sector Recommendations

Highlights Global manufacturing inventories are low but this does not guarantee higher share prices for global cyclical stocks. If an increase in inventories is accompanied by strengthening final demand, it will be very bullish for the global business cycle. If final demand growth falters, global cyclical plays will relapse amid rising inventories. China's inventory depletion has been due to the large fiscal and credit impulse in the past 12 months - i.e., improving final demand has been instrumental to inventory shedding. Looking forward, the mainland's aggregate credit and fiscal impulse seems to have topped out raising the odds of a reversal in EM/China plays sooner than later. The risk/reward of EM/China plays remains unattractive. Feature Global Manufacturing Inventories Global manufacturing inventories have been depleted over the past 12 months, and inventory levels are generally low (Chart I-1 and Chart I-2). Chart I-1Global Manufacturing Inventories Are Low Global Manufacturing Inventories Are Low Global Manufacturing Inventories Are Low Chart I-2Global Manufacturing Inventories Are Low Global Manufacturing Inventories Are Low Global Manufacturing Inventories Are Low Could inventory re-stocking extend the current manufacturing cycle recovery worldwide? Will low inventories and re-stocking in China lengthen the nation's business cycle upswing? Chart I-3 demonstrates inventory cycles and manufacturing production within manufacturing-intensive economies. The correlation is not stable. Currently, this entails that low manufacturing inventories and a potential rise in inventories over the course of this year do not guarantee acceleration in industrial output growth. Having reviewed manufacturing inventory cycles and their correlation with share prices, we conclude that the key to share prices is final demand - not inventory swings. Manufacturing inventories have dropped in the past 12 months because final demand has been robust (Chart I-4). Historically, periods of re-stocking have often coincided with poor equity market performance. Indeed, Taiwanese, Korean, Japanese and German non-financial share prices have no stable correlation with their respective manufacturing inventory cycles (Chart I-5). In short, manufacturing inventories could rise in the months ahead, but this does not guarantee higher share prices in cyclical industries. Chart I-3Inventories And Production ##br##Are Not Always Correlated Inventories And Production Are Not Always Correlated Inventories And Production Are Not Always Correlated Chart I-4Robust Demand Has Led ##br##To Inventory Depletion Robust Demand Has Led To Inventory Depletion Robust Demand Has Led To Inventory Depletion Chart I-5Non-Financial Share Prices And##br## Inventories: Little Correlation Non-Financial Share Prices And Inventories: Little Correlation Non-Financial Share Prices And Inventories: Little Correlation By and large, the outlook for corporate profits is contingent on final demand rather than re-stocking. All of the above confirms that inventories are a residual of demand and supply. Stronger-than-expected demand is bullish for share prices, though it also often coincides with declining inventories. By contrast, rising inventories typically reflect demand falling behind output growth (one can define it as involuntary re-stocking) and these periods are not favorable for share price gains in cyclical industries. One caveat is that there could be a re-stocking cycle amid strengthening demand or, in other words, voluntary re-stocking. If this transpires in the coming months, it will be extremely bullish for share prices as it will supercharge output growth. While the latter scenario - inventory re-stocking amid strengthening final demand - could very well occur within the advanced economies this year, odds of such positive dynamics are low in EM/China. Bottom Line: Share prices in global cyclical sectors are driven by swings in final demand - not in inventories. Going forward, global manufacturing inventories will rise. If this rise is accompanied by strengthening demand, it will be very bullish for the global business cycle. Otherwise, global cyclical plays will relapse as inventories rise. What Drives China's Inventory Cycles Chart I-6 shows that China's manufacturing inventories typically deplete when the credit and fiscal impulse is rising, and vice versa. China's manufacturing inventories have been exhausted because demand has been strong in the past 12 months. In turn, demand strength has originated from the country's massive fiscal and credit stimulus push from the first half of 2016. Chart I-6China: Strong Policy Stimulus Led To Manufacturing Inventories Reduction China: Strong Policy Stimulus Led To Manufacturing Inventories Reduction China: Strong Policy Stimulus Led To Manufacturing Inventories Reduction That said, China's aggregate fiscal and credit impulse seems to have recently rolled over, pointing to a top in its manufacturing mini-cycle and commodities prices (Chart I-7). This signals a potential deceleration in final demand. On the whole, the ongoing modest tightening by the People's Bank of China and by the bank regulator (the China Banking Regulatory Commission) amid a lingering credit bubble is raising the odds of a moderate credit slowdown in the months ahead. Even modest credit growth deceleration will result in a negative credit impulse (Chart I-8, top panel). Meanwhile, the mainland's fiscal impulse has already dropped (Chart I-8, bottom panel). Chart I-7China: Aggregate Credit And Fiscal##br## Stimulus Has Topped Out China: Aggregate Credit And Fiscal Stimulus Has Topped Out China: Aggregate Credit And Fiscal Stimulus Has Topped Out Chart I-8China: A Breakdown Of Credit ##br##And Fiscal Impulses China: A Breakdown Of Credit And Fiscal Impulses China: A Breakdown Of Credit And Fiscal Impulses On the whole, these developments are leading us to maintain our negative bias toward EM risk assets and China plays. What has gone wrong in our view/analysis on China in the past 12 months is that the nation's credit growth has stayed much stronger than we expected. In our April 13, 2016 report,1 we did a scenario analysis and argued that China's large fiscal stimulus push would be offset by a negative credit impulse if credit growth slowed from 11.5% to below 10%. In reality, credit growth has been between 11.5-12.5%, producing a positive credit impulse. Barring tightening by the central bank or bank regulators, mainland banks can continue originating loans/money at a double-digit pace, as they have been doing for many years (Chart I-9). In general, commercial banks do not need savings to create money/loans and there are few limits on Chinese banks originating loans "out of thin air," as we argued in our Trilogy of Special Reports on money/loan creation, savings and investment.2 Chart I-9China's Credit/Money Growth##br## Remains Rampant China's Credit/Money Growth Remains Rampant China's Credit/Money Growth Remains Rampant Therefore, if credit growth does not slow, our negative view on China's growth will be off-the-mark again. The pressure point in such a case will be the exchange rate. Unlimited money creation/oversupply of local currency is bearish for the value of the RMB. The RMB will continue depreciating, but it is not certain if it will hurt EM risk assets. It is a major consensus view nowadays that the Chinese authorities will not allow growth to suffer ahead of the Party Congress in autumn of this year. Yet, the PBoC and bank regulators are modestly tightening to "normalize" credit growth. Some clients may wonder why we are placing so much emphasis on the rollover of credit and fiscal impulses now, while placing little emphasis on these same indicators in 2016 when they were recovering. The rationale is as follows: when there is a credit bubble - as there is in China now - we tend to downplay the importance of policy easing and put more significance on policy tightening. The opposite also holds true: when the credit/banking system is healthy, we tend to downplay the impact of moderate policy tightening and put greater emphasis on policy easing. In a credit bubble, it does not take much tightening to trigger a downtrend that unwinds excesses. Similarly, moderate tightening in a healthy credit system should not be feared. From a big picture perspective, we turned bearish on China's growth several years ago due to the formation of a credit bubble. The bubble has only gotten larger and an adjustment has not yet even started. This does not justify altering our fundamental assessment of China's growth outlook. It would have been ideal to turn positive tactically on EM/China plays a year ago. Unfortunately, we did not do that. Presently, chasing the market higher might not be the best investment idea. Based on all this and given: the sharp rally in EM/China plays and widespread investor complacency and consensus that "everything" will be fine before the end of this year; modest tightening in Chinese monetary policy amid lingering credit and asset (property and the corporate bond market) bubbles; our outlook for higher U.S. bond yields and a stronger U.S. dollar; the fact that financial markets are forward looking, and timing is impossible; We believe the risk/reward of EM/China plays remains unattractive. In regard to EM ex-China, as we documented in last week's report, domestic demand in the developing economies has not recovered at all, or is mixed at best. DM final demand strength and global manufacturing inventory rebuilding will certainly help Korea and Taiwan, but not other emerging economies. The most important variables for other EM economies including China are domestic demand and/or commodities prices. If commodities prices relapse along with China's credit and fiscal impulse (Chart I-7, bottom panel), EM financial markets will suffer regardless of the growth trends within advanced economies. In fact, strong U.S. growth could lead to higher U.S. interest rate expectations and prop up the U.S. dollar. This will also be a bad omen for EM and commodities. Bottom Line: China's inventory depletion has been due to the large fiscal and credit impulse in the past 12 months - i.e., improving final demand has been instrumental to inventory shedding. Looking forward, the mainland's aggregate credit and fiscal impulse seems to have topped out, raising the odds of a reversal in EM/China plays sooner than later. Industrial Metals Inventories And Prices There is no good data reflecting industrial metals inventories globally. London Metal Exchange and Shanghai Futures Exchange data are likely not indicative of global metals stockpiles. China accounts for close to 50% of global demand for industrial metals, and its demand is critical to prices. Given that the large spike in metals prices in the past several months has coincided with improving Chinese economic data, one would expect the mainland to be the driving force behind the rally. However, Chart I-10 demonstrates that China's imports of industrial metals actually contracted in 2016. This is puzzling, but we have to take it at face value. The top panel of Chart I-11 depicts that traders' net long positions in copper are at a six-year high. This might partially explain the rally in copper in the recent months. Chart I-10China's Import Of Base Metals##br## And Base Metals Prices China's Import Of Base Metals And Base Metals Prices China's Import Of Base Metals And Base Metals Prices Chart I-11Traders Are Long ##br##Copper And Oil Traders Are Long Copper And Oil Traders Are Long Copper And Oil Clearly, China has been depleting its stock of industrial metals, and is likely primed to increase its imports. Nevertheless, periods of metals re-stocking by the mainland have historically not entailed higher industrial metals prices (Chart I-10). On the contrary, rising Chinese imports of metals have actually coincided with falling prices. One can interpret this relationship as China buying industrial metals when prices are falling. This is consistent with China attempting to buy commodities on dips. As to metals inventories in China, the picture is as follows: Steel inventories have plummeted and are low (Chart I-12). One can safely argue that there will be an inventory re-stocking cycle in China. Nevertheless, it is highly uncertain if this will be bullish for steel prices and steel stocks. In fact, there has been a mild negative correlation between steel prices and inventories; historically, when inventories have risen, prices declined (Chart I-12, top panel). This confirms that inventory levels are a residual of demand and supply, and prices are often driven by final demand - not inventories. This is also corroborated by the bottom panel of Chart I-12, which illustrates that share prices of global steel companies are sometimes negatively correlated with China's steel inventories. Stock prices occasionally sell off when inventories rise, and rally when inventories are shrinking. In contrast to steel and steel products, iron ore inventories have risen, and it seems the re-stocking cycle is well advanced (Chart I-13). Chart I-12China: Steel Inventories And Prices China: Steel Inventories And Prices China: Steel Inventories And Prices Chart I-13China: Iron Ore Inventories And Prices China: Iron Ore Inventories And Prices China: Iron Ore Inventories And Prices Yet, again there is no strong correlation between inventories and prices of iron ore (Chart I-13). In our discussions with clients, investors often attribute the rally in industrial metals in general and steel prices in particular over the past 12 months to supply cutbacks in China. While supply reductions have helped in the case of certain metals, it is also evident that the rally in industrial commodities has been driven by rising demand globally and in China. First, China's aggregate credit and fiscal impulse was positive until very recently, implying strengthening demand and thereby higher metals prices. Second, if there were only production cutbacks in steel and other commodities and not demand recovery, the mainland's manufacturing PMI would not have risen (Chart I-14). Finally, steel production has risen both in China and the rest of the world (Chart I-15). Hence, world steel supplies have expanded in the past 12 months. Given this has coincided with rising steel prices, it confirms there has been notable improvement in demand for steel. Chart I-14China: Steel Prices Are Up ##br##Because Of Strong Demand China: Steel Prices Are Up Because Of Strong Demand China: Steel Prices Are Up Because Of Strong Demand Chart I-15Chinese And Global ##br##Steel Production Chinese And Global Steel Production Chinese And Global Steel Production We are not experts in the ebbs and flows of commodities supplies, but it seems the Chinese government's mandated steel capacity cutbacks have not prevented rising steel output in China. In the meantime, rising prices amid rising production and falling inventories are indicative of robust final demand for many metals. Bottom Line: Industrial metals prices have risen because demand in the real economy and among financial investors has been strong. That said, a rollover in China's fiscal and credit impulse and a strong U.S. dollar will likely create headwinds for industrial metals prices over the course of this year. A Word About Oil Inventories OECD oil product inventories have continued to rise, despite supply cuts (Chart I-16, top panel). At the same time, our proxy for change in China's oil inventories has been very elevated for a while, depicting strategic and/or commercial inventory building on the mainland (Chart I-16, bottom panel). It is true that supply curtailments have been instrumental to the rally in oil prices, but the continued inventory buildup also indicates that supply is still outpacing demand. Besides, traders' net long positions in crude have spiked close to their 2014 highs (Chart I-11, bottom panel). This corroborates that demand for crude, like for copper, has partially been financial rather than from final consumers. Finally, U.S. rig counts have recovered somewhat, which may be indicative of a continued rise in America's oil output (Chart I-17). Chart I-16Oil Inventories Keep On Rising Oil Inventories Keep On Rising Oil Inventories Keep On Rising Chart I-17U.S. Rig Counts And Oil Production U.S. Rig Counts And Oil Production U.S. Rig Counts And Oil Production Bottom Line: While we do not have expertise to follow or forecast oil supply dynamics, we are biased in believing that the risk-reward for oil prices is unattractive because of a strong U.S. dollar and potentially weak EM/China asset prices, which could trigger a reduction in net long positions in crude. Investment Conclusions Complacency reigns in the global financial markets. EM equity volatility has fallen close to its cycle lows, the U.S. VIX is depressed, U.S. equity investor sentiment is very elevated and EM corporate credit spreads have plummeted to a ten-year low (Chart I-18). While the timing of a reversal is impossible, the risk-reward profile of EM financial markets is greatly unattractive. The U.S. trade-weighted dollar has consolidated recently, and might be primed for another upleg. As the U.S. dollar resumes its uptrend, EM risk assets will likely sell off. Finally, EM share prices have failed to outperform the developed bourses much, despite the rally in commodities and amelioration in Chinese growth (Chart I-19). Chart I-18Complacency Reigns Complacency Reigns Complacency Reigns Chart I-19EM Equities Have Not Yet Outperformed EM Equities Have Not Yet Outperformed EM Equities Have Not Yet Outperformed Remarkably, analysts' net earnings revisions for EM stocks have so far failed to turn positive (Chart I-20). Either analysts' EPS expectations were originally still too high, or companies are failing to deliver profits. Whatever the reason, the implication is that the consensus is more bullish on EM than is suggested by the underlying fundamentals. Within an EM equity portfolio, our overweights remain Taiwan, Korea, India, China, Thailand, Russia and central Europe. Our underweights are Malaysia, Indonesia, Turkey, Brazil and Peru. We are neutral on other bourses. Finally, the EM equity benchmark is at a critical technical resistance level (Chart I-21) but odds do not favor a sustainable breakout. Chart I-20EM EPS Net Revisions Are Still Negative EM EPS Net Revisions Are Still Negative EM EPS Net Revisions Are Still Negative Chart I-21EM Stocks: A Breakout Attempt EM Stocks: A Breakout Attempt EM Stocks: A Breakout Attempt Arthur Budaghyan, Senior Vice President Emerging Markets Strategy arthurb@bcaresearch.com 1 Please refer to the Emerging Markets Strategy Special Report titled, "Revisiting China's Fiscal And Credit Impulses", dated April 13, 2016, available at ems.bcaresearch.com 2 Trilogy of Special Reports on money/loan creation, savings and investment, titled, "Misconceptions About China's Credit Excesses" dated October 26, 2016, "China's Money Creation Redux And The RMB", dated November 23, 2016 and "Do Credit Bubbles Originate From High National Savings?", dated January 18, 2017, available at ems.bcaresearch.com Equity Recommendations Fixed-Income, Credit And Currency Recommendations

Feature Valuations, whether for currencies, equities, or bonds, are always at the top of the list of the determinants of any asset's long-term performance. In this optic, we regularly update the set of long-term valuation models for currencies we introduced in a February 16 Special Report titled "Assessing Fair Value In FX Markets." Included in these models are variables such as productivity differentials, terms-of-trade shocks, net international investment positions, real rate differentials, and proxies for global risk aversion.1 These models cover 23 currencies, incorporating both G10 and EM FX markets. Twice a year, we provide clients with a comprehensive update of all these long-term models in one stop. This time around, a few fair value estimates have changed. This reflects the revisions to the productivity estimates we source from the Conference Board. These models are not designed to generate short- or intermediate-term forecasts. Instead, they reflect the economic drivers of a currency's equilibrium. Their purpose is therefore threefold. First, they provide guideposts to judge whether we are at the end, beginning, or middle of a long-term currency cycle. Second, by providing strong directional signals, these models help us judge whether any given move is more likely be a countertrend development or not, offering insight on its potential longevity. Third, they help us and our clients to cut through the fog, and understand the key drivers of cyclical variations in a currency's value. The U.S. Dollar Chart 1Upward Revisions To Productivity Have Lifted The USD's Fair Value Upward Revisions To Productivity Have Lifted The USD's Fair Value Upward Revisions To Productivity Have Lifted The USD's Fair Value Based on its key long-term drivers - real yield differentials and the relative productivity trend between the U.S. and its trading partners - the U.S. dollar is trading around 5% above its upward-pointing fair value. Moreover, the equilibrium exchange rate for the USD has risen from previous estimations as the U.S. productivity series computed by the Conference Board have been revised upward. This comforts us in our bullish stance on the U.S. dollar. For one, the valuation premium has fallen relative to its previous estimate. Second, the dollar remains substantially below previous overvaluation peaks, where it traded at a more than 20% premium to fair value (Chart 1). Additionally, with the U.S. slack being much smaller than in most other major economies, the Fed is in a much firmer position to increase rates than most of its counterparts. This suggests that U.S. rates will continue to boost the dollar higher, justifying a growing premium to its long-term equilibrium. Finally, the dollar's recent valuation picture on a broad basis reflects the fact that many EM currencies and commodity producers are still pricey. As such, this also comforts us in our stance to underweight commodity currencies versus European ones and the yen. The Euro Chart 2The Euro Can Cheapen Further The Euro Can Cheapen Further The Euro Can Cheapen Further On a multi-year time horizon, the euro is driven by the relative productivity trend of the euro area with its trading partners, its net international investment position, terms-of-trade shocks, and rates differentials. The euro continues to trade at a 6% discount to its fair value (Chart 2). However, the euro was in fact 15% below equilibrium in both 1984 and 2002, respectively, suggesting that the valuation advantage of the euro is not yet large enough to justify aggressively bidding up the common currency. Additionally, monetary divergences with the U.S. will continue to weigh on the EUR. On a structural basis the euro area continues to exhibit signs of slack. The employment-to-population ratio for prime age workers is at 2008 levels and domestic inflationary pressures remain muted, especially when one considers how cheap the euro is. The ECB policy is therefore likely to remain very easy for the foreseeable future. Additionally, the ECB might leave policy even easier than the broad euro area economic averages would suggest as it focuses its efforts on the weakest members of the union. While in the early 2000s it was Germany, today it is the European periphery that is in need of easy money to create fiscal room and ease latent deleveraging pressures. The Yen Chart 3The Yen Will Stay Cheap The Yen Will Stay Cheap The Yen Will Stay Cheap The yen's long-term equilibrium is a function of Japan's net international investment position, global risk aversion, and commodity prices. The large Japanese current account surplus continues to lift the yen's fair value, albeit at a slower pace than last year. While the yen may have strengthened substantially in recent months against the dollar, on a broader basis the yen is still very cheap (albeit not as cheap as a year ago) (Chart 3). This simply reflects the fact that many Asian currencies and the euro - key competitors of Japan - and the CNY - the currency of the most crucial export market for the Japanese - have also fallen substantially versus the dollar. The current outsized efforts by the Bank of Japan to lift domestic inflation expectations at any costs suggest that Japanese policy will maintain a dovish bias for an extended period of time, even if realized inflation perks up. As such, like the euro, the yen is likely to remain a prey to global monetary policy divergences, especially against the USD. Nonetheless, the yen's attractive valuation - comparable to that which prevailed around the time of the Plaza Accord - implies that USD/JPY could stay as the preferred cross by which to play any dollar correction that should emerge along the upward trajectory of the greenback. The British Pound Chart 4GBP: The Economy Matters More Than Valuations GBP: The Economy Matters More Than Valuations GBP: The Economy Matters More Than Valuations The fair value of the pound has fallen over the past year and is projected to continue doing so in 2017. This development is explained by the U.K.'s poor trend productivity growth, falling real yields, and slowing house price appreciation. Despite this change in the fair value, following the drubbing received by the pound in the Brexit vote aftermath, GBP is cheap on a long-term basis (Chart 4). However, the decline in investment that may materialize following the fall in British FDI inflows mean that the U.K.'s productivity may deteriorate even faster than is currently projected. This would further depress the pound's fair value, implying that the GBP may not be as cheap as the model currently highlights. Even if this prospect were to materialize, the pound could still be an attractive play on a cyclical horizon. For one, British real rates are likely to pick up as the economy continues to surprise to the upside, mitigating some of the negative implications of falling productivity on the GBP's fair value. Additionally, the last legal hurdles to the invocation of the Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty are being cleared, suggesting that the Brexit negotiations will begin in earnest in March. While this could create some episodes of currency volatility as the British and EU negotiators establish their stances, the end of the anticipation of this fearful moment may let investors focus on the U.K.'s economic robustness. The Canadian Dollar Chart 5CAD At Fair Value: The Future Depends On Oil CAD At Fair Value: The Future Depends On Oil CAD At Fair Value: The Future Depends On Oil The Loonie's fair value is driven by commodity prices, relative productivity trends, and the Canadian net international position. While the Canadian current account deficit and the nation's poor productivity growth would argue for a lower fair-value, these have been compensated by a rebound in commodity prices, creating stability for the CAD's equilibrium exchange rate. The sharp rebound in the Canadian dollar over the past 12 months means that the exceptional undervaluation in February last year has been fully eradicated (Chart 5). However, the CAD is not experiencing the same level of overvaluation as many of the other commodity currencies, like the AUD, the NZD, the BRL, or the RUB. This could reflect the NAFTA discount now created by Trump's demanding a renegotiation of the trade deal, which puts Canadian exports at marginal risk. Ultimately, with the CAD troughs and peak very much a direct negative function of the USD, our bullish stance on the greenback suggests that the CAD could once again experience a discount in the coming 12 to 18 months, especially as the U.S. dollar carries such a heavy weight in the trade-weighted CAD. In fact, we expect the Canadian economy to underperform that of the U.S. as the Canadian consumer remains hampered by higher debt loads and as Canadian capex remains hurt by excess capacity. This will only accentuate the monetary divergence between the CAD and the USD. The Australian Dollar Chart 6The AUD Has Overshot Fundamentals: Use Further Rallies To Sell The AUD Has Overshot Fundamentals: Use Further Rallies To Sell The AUD Has Overshot Fundamentals: Use Further Rallies To Sell The fair value of the Aussie, driven by Australia's net international position and commodity prices, has stabilized. However, it may begin to deteriorate anew if commodity prices lose some of their luster, a growing probability event in the face of a strong USD. Moreover, the AUD's rally has only caused this currency to become ever more expensive and it now offers one of the poorest risk-reward profiles in the G10. Historically, current levels of overvaluation have proved a reliable sell-signal for the Aussie and warrant shorting this currency right now (Chart 6). Our portfolio has a negative AUD bias. The AUD's poor valuations suggest that it is discounting an extremely positive growth outcome in the Chinese economy. We think China is likely to surprise to the downside, especially against such lofty expectations. Raising the AUD's risk profile even further, China has not only exhausted its latest fiscal stimulus and clamped down on the real estate market, but also cracked down on excess steel production. This means that the demand for iron ore and coking coal - of which China has accumulated large inventory piles - could weaken even more than a Chinese economic deceleration would imply. Australian terms-of-trades could suffer a nasty shock. The New Zealand Dollar Chart 7NZD Is Expensive, But Not As Much As The AUD NZD Is Expensive, But Not As Much As The AUD NZD Is Expensive, But Not As Much As The AUD Natural resources prices, real rate differentials, and the VIX are the key determinants of the Kiwi's fair value, highlighting the NZD's nature as both a commodity currency and a carry currency. Both the fall in the VIX and the rebound in commodities are currently causing the gradual appreciation in the New Zealand's dollar equilibrium exchange rate. Thus, this trend could easily reverse if the global reflation trade begins to wane. Currently, the NZD is expensive (Chart 7), albeit not as exceptionally so as the AUD, the BRL, or the RUB. This partly explains why we like the Kiwi more than these currencies. In fact, while we worry about the outlook for the NZD versus the USD, the attractive domestic situation in New Zealand, where growth is the highest in the G10 and employment is growing at an eye-popping 6% annual rate, suggests that the RBNZ could abandon its new-found neutral bias in favor of a hawkish one later this year. Hence, we like the Kiwi against the AUD, the BRL, or the RUB. The Swiss Franc Chart 8The Swiss Net International Investment Position Makes The SNB's Life Difficult The Swiss Net International Investment Position Makes The SNB's Life Difficult The Swiss Net International Investment Position Makes The SNB's Life Difficult Switzerland's enormous and growing net international investment position continues to be the most important factor lifting the fair value of the Swiss franc. Yet, in the short-term, this is irrelevant. The SNB has demonstrated its capacity and credibility when it comes to keeping a floor under EUR/CHF. Thus, the Swiss franc will continue to trade in line with the euro, even if the current French political risks would have normally caused an appreciation in the Swiss Franc versus the euro. This means that the real trade-weighted CHF should not deviate much from its long-term fair value estimate (Chart 8). Nonetheless, this peg contains the seeds of its own demise. The cheaper the CHF gets, the larger the economic distortions in the Swiss economy become. Already, Switzerland sports the most negative interest rates in the world. This directly reflects the large injections of liquidity required from the SNB to stem any CHF appreciation. A consequence of these low real rates has been the appreciation in the already-expensive Swiss real estate. Ultimately, we expect the SNB to be forced to capitulate to all the inflows and abandon its floor. While this will not happen tomorrow, it will likely result in a comparable move to the one that followed the tentative unpegging of January 2015. Back then, the CHF was not particularly cheap. While it is too early to make this bet, we suspect that a pick-up in actual inflation will constitute the key signal for investors to begin betting against the SNB's current policy. The Swedish Krona Chart 9The Riksbank Has Achieved One Of Its Goal: SEK Is Cheap The Riksbank Has Achieved One Of Its Goal: SEK Is Cheap The Riksbank Has Achieved One Of Its Goal: SEK Is Cheap The Swedish krona continues to trade cheaply, even if its long-term fair value remains on a secular downward trajectory (Chart 9). Yet, the undemanding valuations of the SEK hides a complex picture. It is approximately fairly valued against the GBP and expensive against the NOK, two of its largest trading partners. However, the SEK is cheap against the USD and the euro. Amongst the latter two, we prefer buying the Swedish krona against the EUR rather than against the USD. The SEK has historically been very sensitive to the USD; therefore, USD/SEK is very exposed to the dollar's cyclical bull market. However, the current widening of European government spreads echoes the 2010-2012 period, when EUR/SEK softened considerably as the survival of the euro was up in the air in investors' minds. Dutch, French, and potential Italian elections this year could prove similarly unnerving for investors, creating a source of downside risk in EUR/SEK. Moreover, Swedish domestic fundamentals remain much stronger than those of the euro area, further strengthening the case of for shorting EUR/SEK. The Norwegian Krone Chart 10NOK, Still Undervalued Despite The Rally NOK, Still Undervalued Despite The Rally NOK, Still Undervalued Despite The Rally A year ago, when global markets were in full panic mode, the Norwegian krona became the most attractive currency in the world on a valuation basis. After a blistering rally, this is not the case anymore (Chart 10). Nonetheless, it continues to trade on the cheap side, and remains the cheapest commodity currency in the world along with the Colombian peso. We therefore maintain a positive bias toward the NOK against the rest of the commodity complex, especially the very expensive and equally oil-exposed RUB. While USD/NOK, like USD/SEK, is very exposed to general dollar strength, we remain short EUR/NOK on a 12-month basis. The NOK's main long-term favorable factor still is its enormous net international investment position of 194% of GDP, which creates a structural upward bias on the country's current account surplus. Today, while the euro area runs a record high current account surplus of 3% of GDP, its net international investment position remains negative at 8% of GDP. Additionally, in an almost perfect mirror image to the euro area, Norway shows little signs of having entered a liquidity trap post-2008. The money multiplier remains high, loan growth has stayed strong, and inflation has remained perky. This means that the Norges Bank is in a better position to cyclically increase rates than the ECB. Chinese Yuan Chart 11Can The Yuan Weaken More? Can The Yuan Weaken More? Can The Yuan Weaken More? As commodity prices strengthened and Chinese productivity growth slowed, the strong upward bias to the yuan's long-term fair value paused in 2016 and may even fall a bit in 2017. Nonetheless, the CNY continuous fall has cheapened this currency considerably since 2015 (Chart 11). Does this mean that the CNY is a buy at this juncture? No. First, on a trade-weighted basis, the experience of the past 20 years has been that it bottoms at greater discounts to fair value. Moreover, while testing the current model, we also tried various productivity series for China. Depending on the one used, the yuan's discount to fair value would considerably shrink, implying a high degree of uncertainty around the actual cheapness of the RMB. Second, China continues to suffer from capital outflows, suggesting that domestic expected returns have yet to be equilibrated with those available in the rest of the world. A lower RMB would help generate this adjustment. Third, China is still an economy with too much capacity and too much debt that also intends to liberalize its internal markets and external accounts, even if slowly. Historically, this set of circumstances has most often come along with a weak currency, a key tool to alleviate the deflationary tendencies created by these forces. Fourth, and more specific to the dollar, the PBoC now targets a basket of currencies which means that when the DXY strengthens, USD/CNY also rallies. The dollar bull market will therefore continue to hurt the RMB versus the USD. Finally, Trump's protectionist rhetoric represents a big risk for China as exports to the U.S. represent 4% of China's GDP. A simple way to regain some of the competitiveness that would be lost to tariffs would be for the PBoC to let the CNY drift lower against the USD, though this would also aggravate the trade tensions. The Brazilian Real Chart 12Trouble In Rio Trouble In Rio Trouble In Rio Hampered by poor productivity trends, which weigh on the Brazilian current account balance, the fair value of the real remains quite depressed, even as commodity prices have sharply rebounded over the course of the past 12 months. In fact, the violent rally in the BRL over the same timeframe has made it one of the most expensive currencies tracked by our models (Chart 12). At current levels of overvaluation, the next 6 months return on the BRL has always been negative. The potential downside for BRL over the next 12-18 months is large. The rally reflected a general easing in EM financial conditions, fiscal stimulus in China, and the ejection of Dilma Rousseff, replaced by Michel Temer. While the change of government has depressed the geopolitical risk premium, any real improvement rests on the Temer administration's stated goal of slashing the size of the public sector. In the Mundell-Fleming model, the resulting destruction in domestic demand cuts local real rates, and therefore, the BRL's appeal to international investors. This a severe headwind to overcome, especially when coupled with as clear of a message as the one currently sent by valuations. Finally, the recent strength in the dollar along with the rise in DM global rates is creating a tightening of global and EM liquidity conditions, exactly as the Chinese fiscal stimulus wanes. This is a very poor risk profile for the BRL. The Mexican Peso Chart 13MXN Is Not Cheap Enough Yet MXN Is Not Cheap Enough Yet MXN Is Not Cheap Enough Yet Interestingly, despite the surge in USD/MXN in the wake of Trump's electoral victory, the MXN is not very cheap on a real trade-weighted basis (Chart 13). The peso's equilibrium rate has been pulled lower by the nation's persistent current account deficit which has continuously hurt its net international investment position. Conceptually, this is akin to a relative oversupply of Mexican assets to the rest of the world, depressing the peso's fair-value. The large stock of Mexican USD-denominated debt is a testament to this phenomenon. At this juncture, while PPP valuations suggest that the peso is attractive relative to the USD, Mexico's negative net international investment position and its large stock of U.S.-dollar debt warrant cautiousness. The Mexican economy is very exposed to a tightening in global liquidity conditions and the borrowing-costs squeeze represented by a higher dollar and higher U.S. rates. Hence, USD/MXN could have more upside from here on a 12-to-18 month basis. Compared to other EM currencies like the BRL, the RUB, or the CLP, however, the Mexican peso seems very attractively priced as all these currencies currently trade at large premia to their fair value. Additionally, a "Trump-protectionism" risk premium is already embedded in the Mexican peso, but the above currencies do not seem to suffer from the same handicap. While not as directly exposed to this risk as Mexico, these countries would nonetheless be affected by a trade war between the U.S. and Asia, and particularly between the U.S. and China. The Chilean Peso Chart 14The CLP Has Overshot The CLP Has Overshot The CLP Has Overshot The Chilean peso real effective exchange rate is driven by the country's productivity trend relative to its trading partners and the real price of copper - which proxies the Chilean terms-of-trade. As a result of the rally since the winter of 2015, the real CLP is at a 4-year high and is now in expensive territory (Chart 14). Global risks point to downside for the CLP, as copper is likely to underperform against other commodities. EM liquidity conditions should dry up due to the rising dollar, compounding potential problems created by China's efforts to crack down on real estate activity, the biggest source of copper consumption by a wide margin. The recent meteoric surge in copper prices will leave the red metal vulnerable to such dynamics. Domestic factors also don't bode well for the peso. The Chilean housing market is currently going through its biggest downturn since 2008 while economic activity remains anemic. Furthermore, the worker's strike in "La Escondida", the world's biggest copper mine, should cause strains on Chilean exports. All of these factors will be too great for the CLP to overcome. Thus, we remain short the peso. The Colombian Peso Chart 15COP Is A Cheap Oil Play COP Is A Cheap Oil Play COP Is A Cheap Oil Play The real COP is driven by Colombia's relative productivity trends and the price of oil, the country's main export. With oil prices having rebounded, the fair value has returned to 2014 levels. Nevertheless, the COP still undershoots its fundamentals (Chart 15). This reflects the premium demanded by investors to compensate for Colombia's large current account deficit equal to 6.3% of GDP. The outlook for the COP has brightened, especially against other commodity currencies. The OPEC deal to cut oil production seems to be on track so far, with 90% compliance amongst OPEC members. Furthermore, the potential for a strong economic performance in DM economies suggests that oil demand should remain firm. This should help the COP outperform currencies that have a higher sensitivity to metals like the BRL and the ZAR. Domestic factors also paint a positive picture for the peso. The Colombian economic situation is more robust than in other EM economies. During the commodity boom years, Colombian banks were much more orthodox in their lending than their EM counterparts. Thus, this Andean country does not suffer from unsustainable debt dynamics, and therefore, if EM suffers a liquidity-induced slowdown, Colombia should withstand this shock better. The South African Rand Chart 16ZAR Has Outshined Gold, Higher Rates Will Be A Problem ZAR Has Outshined Gold, Higher Rates Will Be A Problem ZAR Has Outshined Gold, Higher Rates Will Be A Problem South Africa's dismal productivity trends continue to force a downtrend upon the rand's long-term fair value. The rally in commodity prices has nonetheless lifted the current fair value of the ZAR for early 2017 compared to estimates run last year. Despite this improvement, the rand's 6% rally in real terms has still overshot any justifiable fundamentals, leaving this currency overvalued (Chart 16). Furthermore, if commodity prices were to correct, not only would the fair value of the rand fall, but the current overshoot would also correct. This implies substantial downside risk to the ZAR. The ZAR may remain stable in the short term as the dollar's correction continues and gold prices enjoy a healthy bounce. However, the rand's copious handicaps will come back to haunt investors once the previous dollar strength is fully digested and the USD resumes its cyclical bull market. Moreover, such a move is likely to come hand-in-hand with rising U.S. rates, embracing both gold and the rand in an inescapable kiss of death. The Russian Ruble Chart 17RUB Has Fully Priced Any Russia-American Rapprochement RUB Has Fully Priced Any Russia-American Rapprochement RUB Has Fully Priced Any Russia-American Rapprochement Buoyed by both the perceived benefits to the Russian economy of OPEC oil production cuts and the fall in the geopolitical risk premium coming from the expected Trump/Putin rapprochement, the Ruble is now very expensive (Chart 17). While RUB was more expensive in the years prior to the 1998 Russian default, it still manages currently to trade at its highest premium in more than 18 years. Trump and Putin really need to get along famously well - and it is not clear that they will at the moment. As the RUB is massively expensive, we would not chase it higher from here. Not only is the upside to oil prices limited, since at current oil prices, shape of the oil curve, and financing costs, shale producers are once again investing in their oil fields, pointing to higher U.S. production in the coming quarters. Also, the civility between Trump and Putin is likely to prove ephemeral: Russia's commercial links are with Europe and China, not the U.S. If anything, the U.S.'s growing exports of energy products mean that both nations will soon compete in that market. We know how much Trump loves foreign competition. Thus, we prefer other petro currencies to the RUB. At the current juncture, buying CAD/RUB and NOK/RUB makes sense. Especially as the valuation disadvantage is clear enough to point to a large ruble-bearish move in both crosses. The Korean Won Chart 18No Big Discount In The KRW No Big Discount In The KRW No Big Discount In The KRW The fair value of the won is positively correlated with the nation's net international investment position, but shows a strong negative relationship with oil prices. This reflects the status of the nation as an oil importer, and thus lower oil prices constitute a positive terms-of-trade shock for Korea. Also, the real trade-weighted won is inversely correlated with EM spreads. This makes sense as the won is a very pro-cyclical currency reflecting the tech and manufacturing bias of the Korean economy. At the current juncture, the won is moderately cheap (Chart 18). The Korean won may be trading on the cheap side, but we worry that this good value may prove somewhat illusory. A strong U.S. dollar and rising DM real rates are likely to result in stresses for many EM borrowers, whether they borrow in USD, produce commodities, or even worse, do both. Such an event would put pressure on EM spreads and push down the fair value of the KRW. An additional problem for the won is Donald Trump. Korea has been one of the greatest beneficiaries of the expansion of globalization from 1980 to 2008, as its export growth was some of the strongest in the world. Today, if Trump's protectionist tendencies gather momentum, Korea is likely to end up on his line of sight. The passage of import-punishing tax reform, cancellation of the KORUS free trade agreement, or imposition of tariffs on that country would have two potential effects on the won. They could cause the country's current account to deteriorate, hurting the prospective path of Korea's net international position and dragging the KRW fair value lower. This would be a slower drag on the won. Or, the other path, which we judge more likely, market participants (probably helped by Korean monetary authorities) could embed a discount into the KRW's fair value equivalent to the expected impact of the tariffs. This discount would alleviate the pain of the tariff, and would materialize in swift fashion. The Indian Rupee Chart 19SGD Has Downside INR Real Equilibrium Keeps Rising, But Inflation Still Clouds The Outlook INR Real Equilibrium Keeps Rising, But Inflation Still Clouds The Outlook The fair value of the real trade-weighted INR is driven by India's productivity performance relative to its trading partners - the key factor behind the gentle upward slope in the equilibrium value for the rupee, its net international investment position, and Indian real interest rate differentials. However, the elevated level of inflation by global standards in India means that despite its long-term nominal downtrend, the INR is not cheap (Chart 19). Yet, while it will be difficult for this currency to rally against the USD if the dollar is in a broad-based uptrend, things are looking up for the INR relative to other EM currencies. The swift implementation of the currency reform last year was a bit of a debacle, but results are beginning to show through: deposit growth is improving. Thus, the constant shortage of loanable savings that has structurally hurt Indian capex and fomented elevated inflation in that country might begin to decrease. This means that over the long term, India's relative productivity performance might improve further and the country's stubborn inflation might decrease. This would lift the INR's fair value over time. The key to this positive outlook will be the RBI. With the personnel and political-administrative changes at its helm, it is hard to judge whether the Indian central bank will lift rates enough as capex perks up. That would limit future inflation and protect the value of the fiat currency and hence the long-term attractiveness of keeping money in Indian banks. We are optimistic, but await clearer proofs. The Philippine Peso Chart 20The Duterte Discount The Duterte Discount The Duterte Discount President Rodrigo Duterte's politics have been a source of fear for investors. As a result, PHP has depreciated against the USD and is now trading at a 10% discount (Chart 20). The fair value of the peso, driven by the cumulative current account and commodity prices, is on an uptrend. This will likely continue as a strong USD should depress commodity prices, improving the Philippines' trade balance and terms of trade. Additionally, improving DM economies will likely generate higher remittances to the Philippines, boosting the current account balance, domestic consumption, and the PHP's long-term value. These dynamics underpin our bullish long-term view on the PHP. However, potential political risks still loom large for the economy. So far Duterte has allowed technocrats to run economic policy, but if he takes a greater personal interest in this area it is likely to be unfriendly to foreign investors, potentially endangering broader FDI inflows. This could erode the PHP long-term equilibrium value over time. Relations with the Trump administration do not have any clarity yet but potentially offer substantial downside risks. Tempering our fear for now, Duterte is taking a reasonable approach to economic management and opening the way for new investment from China, suggesting political risks to foreign investment remain contained. The Singapore Dollar Chart 21INR Real Equilibrium Keeps Rising, But Inflation Still Clouds The Outlook SGD Has Downside SGD Has Downside Our model points to a relatively stable long-term valuation of the Singaporean Dollar. The currency displays little statistical significance with economic factors, with its relationship with commodities being one of indirect statistical coincidence. This is because the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) utilizes the currency as its main monetary policy tool, underpinning the SGD's cyclical nature. As inflation has only just stepped back into positive territory in December 2016, and retail prices remain weak, MAS is unlikely to deviate from its current policy stance and will remain accommodative. Therefore, SGD is likely to depreciate from its current 3.6% overvaluation (Chart 21). This strong mean-reverting characteristic warrants a short position on the SGD. Last September, we suggested selling SGD against USD over JPY, a recommendation we stick to, since a dollar bull market will add additional pressure onto the SGD. The Hong Kong Dollar Chart 22HKD Is Expensive But The Peg Will Survive HKD Is Expensive But The Peg Will Survive HKD Is Expensive But The Peg Will Survive While USD/HKD is pegged, the real trade-weighted Hong-Kong dollar can still experience wild swings. Since 2011, its real appreciation has been driven by a wave of EM currency weakness and higher inflation in HK than the U.S. Also, the strength in USD/CNY since January 2014 has added to the HKD's surge. Thanks to this combination, the Hong Kong dollar remains more expensive than it was in 1997, on the eve of the Asian Crisis (Chart 22). This does not mean that HKD is about to depreciate. In fact, we expect the Hong Kong Monetary Authority to keep the peg alive as it has been a pillar of stability since its introduction in 1983. With reserves of 114% of GDP, not only does the HKMA have the financial fire-power to support the HKD, but also Hong Kong continues to sport a current account surplus of 4%. While it is possible that USD/HKD will appreciate toward 7.85, the upper range of the target zone, any depreciation in the real HKD will be a consequence of deepening deflation. This suggests that HK real estate prices will suffer more, especially as they remain significantly overvalued. The Saudi Riyal Chart 23Saudi Needs Higher Oil Prices Or An Internal Devaluation Will Rage For Years To Come Saudi Needs Higher Oil Prices Or An Internal Devaluation Will Rage For Years To Come Saudi Needs Higher Oil Prices Or An Internal Devaluation Will Rage For Years To Come The Saudi Riyal shares two attributes with the HKD: It is a pegged currency and a prohibitively expensive one (Chart 23). Moreover, the very poor productivity performance of the Saudi economy necessitates a perpetually falling real effective exchange rate. Like the HKMA, SAMA will continue to defend its exchange rate for now, as it holds reserves of US$538 billion to protect its currency. Also, Saudi budget deficits can be curtailed further and the Saudi government can continue to borrow in the debt market. Finally, the production-cut agreements between OPEC and Russia have put a floor under oil prices for the time being, exactly as the market was already moving into deficit. They give SAMA even more time. However, one cannot forget that following the 1986 oil collapse, USD/SAR rose by 11%. Therefore, if oil prices relapse as U.S. shale production picks up anew or as the broad USD rallies further, the probability of a SAR surprise devaluation grows. Moreover, selling SAR could also act as insurance against further trouble in the Middle East, especially if Trump follows through on his demand that America's allies pay more for their own defense. At the current juncture, a small long USD/SAR position within a portfolio is equivalent to owning an instrument with a deep out-of-the-money option-like payoff: It costs little, has a small probability of being exercised, but if it does, it will pay great rewards. Mathieu Savary, Vice President Foreign Exchange Strategy mathieu@bcaresearch.com Haaris Aziz, Research Assistant haarisa@bcaresearch.com Juan Manuel Correa, Research Assistant juanc@bcaresearch.com 1 For a more detailed discussion of the various variables incorporated in the models, please see Foreign Exchange Strategy Special Report, "Assessing Fair Value In FX Markets," dated February 26, 2016, available at fes.bcaresearch.com Trades & Forecasts Forecast Summary Core Portfolio Tactical Trades Closed Trades

Highlights Chinese fiscal stimulus, both direct fiscal spending and infrastructure investment, has slowed significantly since late last year. This raises a red flag on the sustainability of the cyclical upturn. The Chinese economy should remain buoyant in the near term, despite fiscal retrenchment. Policy initiatives should be closely monitored. Tactically upgrade H shares back to "overweight." Stay cyclically positive, and favor Chinese equities in global and EM portfolios. There are early signs that deflation is re-emerging in Hong Kong. Feature The Chinese economy has maintained strong momentum since the beginning of the year. Some sectors are showing remarkable strength, an extraordinary development considering that January is historically a lackluster month for industrial activity due to seasonality factors. The recent strength is all the more noteworthy as policymakers have apparently rolled back fiscal support significantly since late last year, and have more recently also tightened on the monetary front.1 The divergence between strengthening growth momentum and waning policy support raises hopes that the economy has finally found its footing with self-sustainable dynamics, but at the same time raises the risk that growth may relapse anew without policy tailwinds - especially if struck by an exogenous shock. For now we maintain our benign view on China's cyclical growth outlook, but the risk is tilted to the downside, and policy initiatives should be closely monitored going forward. Meanwhile, we remain positive on Chinese equities on a cyclical basis. This week we are also upgrading our tactical "bullishness rating" on H shares back to "overweight." Strengthening Growth Versus Waning Fiscal Support Despite seasonal noise in the macro data in the first two months of the year, most macro numbers coming out of China of late have surprised significantly to the upside. Producer prices have continued to accelerate, heavy-machine sales have been booming, and even exports have rebounded sharply (Chart 1). The regained strength in the economy is partly attributable to early last year's low base, which has supercharged year-over-year growth rates. However, there is little doubt at this stage that China's growth recovery since early last year has developed into a mini boom. Beneath the robust growth numbers, there are some disconcerting undercurrents on the policy front (Chart 2). Fiscal spending growth has decelerated sharply since early 2016, and actually contracted towards year end. More importantly, capital spending on infrastructure construction, which can be viewed as an indicator for broader policy-driven spending in the economy, also slowed sharply in the last quarter. Fixed asset investment in transportation networks and utility concerns have also abruptly slowed. Investment in railway construction contracted by almost 30% in the final months of last year from a year earlier. All of this underscores a synchronized reduction in the public sector's involvement in the economy of late. Chart 1Growth Recovery... Growth Recovery... Growth Recovery... Chart 2... Meets Waning Fiscal Stimulus ... Meets Waning Fiscal Stimulus ... Meets Waning Fiscal Stimulus It is not immediately clear why the government has significantly scaled back fiscal support. Combined with the latest interest rate adjustments by the People's Bank of China, it is likely that the authorities have become content with the economy's performance to a degree that any direct policy pump-priming in their view is no longer necessary or justified. If China's ongoing cyclical growth improvement was due to the authorities' reflationary efforts, then the abrupt change in policy course certainly raises a red flag on how long the recovery may last. Can The Growth Recovery Continue Without Fiscal Support? Chart 3Monetary Conditions Matter More Than Fiscal Monetary Conditions Matter More Than Fiscal Monetary Conditions Matter More Than Fiscal We expect the Chinese economy to remain buoyant in the next two quarters, even without major acceleration in fiscal spending, for the following reasons: First, China's growth recovery since last year has been driven primarily by easing monetary conditions through a weakening exchange rate and falling real interest rates, rather than strong fiscal boost. Chart 3 shows that industrial sector growth deterioration worsened dramatically in 2014, which in hindsight was due to a combination of aggressive fiscal retrenchment and tighter monetary conditions index (MCI). Even though fiscal expenditures began to accelerate strongly starting in early 2015, the economy only began to improve a year later when the MCI started to ease. In fact, the industrial sector continued to improve throughout 2016 along with a rising MCI when fiscal expenditures decelerated. In other words, the industrial sector's performance is much more tightly correlated with the country's monetary conditions than the cyclical swings in fiscal spending. On one hand, the RMB exchange rate matters fundamentally for the manufacturing sector, which is heavily exposed to overseas markets. On the other hand, lower real interest rates, either through easing deflation or falling nominal rates, has been a primary driver of corporate profitability and overall business conditions, given the country's debt-centric financial intermediation system (Chart 4). As PPI is still rising rapidly and the trade-weighted RMB has once again rolled over, monetary conditions will likely continue to ease, which will further boost the industrial sector despite the fiscal cuts. Second, the slowdown in infrastructure spending will likely be compensated by accelerating investment in other sectors, manufacturing and mining in particular. Easing monetary conditions and ensuing growth improvement have significantly boosted corporate profitability, which should in turn boost manufacturing capital spending (Chart 5). It is likely that the multi-year slowdown in manufacturing sector capital spending has run its course and will accelerate going forward, albeit gradually.2 Investment in the mining sector is still contracting sharply. However, there has also been a dramatic improvement in profits among mining related industries, particularly coal and base metals (Chart 5, bottom panel). If historical correlations hold, the dramatic contraction in mining sector investment has likely already become very advanced, if not already bottomed. At minimum, it is highly unlikely that mining-related capex will continue to contract at an accelerating pace. Chart 4Interest Rates Versus Corporate Profits Interest Rates Versus Corporate Profits Interest Rates Versus Corporate Profits Chart 5Profits Versus Capital Spending Profits Versus Capital Spending Profits Versus Capital Spending A potential revival in manufacturing and mining capex will reverse a major growth headwind the Chinese economy has faced in recent years, which will continue to buoy growth despite slowing infrastructure construction. Manufacturing and mining account for over 33% of China's total fixed asset investment, higher than the 25% share of infrastructure alone (Chart 6). Indeed, there are signs that the corporate sector's intentions to expand capital investment may already be improving. In recent months medium- to long-term new loans to the corporate sector have accelerated strongly, which could be a sign that the corporate sector is beefing up on investment capital (Chart 7). Chart 6Manufacturing And Mining Capex ##br##Versus Infrastructure Construction Manufacturing And Mining Capex Versus Infrastructure Construction Manufacturing And Mining Capex Versus Infrastructure Construction Chart 7Longer Term Loans##br## Have Accelerated Sharply Longer Term Loans Have Accelerated Sharply Longer Term Loans Have Accelerated Sharply Finally, we maintain the view that overall inventory levels in the economy are unsustainably low, and improving growth and easing deflation should push producers to re-stock (Chart 8). This should also ease any near-term pressure on production, even if new orders are hit by slowing public sector demand. In other words, the economy has a built-in buffer for a period of weaker demand which could allow policymakers to re-orient demand-side policies in light of the new growth situation. Chart 8The Case For Inventory Restocking The Case For Inventory Restocking The Case For Inventory Restocking In short, we expect that waning fiscal support in the economy will not derail the cyclical recovery. Macro numbers may look toppy in the coming months, as the favorable base effect from last year's low levels wears out, but business activity should remain buoyant at least in the coming two quarters. Nonetheless, in a global environment that is still facing enormous challenges and mounting uncertainties, domestic policy tightening obviously raises downside risks. The annual People's Congress in early March should offer some important clues on the Chinese government's growth priorities and policy directions, and should be closely monitored. Tactically Upgrade H Shares In terms of Chinese stocks, our attempt to time a market correction in H shares ahead of the U.S. presidential elections in October did not bear fruit as expected.3 This week we are upgrading our tactical "bullishness rating" on H shares back to "overweight". Even though H shares did correct, they found support at key technical levels and have broken out of late, underscoring a strong technical pattern (Chart 9). We are still concerned that some global markets, especially U.S. stocks, appear frothy and are vulnerable to some sort of shakeout, but the market appears to be in a melt-up phase in the near term. The risk of being left out in a rising market is higher than otherwise. More importantly, Chinese H shares are not nearly as frothy, if not outright cheap, which should further limit downside risks. The Trump administration has notably toned down the anti-China rhetoric, and the near term risk of escalating trade tension between the U.S. and China has abated.4 This should also soothe investors' concerns on Chinese stocks. Bottom Line: Tactically upgrade H shares back to "overweight." A shares will likely remain largely trendless. Meanwhile, stay cyclically positive, and favor Chinese equities in global and EM portfolios. Hong Kong: Is Deflation Coming Back? Hong Kong's GDP numbers to be released next week are likely to show the economy accelerated in the final quarter of the year, according to our model (Chart 10). However, the improvement was likely almost entirely driven by exports rather than domestic factors. In fact, retail sales contracted by 3% in December from a year ago. More importantly, with the exception of essential items such as food, alcohol and tobacco, the growth rates of all other major consumer goods are in deeply negative territory. Durable goods, an important barometer for consumer confidence and spending power, dropped by a whopping 20% in value, or 15.8% in real terms from a year ago, underscoring very weak domestic demand. Therefore, Hong Kong's growth outlook will remain heavily dependent on external demand. Chart 9H Shares: A Technical Breakout H Shares: A Technical Breakout H Shares: A Technical Breakout Chart 10Hong Kong's Growth Recovery Hong Kong's Growth Recovery Hong Kong's Growth Recovery Weak domestic demand also weighs heavy on inflation. Hong Kong's headline inflation is falling rapidly, primarily driven by declining rental prices, and odds are high that inflation may dip below zero in the coming months. This means that deflation may re-emerge for the first time since 2005. These developing deflationary pressures underscore the frothy housing market, and also suggest the Hong Kong dollar may have become expensive again. The currency board system prevents nominal exchange rate adjustments, and therefore any adjustment has to be through changes in domestic prices. There is little systemic risk in Hong Kong's financial system, but the re-emergence of deflationary pressures further weakens domestic demand, augments growth difficulties and bodes poorly for asset prices, especially real estate. We will follow up on these issues in the coming weeks. Yan Wang, Senior Vice President China Investment Strategy yanw@bcaresearch.com 1 Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "On Chinese Tightening," dated February 9, 2017, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. 2 Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "Growth Watch," dated January 19, 2017, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. 3 Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "Housing Tightening: Now And 2010," dated October 13, 2016, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. 4 Please see China Investment Strategy Special Report, "Dealing With The Trump Wildcard," dated January 26, 2017, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. Cyclical Investment Stance Equity Sector Recommendations

Chart I-1No Recovery In Domestic Demand A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Feature Today we are publishing charts on cyclical economic conditions within developing economies. The aim of this report is to aid investors in gauging the business cycle profiles of these individual emerging economies. Global trade and manufacturing have recovered, driven by an acceleration in U.S. and euro area demand. Chinese imports have also recovered, supporting global trade amelioration. Although there has been improvement in EM manufacturing PMIs (diffusion indexes), "hard" EM economic data have not recovered (Chart I-1). This is especially true for EM domestic demand measures such as consumer spending and real gross fixed capital formation. Given the still-lingering credit excesses in many EM countries, credit growth is likely to decelerate further, leaving little chance of domestic demand recovering. Bottom Line: Continue underweighting EM equities and credit markets versus their DM peers. China Chart I-2, Chart I-3, Chart I-4, Chart I-5, Chart I-6, Chart I-7 Chart I-2C2 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-3C3 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-4C4 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-5C5 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-6C6 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-7C7 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Korea Chart I-8, Chart I-9, Chart I-10, Chart I-11 Chart I-8C8 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-9C9 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-10C10 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-11C11 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Taiwan Chart I-12, Chart I-13 Chart I-12C12 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-13C13 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies India Chart I-14, Chart I-15, Chart I-16, Chart I-17 Chart I-14C14 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-15C15 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-16C16 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-17C17 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Indonesia Chart I-18, Chart I-19 Chart I-18C18 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-19C19 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Malaysia Chart I-20, Chart I-21 Chart I-20C20 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-21C21 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Thailand Chart I-22, Chart I-23, Chart I-24 Chart I-22C22 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-24C24 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-23C23 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Philippines Chart I-25, Chart I-26 Chart I-25C25 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-26C26 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Brazil Chart I-27, Chart I-28, Chart I-29, Chart I-30, Chart I-31, Chart I-32 Chart I-27C27 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-28C28 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-29C29 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-30C30 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-31C31 C31 C31 Chart I-32C32 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Mexico Chart I-33, Chart I-34, Chart I-35, Chart I-36, Chart I-37 Chart I-33C33 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-34C34 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-35C35 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-36C36 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-37C37 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Colombia Chart I-38, Chart I-39, Chart I-40, Chart I-41 Chart I-38C38 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-39C39 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-40C40 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-41C41 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Peru Chart I-42, Chart I-43, Chart I-44 Chart I-42C42 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-43C43 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-44C44 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chile Chart I-45, Chart I-46, Chart I-47, Chart I-48 Chart I-45C45 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-46C46 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-47C47 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-48C48 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Argentina Chart I-49, Chart I-50, Chart I-51, Chart I-52, Chart I-53 Chart I-49C49 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-50C50 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-51C51 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-52C52 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-53C53 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Russia Chart I-54, Chart I-55 Chart I-54C54 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-55C55 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Turkey Chart I-56, Chart I-57, Chart I-58, Chart I-59 Chart I-56C56 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-57C57 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-58C58 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-59C59 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies South Africa Chart I-60, Chart I-61, Chart I-62, Chart I-63 Chart I-60C60 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-61C61 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-62C62 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-63C63 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Central Europe Chart I-64, Chart I-65 Chart I-64C64 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Chart I-65C65 A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies A Cyclical Growth Profile Of EM Economies Equity Recommendations Fixed-Income, Credit And Currency Recommendations

Highlights The latest adjustment of the interest rates of some PBoC lending facilities reflects China's ongoing moves toward market-driven interest rate reforms. Domestic growth improvement calls for higher interest rates, but it is too soon to conclude whether the latest interest rate adjustment is the beginning of a new tightening cycle or a temporary pause in a broad reflation process. The PBoC will remain data dependent and policy will remain accommodative. The interest rate increases in the PBoC lending facilities will likely lead to higher cost of funding for the corporate sector as well as mortgage borrowers The economic impact of the rising cost of funding should not be significant. Feature In the past three weeks, the People's Bank of China (PBoC) has raised the interest rates it charges financial institutions through various lending facilities. Questions abound over how the PBoC's latest maneuvers differ from their traditional monetary policy tools, and more importantly how these changes impact the economy and financial markets. What? In a slew of actions since late January, the PBoC has increased interest rates on several liquidity management facilities. On January 25th interest rates on the Medium-Term Lending facility (MLF) were raised, the first increase since the MLF debuted in 2014. Last week interest rates on reverse repurchase agreements (repos) were also hiked by 10 basis points. Meanwhile, interest rates on the Standing Lending Facility (SLF) were also lifted. Overall, these actions have increased financial institutions' funding costs on borrowing from the central bank. Table 1The PBoC's Tool Box On Chinese Tightening On Chinese Tightening There have been important changes in how the PBoC conducts monetary policy in recent years. While conventional measures such as the benchmark lending rate and reserve requirement ratio (RRR) have not been abandoned, the PBoC has been increasingly focusing on utilizing various new tools (Table 1).1 The RRR has been left unchanged, while the central bank has been actively dealing with financial institutions directly to manage interbank liquidity. The latest move shows a further departure from conventional monetary operations: instead of directly adjusting benchmark policy rates on lending and deposits of commercial banks, the PBoC has targeted interest rates on its claims to financial institutions. These changes reflect China's ongoing moves toward market-driven interest rate reforms, which at this stage have become quite advanced. Commercial banks are no longer under the administrative constraints on interest rates they pay to depositors and charge borrowers, and therefore their marginal cost of funding has become increasingly important for setting their own loan rates. Meanwhile, targeting interest rates of these lending facilities rather than benchmark interest rates or the RRR provides some important advantages from the PBoC's point of view. The newly created alphabet soup of various lending facilities gives the PBoC much more flexibility to "fine-tune" interbank liquidity in terms of both magnitude and timing, and can be quickly reversed if necessary. The RRR adjustment, on the other hand, is inherently much more blunt and harder to turn. These lending facilities can aid the central bank's macro-prudential policy. For example, banks that fail to meet certain conditions of the macro-prudential assessment (MPA) will have to pay punitive interest rates to borrow from the PBoC. Similarly, the PBoC can offer subsidized loans to policy lenders for certain prioritized projects. Direct adjustment on commercial banks' loan and deposit rates is not only against the broad trend of the country's interest rate reform, but also requires coordination of various government departments under the State Council. The PBoC has much higher discretion in changing its own interest rates that it charges commercial banks. Chart 1Policy Rates Catch Up To The Market Policy Rates Catch Up To The Market Policy Rates Catch Up To The Market Why? The PBoC's latest adjustments on interest rates of various lending facilities and open market operations should not be surprising, given the significant increase in interbank interest rates and domestic bond yields since late last year. For example, both the seven-day interbank rate and one-year government bond yields have increased from about 2.3% to 2.6% (Chart 1). If the PBoC left its short-term lending rates unchanged, it would potentially create arbitrage opportunities in which commercial banks could borrow from the central bank and lend out to other institutions. In other words, the PBoC has already begun to tighten by allowing market interest rates to inch higher since late last year, and the recent policy rate adjustment is in fact a "catch-up." A few reasons may be behind the central bank's tightening bias. The economy has recovered considerably, with both quickening activity and easing deflation. Nominal GDP growth accelerated to 9.6% in the last quarter, up from a bottom of 6.5% in late 2015 when benchmark interest rates were cut to current levels2 (Chart 2). The January macro numbers are likely distorted by the Chinese New Year effect, but holiday sales have been quite strong compared with a year ago, and the latest PMI numbers suggest continued acceleration in both the industrial and service sectors. All of this naturally calls for higher interest rates. It is possible that the January credit numbers are uncomfortably high for the PBoC, which may have pushed the authorities to send a signal to lenders to cool things off to prevent overheating and damp further property price gains. The central bank has been concerned about leverage and overtrading in the interbank market as well as local bond markets by financial institutions, and the latest tightening moves have also been designed to reduce financial excess (Chart 3). Repo transactions in the interbank market have already dropped sharply since late year when the PBoC began to push interest rates higher. This, together with regulators' latest administrative overhaul on commercial banks' wealth management products and off-balance-sheet items, all underscore the determination to rein in excesses in the banking sector. Chart 2Growth Rebound Generates Upward Pressure ##br##On Interest Rates Growth Rebound Generates Upward Pressure On Interest Rates Growth Rebound Generates Upward Pressure On Interest Rates Chart 3The PBoC Aims To Tame##br## Financial Excess The PBoC Aims To Tame Financial Excess The PBoC Aims To Tame Financial Excess So What? Whatever the reason, the PBoC will likely continue to shift away from "conventional" tools and increasingly focus on the new framework that has emerged in recent years in conducting monetary policy. Benchmark loan and deposits rates are already on the way out, and the RRR will also be gradually faded. The problem is that the RRR is still at 17% for large banks and 15% for smaller lenders - both of which are still elevated compared with historical norms. As a result, commercial banks have been putting ever rising reserve deposits with the central bank, while at the same time their borrowings from the PBoC have also skyrocketed - leading to an ever-expanding balance sheet at the PBoC (Chart 4). Technically, it is likely that the RRR will be lowered to a more reasonable level, cutting the central bank's liability, while at the same time the PBoC can reduce its claims to commercial banks on the asset side. This operation will shrink the PBoC's balance sheet, but does not necessarily change the liquidity situation in the banking system. It is too soon to conclude whether the latest interest rate adjustment is the beginning of a new tightening cycle or a temporary pause in a broad reflation process. We expect the PBoC will remain data dependent, and that the Federal Reserve's actions will also be taken into consideration. In the near term, a few observations can be made. First, the interest rate increases in the PBoC lending facilities, together with the increase in market-driven interest rates, will likely lead to higher cost of funding for the corporate sector as well as mortgage borrowers (Chart 5). Already, discount rates of bank acceptance bills, a proxy for short-term funding costs of the corporate sector tightly linked with interbank rates, have surged in recent months. The expected returns of Wealth Management Products (WMPs), an alternative to conventional bank deposits that set banks' marginal funding costs, have also picked up notably since October. This means the average interest rate on commercial banks' loans likely have already been rising. Chart 4The PBoC's Liquidity Operation The PBoC's Liquidity Operation The PBoC's Liquidity Operation Chart 5Corporate Cost Of Borrowing Will Likely Rise Corporate Cost Of Borrowing Will Likely Rise Corporate Cost Of Borrowing Will Likely Rise The economic impact of the rising cost of funding should not be meaningful, in our view, as it is accompanied by a strengthening economy and easing deflation. The overall monetary conditions index, which takes into consideration both real interest rates and the exchange rate, has continued to ease, thanks largely to the rapid increase in producer prices. Furthermore, there is still massive scope for the Chinese authorities to reform the financial sector and reduce the funding costs of the country's dynamic smaller private enterprises - although falling sharply in recent years, the Wenzhou private loan rate, a proxy for private enterprises' borrowing costs, still stands at 16% (Chart 6). This will likely continue to drift lower as the country's financial reforms continue to deepen. In short, the latest policy tightening does not change our cyclical assessment on the broader economy. In this vein, higher interest rates may introduce some near-term turbulence in stocks, but will not change the cyclical profile. The marginal increase in interest rates will not derail the growth improvement, profit growth should continue to recover and policymakers are unlikely to overkill. Meanwhile, strategically we continue to favor Chinese equities in global and EM portfolios. Finally, rising interest rates in China should lend some support to the RMB, due to the close link between China-U.S. interest rate differentials and the USD/CNY exchange rate (Chart 7). The interest rate gap between Chinese government bonds and U.S. Treasurys has widened notably since late last year, which should marginally make RMB assets more attractive in the near term. Nonetheless, the broad trend of the dollar against other majors will remain the dominant force setting the USD/CNY cross rate. The PBoC still faces challenges to contain capital outflows and maintain exchange rate stability. Chart 6Private Loan Rate Needs ##br##To Drop Further Private Loan Rate Needs To Drop Further Private Loan Rate Needs To Drop Further Chart 7China - U.S. Interest Rate Gap And##br## USD/CNY China - U.S. Interest Rate Gap And USD/CNY China - U.S. Interest Rate Gap And USD/CNY Yan Wang, Senior Vice President China Investment Strategy yanw@bcaresearch.com 1 Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "A Closer Look At The PBoC's Balance Sheet," dated September 23, 2015, available at cis.bcaresearch.com. 2 Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "Growth Watch," dated January 19, 2017 available at cis.bcaresearch.com. Cyclical Investment Stance Equity Sector Recommendations

Highlights Weekly swings in U.S. inventories notwithstanding, we believe global storage is on track to draw ~ 10% by early- to mid-3Q17, which will have achieved the goal of the OPEC - Russia production Agreement negotiated late last year. This will not require an extension of the pact beyond June, based on our modeling. Unexpectedly high compliance by OPEC producers to agreed cuts is being offset somewhat by increased production in those states exempted from the deal. Strong oil consumption on the back of a synchronized global uptick in GDP growth, which started to emerge late last year, provides the impetus for sustained storage draws. Markets are overestimating offshore production's resilience, particularly in the U.S. Gulf, where we see material declines beginning to set in next year. Backwardation likely persists in 2018, absent a U.S. policy-induced USD rally that crimps EM demand and spurs production ex U.S. Energy: Overweight. The return of contango in the WTI forward curve gives us the opportunity to reset our strategic front-to-back position (long Dec/17 vs. short Dec/18) at tonight's close. Our balances assessment supports our view backwardation will return in the deferred part of the curve. Our Dec/19 short WTI vs. long Brent spread buy stop was elected at $0.07/bbl. Base Metals: Neutral. We remain neutral base metals, but are keeping a close watch on copper. Unions working at BHP's Escondida mine, the world's largest, are set to strike today. Negotiations resumed this week, following BHP's request for government mediation. Precious Metals: Neutral. We continue to look to get long gold at $1,180/oz. Ags/Softs: Underweight. Grain fundamentals remain unsupportive for a rally. We remain underweight. Feature Chart of the WeekGlobal Oil Storage On Track For 10% Drop Global Oil Storage On Track For 10% Drop Global Oil Storage On Track For 10% Drop Global oil storage levels remain on track to hit the ~ 10% draw targeted in last year's OPEC - Russia production Agreement by early- to mid-3Q17, weekly gyrations in U.S. inventories notwithstanding. This means an extension of the agreement beyond its June expiry will not be required. Early reports suggest compliance with the deal is unexpectedly high by OPEC states that agreed to cut production by up to 1.2mm b/d - exceeding 80% by various accounts. However, OPEC states not required to cut - Libya, Nigeria, and Iran - have increased production and partially offset those declines, which took total reductions in OPEC output to ~ 840k b/d, based on a Bloomberg tally last week.1 This brought total Cartel compliance to ~ 60% of the agreed cuts, which, as we noted in our 2017 Commodity Outlook in December, would be sufficient to achieve the Agreement's goal of pulling inventories in the OECD down by ~ 10% by 3Q17.2 Non-OPEC producers also appear to be complying with the Agreement. Notable among them is Russia, which is ahead of its commitment with cuts of close to 120k b/d in January, due partly to extreme cold in Siberian fields. We expect cuts in Russia to average 200k b/d in 1Q17, going to 300k b/d in 2Q17. These cuts will allow demand to outstrip supply in 1H17 and into year-end. By early- to mid-3Q17, draws to OECD storage of 300mm bbl can be expected, without extending the OPEC - Russia production agreement (Chart of the Week). We expect to see these cuts show up in OECD inventory data this month and next and continue into the end of 2017. For non-OECD states, the draws will show up in JODI data beginning in March.3 The physical deficits - i.e., supply less than demand - will force storage to draw, backwardating the WTI forward curve later this year (Chart 2).4 If markets are not surprised by a policy-induced rally in the USD on the back of a U.S. border-adjustment tax (BAT), or a too-aggressive tightening by the Fed as it seeks to normalize monetary policy, we expect the drawdown in inventories to continue keeping markets backwardated. Even with production returning to pre-Agreement levels in 2H17 in states with the capacity to expand and reliably sustain production - Gulf Arab producers, Russia and U.S. shales - we expect storage to continue to draw through the year and into 2018 (Chart 3). Chart 2We Continue To Expect Backwardation We Continue To Expect Backwardation We Continue To Expect Backwardation Chart 3Storage Drawdown On Track Storage Drawdown On Track Storage Drawdown On Track In 4Q16 the impact of the higher Kuwaiti and UAE output is apparent, along with higher Russian production. This put more crude on the market, which found its way into storage late in 4Q16 and early 1Q17, reversing the trend in draws seen earlier in 2H16. This put the market back in a temporary surplus condition, with the result being more storage will have to be worked off in 1H17 than our earlier estimates indicated. But these draws will occur, following the implementation of the production accord. Extending The KSA - Russia Deal Beyond June Is Unnecessary In our estimates, OPEC crude production increases by ~ 850k b/d in 2H17 versus 1H17 levels. Despite this recovery, the storage drawdown continues. Our modeling assumes Gulf OPEC will account for slightly more than +1mm b/d growth, and non-Gulf OPEC will see production continue to fall by 170k b/d. Russia's total liquids production goes from 10.95mm b/d in 1H17 to 11.34mm b/d in 2H17. We estimate U.S. shale production grows at an average rate of ~ 300k b/d in 2H17, while total U.S. liquids production increases 720k b/d over the same interval. Setting aside the possibility of a policy-induced rally in the USD on the back of too-aggressive Fed tightening or a border-adjusted tax becoming the law of the land, both of which would depress demand and raise production ex U.S., we expect the crude-oil market to remain backwardated next year. The globally synchronized upturn in GDP will keep demand robust, with growth coming in close to even with this year's rate of ~ 1.50mm b/d. We have global liquids production and OPEC crude output growing less than 1.0% next year. We believe the market is overestimating the resilience of offshore production next year, particularly in the U.S. Gulf, based on the stout performance put in last year and expected for this year. Our colleague Matt Conlan notes in BCA's Energy Sector Strategy, U.S. production growth since October has almost exclusively been from the Gulf of Mexico's new projects. Output in the Gulf continues to increase due to the lagged effect of final investment decisions made during 2012 - 2014, when WTI prices were consistently trading above $100/bbl. GOM production will peak in 2017 then decline in 2018 due to lack of new investments made since 2014. Indeed, as "increasing decline rates overwhelm a shrinking inventory of new projects, GOM production should peak sometime in 2017 and then start decreasing. The EIA's estimate for another 200,000 b/d increase in GOM production in 2017 seems overly-optimistic."5 Once this becomes apparent to the market, we believe backwardation will reassert itself and persist into 2018. The backwardation of the forward curve structure will affect U.S. shale production economics in 2018. However, our base case is for U.S. shale-oil production in the "Big Four" basins - Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken and Niobrara - to grow 700k b/d next year, given the current structure of the WTI forwards, which were taken higher along with the WTI price rally at the front of the curve. This triggered the revival of rig counts; however, we want to point out that different curve shapes at different price levels produce different expected rig-count responses.6 Chart 4Barring a Policy Shock Demand Will Remain Robust bca.ces_wr_2017_02_09_c4 bca.ces_wr_2017_02_09_c4 Global Demand Firing On All Cylinders Robust demand growth - ~ +1.50mm b/d in 2017 and 2018 in our modeling - provides the impetus for the continued draws in storage this year and next (Chart 4). We revised our demand estimates for 2015 - 16 in line with the IEA's just-revised assessment of global consumption published in its January 2017 Oil Market Report.7 The IEA brought 2016 oil demand growth up to 1.50mm b/d, in line with our earlier estimates, but significantly revised 2015 demand growth upward to 2.0mm b/d. The Agency expects higher prices to crimp demand this year, taking it to 1.30mm b/d; our estimate, however, is higher, largely on the back of the first global synchronized growth we've seen since the Global Financial Crisis, which will be supported by accommodative monetary conditions worldwide, all else equal.8 Investment Implications Our analysis suggests there will be no need to extend the OPEC - Russia production accord into 2H17. In addition, it reinforces our view markets will backwardate later this year and stay backwardated in 2018, provided we do not see a BAT-induced rally in the USD, or an overly aggressive Fed normalization trajectory. As we noted in previous research, a BAT would lift the value of the USD, which would lower demand ex U.S. and raise supply at the margin.9 We make the odds of a BAT becoming the law of the land in the U.S. this year 50:50, so this is a non-trivial risk. This would be unambiguously bearish for oil prices. While we do not expect oil to be included among the imported commodities subject to a BAT, we do, nonetheless, expect the imposition of a BAT to lift the USD by 10%. This, coupled with the 5% increase in the greenback we'd already penciled in due to the Fed's monetary-policy normalization, will lift the USD 15% if it goes through. Should this occur, we would be preparing for prices to again fall below $50/bbl and push back to the $40/bbl area, which would cause supply and capex to once again contract significantly. That said, we are reinstating our long front-to-back WTI recommendation (long Dec/17 WTI vs. short Dec/18 WTI), given our updated balances assessment. Our expectation for inventories to continue to draw after the OPEC - Russia production-cutting agreement expires in June supports this recommendation. In addition, if we do see a BAT in the U.S., we believe markets will take the deferred WTI curve significantly lower in expectation of reduced demand and higher marginal supplies that almost surely will ensue in 2018. While the Dec/17 contract also will trade lower, more damage to prices will occur in 2018 contracts. Robert P. Ryan, Senior Vice President Commodity & Energy Strategy rryan@bcaresearch.com 1 Please see "OPEC Cuts Oil Output, But More Work Needed to Fulfill Deal," published by Bloomberg February 2, 2017. Iraq stands out among OPEC producers agreeing to cut, but apparently not following through as diligently as the rest of the Gulf Arab states; we are assuming production of 4.5mm b/d for 1H17, going to 4.6mm b/d in 2H17 for Iraq. 2 Please see BCA Research's Commodity & Energy Strategy "2017 Commodity Outlook: Energy," dated December 8, 2016, available at ces.bcaresearch.com. 3 JODI refers to the Joint Organisations Data Initiative, a supranational producer-consumer oil-market data provider headquartered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 4 "Backwardation" describes a forward price curve in which the price for a commodity for prompt delivery (e.g., tomorrow) exceeds the price of a commodity delivered in the future (e.g., next year). It is the opposite of a contango curve structure. 5 Please see issue of BCA Research's Energy Sector Strategy "Gulf Of Mexico Oil Production Likely To Peak In 2017," dated January 11, 2017, available nrg.bcaresearch.com. 6 In next week's report, we will present scenario analysis of shale-oil production as a function of WTI forward curve shape - i.e., the implications of backwardation for shale rig counts. This will update our assessments of price sensitivities to interest rates and USD movements. 7 Please see the IEA's Oil Market Report of 19 January 2017. 8 We discuss this in last week's Commodity & Energy Strategy feature article entitled "Gold Will Perform...," dated February 2, 2017, available at ces.bcaresearch.com. 9 Please see BCA Research's Commodity & Energy Strategy "Taking A BAT To Commodities," dated January 26, 2017, available at ces.bcaresearch.com. Investment Views and Themes Recommendations Strategic Recommendations Tactical Trades Commodity Prices and Plays Reference Table Trades Closed In 2017 Summary of Trades Closed in 2016