Financial Markets

The Fed says that to get back to 2 percent inflation, the US unemployment rate must increase by ‘just’ 0.6 percent through 2023-24. All well and good you might think, except that the Fed is forecasting something that has been unachievable for at least 75 years! Is the Fed gaslighting us? And what does it mean for investment strategy?

This week, we present our quarterly review of the BCA Research Global Fixed Income Strategy (GFIS) model bond portfolio for Q3/2022. We also discuss the model portfolio’s expected performance over next 3-6 months after our recent moves to reduce overall duration exposure and increase the underweight to US Treasuries.

We remain bearish on equities. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon that is embedded and perpetuated by a wage-price spiral. The Fed will “keep at it until the job is done.” Economic growth is slowing, and an earnings recession as soon as the end of this year is highly likely. US equities are not cheap and rising rates and slowing earnings growth will take their toll on performance. Don’t fight the Fed!

Investors should go long US treasuries and stay overweight defensive versus cyclical sectors, large caps versus small caps, and aerospace/defense stocks. Regionally we favor the US, India, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, while disfavoring China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, eastern Europe, and the Middle East.

This week’s <i>Global Investment Strategy</i> report titled Fourth Quarter 2022 Strategy Outlook: A Three-Act Play discusses the outlook for the global economy and financial markets for the rest of 2022 and beyond.

In Section I, we note that the Fed’s new interest rate projections show that US monetary policy is set to rise soon into restrictive territory even relative to what we consider to be the neutral rate of interest, and to a level that has been consistent with the onset of recession since the 1960s. Imminent supply-side and pandemic-related disinflation is crucial for the US to avoid a recession over the coming year. Stay neutral stocks versus bonds for now, but the next shift in our recommended asset allocation stance is more likely to be a downgrade to underweight rather than an upgrade to overweight. In Section II, a guest piece from our European Investment Strategy service discusses the outlook for European assets.

Special Report

Dear Client, This month’s Special Report has been written by my colleagues Mathieu Savary and Jeremie Peloso, of BCA’s European Investment Strategy service. The report was published in that service on September 26, and addressed the outlook for European assets. The EUR/USD stop buy mentioned in the report has since been triggered, meaning that our European Investment Strategy service is now long the euro with a stop loss position at 0.94. Although this is a tactical position for that service, it is consistent with the view expressed in Section 1 of our report that the dollar has significantly overshot versus the euro what currency fundamentals would imply. I trust you will find their report both interesting and insightful. Jonathan LaBerge, CFA The Bank Credit Analyst Highlights The outlook for European assets is uniquely muddled. European energy prices will remain elevated, but the worst of the adjustment is already behind us. The global economy is teetering on the edge of a recession and weak global growth is historically very negative for European assets. However, European valuations and earnings forecasts already discount an extremely severe outcome for global growth. A hawkish Fed should support the dollar, but investors increasingly realize foreign central banks are fighting inflation equally aggressively. The dollar already anticipates a global recession. Meantime, European credit offers a large spread pickup over sovereigns and even appears as a decent alternative to equities. Within a credit portfolio, we adopt a more cautious approach towards European investment grade bonds (IG) relative to their US counterpart. Instead, we recommend favoring UK IG over Euro Area IG as well as Swedish IG relative to US IG. Feature Following the hawkishness that transpired from the Fed press conference and revised forecasts last week, EUR/USD plunged below 0.99 and hit a 20-year low. Moreover, President Vladimir Putin’s announcement of a broader mobilization of the Russian army is stoking fears that the Ukrainian conflict will only be prolonged. The prospects of a lengthier war and greater energy market shock are raising further worries for Europe’s growth outlook, which weighs on European asset prices, notably the euro and the pound. The odds of a global financial accident are on the rise. Global central banks have joined the Fed and are relentlessly tightening global monetary and financial conditions. Moreover, the surging dollar is adding to global risks by raising the cost of capital around the world. This is a very fragile situation and the odds of a global recession have jumped significantly. Against this backdrop, investors should continue to overweight defensive equities at the expense of cyclical stocks. The euro also has more downside, but we are issuing a tentative stop-buy at EUR/USD 0.9650 with a stop at 0.9400. Credit remains a safer alternative to European stocks. The Evolving European Energy Backdrop Chart II-1All About The Gas The surge of natural gas and electricity prices since the fall of 2021 has been one of the main drivers of the underperformance of European assets and the fall in the euro (Chart II-1). While the medium-term outlook for European energy prices remains fraught with risk, the near-term prospects have improved. Following a surge from €77.4/MWh in June to €340/MWh on August 26, one-month forward natural gas prices at the Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF) have declined 45% to €187/MWh. These wild gyrations reflect the evolution of both the natural gas flows from Russia, which have fallen from 3,060Mcm to 599 Mcm today, and the rapid buildup of natural gas inventories across the European Union. The good news is that the costly efforts to rebuild European gas inventories have been successful. EU-wide inventories are at 85.6% capacity, achieving its 80% storage objective well before November. Germany has gone even further, with storage use now standing at 90% of capacity. This large stockpile, along with the re-opening of coal power plants and consumption curtailment efforts, should allow Europe to survive the winter without Russian energy imports, as long as the temperatures are not abnormally cold. The absence of a summer dip in Norwegian gas exports and the surge in LNG flows to Europe have partially replaced the missing Russian inflows, thus helping Europe rapidly rebuild its natural gas inventories (Chart II-2). This success was a consequence of elevated European natural gas prices, which have allowed Europe to absorb LNG flows from the rest of the world (Chart II-3). Chart II-2No Restocking Without LNG Chart II-3LNG Flowed Toward High Prices     So far, the European industrial sector has managed to adjust better than expected to the jump in the price of natural gas, a crucial energy input. Take Germany as an example. For the month of August, Germany’s consumption of natural gas by the industrial sector fell 22% below the 2018-2021 average (Chart II-4, top panel), while PPI moved up vertically. Yet, industrial output is only down 5% year-on-year and industrial capacity utilization stands at 85%, which is still a level that beats two thirds of the readings recorded between 1990 and this the most recent quarter (Chart II-4, bottom panel). The adjustment will be uneven across various industries, with those most voracious of natural gas likely to experience a declining share of Europe’s gross value added. Using the German example once again, we can see that the chemicals, basic metal manufacturing, and paper products sectors are the most at risk from higher natural gas prices and most likely therefore to suffer the most from gas rationing this winter (Chart II-5). Chart II-4A Surprisingly Successful Transition Chart II-5The Three Sectors Most At Risk   Going forward, important changes are likely to take place that will allow the European economy to continue to survive on diminished Russian gas flows: European natural gas prices will remain elevated compared to the rest of the world to attract LNG flows to the region. Importantly, Europe’s capacity to absorb these flows keeps increasing, as more re-gasification ships are docked around the continent. Moreover, North America is building more facilities to export LNG to Europe. Chart II-6Nuclear Energy's Contribution Will Rebound Nuclear electricity production will rebound. Currently, the EU’s nuclear production is around 43.2TWh, well below the normal 60TWh to 70TWh winter levels, driven mostly by the collapse in French production from 35TWh to 18TWh (Chart II-6). This decline in nuclear electricity generation has accentuated the upward pressure on European natural gas and electricity prices. One of the key objectives of the nationalization of EDF by the French government is to accelerate the maintenance of France’s ageing nuclear power plants and allow a return to more normal production levels by the winter. The role of natural gas in European household’s energy mix will decline. Currently, EU households are the largest natural gas consumers and account for 41% of the bloc’s gas consumption (Chart II-7). It will be easier to replace their natural gas consumption over time with other sources of energy than it will be to cut the industrial sector’s consumption extensively. As a result, even if European natural gas imports are permanently below 2021 levels, the industrial sector will not bear the brunt of the adjustment. Chart II-7Households To Be Displaced These developments imply that natural gas prices have limited downside. However, we believe that the worst of the spike in prices is behind us, at least over the near term. The reason is that the inelastic buying created by the inventory re-stocking exercise since May 2022 is ending. In fact, the German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, Robert Habeck, declared last week that his country would no longer purchase gas at any price. Chart II-8The Most Painful Part Of The Adjustment Is Over If prices stabilize around €200/MWh, European industrial activity will continue to face a headwind, but the worst of the adjustment process will be in the rearview mirror as natural gas inflation recedes (Chart II-8). Ultimately, capitalist systems are dynamic, and it is this rapid change in price that causes the most pain. In other words, the impoverishment of the European private sector has already happened. Steady states are easier to manage. Moreover, if natural gas prices eventually follow the future’s curve (this is a big “if”), the picture for Europe will improve considerably. One additional mitigating factor should ease the pain being experienced by the European private sector. Fiscal policy is responding very aggressively to the current energy crisis. So far, EU countries and the UK have allocated more than €500 billion to protect their private sectors against higher energy costs (Chart II-9) and the UK just announced tax cuts of £45 billion. This is in addition to the disbursement of €150 billion from the NGEU funds in 2023. Moreover, the European commission is planning to modify the EU fiscal rules to abandon annual structural deficit targets and for debt sustainability to be evaluated over a ten-year period. Bottom Line: The worst of Europe’s adjustment to higher energy prices is now behind us. However, European energy prices will remain elevated, which will continue to put Europe at a handicap compared to the rest of the world. Chart II-9Massive Fiscal Support Bad News From The Rest Of The World Chart II-10A Global Recession This Way Comes The worst of Europe’s energy crisis is behind us, but the world is teetering toward a recession, which will hurt the trade- and manufacturing-sensitive European economy. The tightening in global financial conditions created by the surge in the dollar and by the jump in global yields is pushing the US Manufacturing ISM and the Euro Area PMIs toward the low-40s, which is consistent with a recession (Chart II-10). The problem does not stop there. Global central banks have become solely focused on fighting inflation. For 2023, the FOMC’s dot plot forecasts both an interest rate rise to 4.6% and a 0.7% increase in the unemployment rate. This is tantamount to the Fed telling the market that it will increase interest rates as a recession emerges to repress inflation. Not to be undone, European central banks are also rapidly increasing their policy rates, even as they also forecast an imminent deterioration in domestic growth conditions. Quickly tightening policy in a slowing growth environment, especially as the dollar hits a 20-year high, is a recipe for a financial accident and a global recession. Chart II-11No Help From China Moreover, China’s economy is still unable to create a positive offset to the deterioration in global monetary and financial conditions. The marginal propensity of China’s private sector to consume remains in a downtrend, hampered by the country’s zero-COVID policy and the continuing meltdown in real estate activity (Chart II-11). Furthermore, the most rapid decline in the yuan exchange rate in 5 years is imparting an additional downside risk to the global economy. European stocks are uniquely exposed to these threats. Europe overweights deep cyclicals, which are currently squeezed by the deteriorating global growth outlook. The message from the collapse in FedEx’s stocks on very poor guidance is particularly ominous: this company has a much closer correlation with the Dow Jones Euro STOXX 50 than with the S&P 500 (Chart II-12). European share prices are already factoring in much of the bad news. Valuations are significantly less expensive than they once were. The Shiller P/E ratio of European equities and their equity risk premium stand at the same levels as those in the 1980s. This is in sharp contrast to the US (Chart II-13). Chart II-12FedEx's Gloomy Delivery Chart II-13Low CAPE In Europe   European forward earnings have also already done considerable work adjusting downward. Excluding energy, 2022 and 2023 forward EPS are down 11.7% and 13.3% since their peak, respectively (Table II-1). But inflation flatters earnings growth and European large-cap indices are dominated by multinational firms, which implies that looking at earnings in USD terms makes more sense. In both real and USD terms, 2022 and 2023 forward EPS, excluding energy, are already down 28.7% and 30.1%, respectively. These adjustments are in line with previous recessions. Table II-1A Deep Downgrade To European Earnings The counterargument is that analysts still expect positive earnings growth in 2023 relative to 2022. However, at 4%, this increase in expected earnings is still well below inflation and 6% below the average expected growth in forward earnings recorded over the past 35 years (Chart II-14). Additionally, a global recession could put further downward pressure on energy prices in Europe, which would create an additional cushion under European earnings in 2023. The implication here is that it still makes sense to be modestly long European equities in absolute terms, especially for investors with an investment horizon of twelve months or more. However, we cannot be complacent, as the risk of an additional selloff is still too large for comfort. As a result, for now investors should only garner a small exposure to European equities and do so while favoring defensive names over cyclical ones (Chart II-15). Chart II-14Weak Forward Earnings Growth Chart II-15Continue To Favor Defensive Names   Bottom Line: European stocks must still contend with the growing threat of a global recession catalyzed by tighter financial conditions and aggressive global central banks. The good news is that they already discount considerable pessimism, as illustrated by their low valuations and downgraded forward earnings. Consequently, investors can continue to nibble at European equities, but do so to a limited degree and by favoring defensive stocks over cyclical ones, at least for now. The Euro Dilemma On the back of the very hawkish Fed meeting and the announcement of Russia’s broadened military mobilization, the EUR/USD broke below the 0.99 support level and fell under 0.98, a level we judged in the past as very attractive on a six-to-nine months basis. Obviously, Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s reaffirmation of the FOMC’s war on inflation is a major boost to the dollar. The momentum property of the greenback implies that it has room to rally further in the near term. This narrative, however, overlooks the fact that the Fed is not the only central bank intent on fighting inflation, no matter the cost. The Norges Bank, the Riksbank, the ECB, and even the SNB have all showed their willingness to move aggressively against inflation. While the BoE only increased rates by 50bps last week, its communication suggested that an at least 75bps increase would be due at the November meeting, when the MPC publishes its Monetary Policy report that will incorporate the impact of the budget measures announced by new British Prime Minister, Liz Truss. As a result, market interest rate expectations are climbing in the US, but they are rising even faster in Europe, albeit from a lower base. However, the decline in the expected rate of interest in the US relative to Europe and in the number of expected hikes in the US relative to Europe are consistent with a sharp decline in the DXY in the coming months (Chart II-16). Due to its 80% weight in European currencies, a weaker DXY implies a rebound in the EUR, GBP, CHF, NOK, and SEK against the USD. Moreover, there could be room for expected interest rate differentials to narrow further against the dollar. The analysis we published two weeks ago shows that, even when the different nonfinancial private debt loads are accounted for, the gap in the US and Eurozone r-star stands at 1%. However, the spread between the Fed funds rate’s upper bound and the ECB Deposit Rate is 2%. The gap between the July 2023 US and Eurozone OIS is 1.7%. Since European inflation may prove more stubborn than that of the US in the near term, there is scope for the expected interest rate gap to narrow further, especially as the Euro Area final domestic demand is surprisingly more robust than that of the US (Chart II-17). Chart II-16The Rest Of The World Is Catching Up To The Fed Chart II-17Surprising European Resilience   What about global growth? The view that the global economy is about to experience a recession is consistent with a stronger dollar, since the greenback is an extremely countercyclical currency. However, the DXY’s 25% rally since January 2021 already prices in such an outcome (Chart II-18). Similarly, the euro is trading again at 2002 levels, which is also in line with a global recession with deep negative repercussions for the Eurozone. Additionally, the Euro has fallen 21% since May 2021, which compares to the 21.4% fall in 2008, the 20% decline in 2010, the 18% plunge in 2011/12 and the 24% collapse in 2014/15; yet EUR/USD is much cheaper now than in any of those instances. Moreover, the wide difference between the competitiveness of Germany and that of the rest of the Euro Area has now faded, which means that a major handicap against the euro has disappeared (Chart II-19). Chart II-18The Dollar Already Foresees A Recession Chart II-19Normalizing Eurozone Internal Competitiveness     This does not mean that the euro is not without risk. First, since the major euro collapse began in June 2021, EUR/USD breakdowns have been followed by average declines of 3.6%, ranging from 2.7% to 4.2%. Since the dollar is a momentum currency, it is unlikely that this time will be different. Second, if the tightening in global policy does cause a financial accident, the dollar will catch one last major bid that could push EUR/USD toward 0.9. As a result, to mitigate the danger, we recommend setting a stop-buy in the euro at EUR/USD 0.965 or 2.6% below the breakdown level of 0.9904. This position comes with a stop-loss at 0.94. For now, we would view this bet as a tactical position if it were triggered. Bottom Line: While a hawkish FOMC is very positive for the dollar, markets now expect foreign central banks to catch up to some extent with the Fed. This process is dollar bearish. Additionally, while a global recession would be supportive of the greenback, the USD already discounts this scenario. Instead, Europe is proving surprisingly resilient, which could soon create a tailwind for EUR/USD. Set a stop-buy at EUR/USD 0.965, with a stop-loss at 0.94. Market Update: European Credit After Central Bank Week For investors concerned with the left-tail risk in European equities, European credit offers a credible alternative in the near term. This asset class is also attractive relative to European government bonds. Chart II-20Central Bank Week Taken together, the Fed, the ECB, the BoE, the Riksbank, the Norges Bank, the SNB, and the BoC have tightened policy by 475bps over the past month (Chart II-20). Moreover, the SNB’s hike closed the chapter of negative rates in Europe. But make no mistake – there will be a second chapter. Until then, European corporate bond yields have risen enough to offer attractive spreads over duration-matched government bonds and to challenge the earnings yield provided by equities (Chart II-21). Besides, the volatility observed in equity markets over the past few months makes the European corporate bond more appealing. In the Euro Area, BB-rated bonds, which are the highest credit quality and largest tranche within the high-yield space, are particularly attractive. They sport a 6.6% YTM, at a spread of 480bps over 3-year German government bond yields. This compares to an equity earnings yield of 7.4% (Chart II-21, top panel). In other European corporate bond markets, there is no need to go down in credit quality. Yields-to-maturity for investment grade corporate bonds in the UK, Sweden, and Switzerland provide appealing alternatives to equities, with shorter duration still. This is especially true in Sweden, where the equity earnings yield has collapsed and is now only 60bps above Swedish IG yield, with substantially greater risk. Meanwhile, the spread pickup offered by Swiss IG over Swiss government bonds of similar duration is at its widest in more than ten years (Chart II-21, bottom panel). This week, we turn neutral on European credit versus US credit. Back in March, we made the case that European credit would outperform its US counterpart in response to a more hawkish Fed than the ECB. Since then, European IG outperformed US IG by 1% on a total return basis. However, with the Fed funds rate at 3.25%, traders now expect more monetary policy tightening from the ECB, which often corresponds to an underperformance of Euro Area credit relative to that of the US (Chart II-22, top panel). On the other hand, Swedish IG is expected to outperform US IG over the next six months (Chart II-22, bottom panel). Chart II-21Push Back Against TINA Argument Chart II-22Heed The Message From OIS Curve Differentials         Mathieu Savary, Chief European Strategist Mathieu@bcaresearch.com Jeremie Peloso, Editor/Strategist JeremieP@bcaresearch.com Footnotes

Special Report

Please note I will be hosting a live webcast on September 29, 2022 at 9:00 AM HKT for the APAC region. I will discuss the global/China/EM macro outlooks and financial market implications. For clients in the Americas and EMEA, we had a webcast on September 28, 2022. You can access the replay via this link. Arthur Budaghyan Executive Summary Global Semi Stock Prices: Further Downside Ahead Global semiconductor stock prices are still vulnerable to meaningful downside over the next three months. Global semi consumption will contract due to the corresponding waning demand of smartphones, personal computers, and other consumer electronics. Global semi demand in sectors of automobiles and datacenters will continue growing. However, such an increase in demand cannot offset the demand reduction in other sectors. Semiconductor consumption in China has entered a contraction phase.  Semiconductor inventories have swelled. Alongside a sharp upsurge in chip production capacity, this increase in inventories will lead to chip price deflation in the next nine months. Nevertheless, the structural outlook for global semiconductor demand remains constructive. We are waiting for a better entry point for semi stocks.  Bottom Line: There is more downside in global semiconductor share prices as well as Taiwanese and Korean tech stocks. We will seek to recommend buying semiconductor stocks when a more material decline in semi companies’ profits is priced in their share prices. At the moment, we are downgrading Taiwanese stocks from neutral to underweight relative to the EM equity benchmark but are maintaining an overweight stance on the Korean bourse within an EM equity portfolio.   The global semiconductor equity index is breaking below its technical support (Chart 1). The implication is that these share prices are in an air pocket and investors should not chase a declining market. Based on previous cycles, we expect global semiconductor stocks to bottom late this year or early next year and semi sales to trough in 2023Q2. In the previous five cycles, global semi stocks always bottomed before global semi sales and lead times varied from three-to-six months. Chart 2 shows that Taiwan’s semiconductor new export orders lead global semi sales by about three months, and they continue to point to considerable downside in the global semi-industry. Chart 1Global Semi Stocks: Breaking Down Chart 2Global Semi Sales: More Downside Ahead The semiconductor industry has a history of cyclicality. Shortages have been followed by oversupply, which has led to declining prices, revenues, and profits for semi producers. This time is no exception Global Semi Sales: A Cyclical Slump Underway Global semiconductor demand began its downward trajectory in May of this year and will continue to slide in the next three-to-six months. Both the volume and value of China’s semiconductor imports are in a deep contraction and China’s imports from Taiwan have also plummeted (Chart 3). China is the world’s largest consumer of semiconductors, accounting for 35% of global demand. We expect semi sales to remain in contraction in China and to shrink in regions outside China in the next six-to-nine months (Chart 4).  Chart 3China's Semi Imports Plummeted Chart 4Semi Sales Will Contract Across Regions There are several important reasons for the retrenchment worldwide. First, the lockdowns around the world in 2020 and 2021 generated an unprecedented increase in online activities and a corresponding surge in demand for smartphones/PCs/tablets/game consoles/electronic gadgets. This was the main driving force for the boom in global semiconductor sales from 2020Q3 to 2022Q1. The excessive demand for consumer goods and electronics has run its course and global demand will sag in the next six months. As we have been contending since early this year, global exports are set to contract. Households that bought these goods in the past two years probably will not make new purchases in the near term. In addition, declining real disposable income and rising interest rates will constrain consumer spending. Smartphones, PCs, tablets, home appliances, and other household electronic goods consume about half of global semi output. In addition, rising job uncertainties resulting from China’s dynamic zero-COVID policy and slowing household income growth will curb consumption within China. Here are our takeaways for each segment: Chart 5China's Output Of Mobile Phones And PCs Has Been Shrinking Mobile phones: Mobile phones are the largest contributor to global semi sales, with a share of 31% as of 2021, based on the data from World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS). According to the International Data Corporation (IDC), global smartphone shipments are set to decline by 6.5% year-over-year in volume terms in 2022. Smartphone OEMs cut their orders drastically in 2022 because of high inventories and low demand, with no signs of an immediate recovery. China accounts for 67% of global mobile phone production and its mobile phone production has been contracting (Chart 5, top panel).   Traditional PCs and tablets: Based on data from the IDC, global traditional PC1  and tablet shipments are set to decline by 12.8% year-over-year in 2022 and by an additional 2.6% next year in volume terms. Computer production in China, which is the world’s largest computer producer and exporter, also shows massive downsizing (Chart 5, bottom panel).   Home appliances: China is also the largest producer and exporter of air conditioners (ACs), washing machines, refrigerators, and freezers. Except for a slight growth in AC output in response to heatwaves in China and Europe, China’s output of other home appliances will shrink. Globally, these industries accounted for about half of all semiconductor sales in 2021. Given the overconsumption of these goods worldwide over the past two years, we expect a material decline in these sectors in the next six-to-nine months. Second, automobiles, servers, and industrial electronics, which together account for about 30% of global semi sales, will have positive single-digit growth going forward. Yet, such an increase will not be enough to offset the lost demand from the consumer electronic goods sector in the next six-to-nine months.  Chart 6Global Auto Production Will Rise Automotive (accounts for 11% of world chip demand): The chip shortage in this sector has eased only moderately. Auto output levels in major producing countries remain well below their pre-pandemic levels (Chart 6). In light of improved foundry capacity, semiconductor producers will be able to produce automotive chips and reduce lingering shortages. However, for most chips to automakers, there are no supply shortages. Only a small number of categories of automotive chips, such as microcontrollers (MCU) and insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBT), are still in tight supply. Given that the total automotive sector only accounted for about 5% of total global semi sales last year, the recovery in global automobile output will contribute only limited growth to global semi sales.   Servers (account for 10% of world chip demand): The surge in online activities resulted in greater demand for cloud services and remote work applications, both of which require computer servers. Total server demand is comprised of data servers for cloud providers and private enterprises, with the former as the main driving force in recent years.  Data center expansion among cloud service providers will be driven by 5G, automotive, cloud gaming, and high-performance computing. After expanding by 10% last year, the pace of annual growth in global server shipments will likely be more moderate, to about 5%-6% in the next couple of quarters.   Chart 7Global Industrial Demand For Chips Is Set to Decelerate Industrial electronics (account for 9% of world chip demand): The growth rate in semi demand for this sector is falling. The global manufacturing new order-to-inventory ratio has plunged, and global manufacturing production is set to decline for the rest of this year and through to 2023H1 (Chart 7). Nevertheless, given structural tailwinds for industrial electronics, we expect semi demand in this sector to dip to single-digit growth in the near term rather than to contract.  Third, with semiconductor inventories having surged, new orders for chips, and hence their production, will plummet.   The length and intensity of the chip shortage, which started in 2020H2, triggered stockpiling among a broad range of customers, including manufacturers of smartphones and other consumer electronics. Moreover, the recent slowdown in smartphone/PC demand increased the inventory of silicon chips. Chart 8Semiconductor Inventory Overhang China had also stockpiled semiconductors from 2020Q2 to 2021Q4. With faltering demand, the country will continue its destocking process in the next couple of quarters. Semiconductor inventories in Taiwan and Korea have surged, corroborating the fact that the current cyclical downturn in the global semi sector will be a severe one (Chart 8). Hence, businesses in the semi supply chain will continue to draw upon their inventories rather than increase their semiconductors orders. This will reduce semiconductor demand meaningfully in the coming months. Bottom Line: The cyclical slump in worldwide semiconductor sales has further to go, with the sector’s sale volumes and prices projected to contract in the next six months. Semi producers will experience a substantial decline in their profits. Comparing Cycles Previous cycles may provide insight in the downside of the cyclical slump in global semi sales. In the previous five cycles, global semi sales experienced a contraction, ranging from 7% to 45% (Table 1). In the current cycle, global semi sales still had 7% year-over-year growth in 2022Q2 (Chart 9). Table 1Six Cyclical Downturns In Global Semiconductor Market Chart 9Global Semi Stocks And Global Semi Sales Global Semiconductor Market: Sales & Share Prices In fact, the current downturn could be deeper than the one between 2018 and 2019 (when sales contracted by 16%) for the following reasons: Sales of both cell phones and PCs will likely dwindle further this time than they did in 2018 to 2019. The pandemic boosted demand for consumer electronics, but this also brought forward future demand. In comparison with 2018, the current cycle might have a longer replacement cycle for mobile phones and PCs. Unlike 2019, global demand for consumer goods will likely contract rather than decelerate. This has ramifications for the duration and magnitude of the semi downturn.   Economic growth, and job and income uncertainties in China are much worse now than they were between 2018 and 2019. These factors will likely lead to a bigger cut in IT spending by both consumers and businesses, resulting in a larger downturn in global semi demand in this cycle. The tech battle between the US and China is more intense than in it was from 2018 to 2019. In mid-2018, the U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on Chinese imports of semiconductor goods, including machines and flat panel displays. China retaliated by imposing its own 25% tariff on U.S. exports of semiconductor goods, such as test equipment. This month, the US imposed new restrictions on NVIDIA and AMD in relation to selling artificial intelligence chips to Chinese customers. The US also plans to curb further its shipments of chipmaking tools to China. These plans will cut China’s imports of high-end semi products, for which producers enjoy high profit margins. In addition, the shortage of these chips will stall the development and sales of many consumer products within China, which will thereby reduce demand for other types of chips needed for consumer products. Chart 10Rapid Semi Capacity Expansion Worldwide Global semi capacity expansion has recently been much stronger in current cycle than it was in the 2016-2018 cycle. This may lead to a bigger supply surplus in this cycle than in the last one. It takes about 18-24 months, on average, to build a new semiconductor fabrication plant. Thus, large capital expenditures by semi producers in 2021-22 entail considerable new supply in 2023-24. According to IC Insights, the annual wafer capacity growth rates were 6.5% in 2020, 8.5% in 2021 and 8.7% in 2022. This compares with 4%-6.5% between 2016 and 2018 (Chart 10). Rapid capacity expansion typically leads to price deflation for chips and is therefore negative for the semi producers’ profitability and their share prices. Are global semi stock prices already pricing bad news? We do not think so. Nearly all major players saw a drop in revenues in the past cycle. In sharp contrast, only Intel’s revenues have dropped so far in the current cycle (Chart 11). Global semi stock prices will continue falling as companies report shrinking sales and earnings in the next couple of quarters. In former cycles when global semi stocks bottomed, investor sentiment – as measured by the net EPS revisions – was more downbeat than it is currently (Chart 12). Chart 11More Semi Companies' Sales Are Likely To Contract Chart 12Global Semi Stock Prices: Net EPS To Drop More Bottom Line: The global semiconductor sector’s cyclical slump could be deeper than it was in the 2018-2019 cycle. Hence, shares prices will fall considerably more than they did in late 2018. Ramifications For Taiwanese And Korean Markets Taiwanese and Korean semiconductor stock prices will probably continue to fall in absolute terms. The former recently broke its three-year moving average and the latter its six-year moving average (Chart 13). Chart 13Taiwanese And Korean Semi Stock Prices Will Fall Further Chart 14TSMC: Smartphone And HPC Make 81% Of Revenue For TSMC, the smartphone sector still accounts for 38% of revenues (Chart 14). Hence, a contraction in global smartphone sales in the next six-to-nine months could hurt the company’s top and bottom lines considerably. Meanwhile, the high-performance computing (HPC) sector became the largest contributor of TSMC revenues with a 43% share. A slowdown in data center investment and a decrease in GPU demand due to falling bitcoin prices will also materially affect the company’s profitability. In addition, the US government’s AI chips export restriction policy will decrease NVIDIA and AMD AI sales to China. According to NVIDIA’s news release, approximately US$400 million in potential chip sales to China (including Hong Kong) will likely be subject to this new restriction. AI chips are manufactured by TSMC with its advanced node technology and have a high-profit margin. Hence, the new policy will negatively impact TSMC’s revenues and profits. For Samsung, the memory market is in a free-fall due to plummeting demand (Chart 15). TrendForce expects the average overall DRAM price to drop by 13-18% in 2022Q4 because of high inventories in the supply chain and stagnant demand. The semi shipment-to-inventories ratios for both Taiwan and South Korea nosedived, pointing to lower semi stock prices in these two markets (Chart 16). Chart 15Samsung: Vulnerable To Sinking Prices Of Memory Chips Chart 16Semi Shipments-to-Inventory Ratios Plunged In Taiwan And Korea Bottom Line: Both TSMC and Samsung stock prices have more downside over the next three months.  Equity Valuations And Investment Conclusions The global semiconductor stock index in USD terms has tumbled by 45% from its recent peak. Multiples of semiconductor stocks are near their long-term average levels (Chart 17 and 18). These multiples could undershoot as they did in 2018-2019, which means even more downside is ahead. Chart 17Multiples Of Semi Stocks Could Undershoot Chart 18Multiples Of Semi Stocks Could Undershoot Aside from the profit outlook, higher US bond yields are also causing multiple compression for global semiconductor stocks (Chart 19). As to the allocation to semi stocks within an EM equity portfolio, we recommend downgrading Taiwan from a neutral allocation to underweight and reiterate an overweight stance on the KOSPI. The US-China geopolitical confrontation will escalate in the coming years and Taiwan is at the epicenter of this. These are relative calls, that is against the EM benchmark (Chart 20). We remain negative on their absolute performance. Chart 19Higher US Bond Yields = Multiple Compression In Global Semi Stocks Chart 20Downgrade Taiwan To Underweight Relative To The EM Benchmark   Finally, the structural outlook for global semiconductor demand remains constructive. We are waiting for a better entry point. We would recommend buying semiconductor stocks after pricing in a more material contraction in semi companies’ revenues and profits. Ellen JingYuan He Associate Vice President ellenj@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1     Traditional PCs are comprised of desktops, notebooks and workstations.

Executive Summary Biden And Democrats Arrest Fall In Public Opinion US policy is essential to the global macro, policy, and geopolitical outlook in the fourth quarter. Our three key views for 2022 are still in place: the Biden administration is facing congressional gridlock and shifting to executive action and foreign policy. Gridlock will be marginally positive for the stock market but foreign policy crises and additional energy shocks will be very negative. Stay defensive.  Our three long-term strategic themes – Generational Change, Peak Polarization, and Limited Big Government – are still on track but the first two will take a back seat during the 2022-24 election cycle. Investors should stay overweight defensive sectors versus cyclicals, large caps versus small caps, cyber security, aerospace/defense, oil and gas transportation/storage, and renewable energy. Go tactically long US treasuries but keep the US dollar on watch for a downgrade. Recommendation (Tactical) INITIATION DATE Return Long DXY (Dollar Index) Feb 23, 2022 18.6% Bottom Line: US policy uncertainty will rise then fall over the course of the midterm election, which will produce gridlock. Gridlock is neutral toward inflation, or disinflationary, and a boon for stocks. But geopolitical risk can still wreak havoc and investors should stay defensive. Feature Market-relevant geopolitical analysis begins with the United States, which remains the critical actor in the international system – as reflected today by the US dollar’s extraordinary bull run both in times of global deflation and inflation (Chart 1). Investors need a base case for US national policy over the course of the 2022-24 election cycle to form a base case for global policy and the macroeconomic and financial outlook. Our annual outlook last December argued that the US had entered a period of greater government involvement in the economy and yet that the Biden administration would face rising checks and balances over the course of 2022 due to thin majorities in Congress, midterm elections, an inflationary macroeconomic environment, and an unstable geopolitical backdrop. Chart 1Dollar Strong During Deflation And Inflation This forecast is largely intact today so the question is whether these checks and balances will inhibit inflation going forward. Biden has achieved significant liberal policy spending but now looks to be seriously constrained, having little ability to pass domestic legislation going forward. However, he faces three foreign policy crises (Ukraine, Taiwan, Iran), all of which are inflationary on the margin. In the coming months Biden’s foreign policy crises could morph into larger global supply shocks, most notably energy shocks from Russia and/or Iran. New shocks could kill demand and tip the economy into recession. If these risks fail to materialize, tighter monetary policy will reduce inflation but likely also at the cost of higher unemployment and recession. While we will maintain our defensive positioning, we may book some gains on bearish trades over the course of the fourth quarter, namely if we see compelling signs of US political and geopolitical risk subsiding and inflation rolling over. But we do not see that yet. Checking Up On Our Three Key Views For 2022 Here we update our three key views for 2022. We show how they have developed so far this year and what we expect in the final quarter: 1.   From Single-Party Rule To Gridlock: In the third quarter the Biden administration made a “last ditch effort” to turn around its fortunes ahead of the midterm election, mainly by focusing on fighting inflation. This effort succeeded in stabilizing support for Biden and the Democratic Party in opinion polls, albeit at low levels (Chart 2). The midterm is usually a check against the party in power and its major policy victories. In 2006 anti-war Democrats imposed a check on the Bush Republicans and the war in Iraq. In 2010 and 2014 Tea Party Republicans imposed a check on Obama Democrats and government intervention into health care. In 2018 anti-Trump Democrats imposed a check on Trump Republicans and tax cuts. In early 2022 the election was shaping up to be a referendum on the Biden Democrats and inflationary spending. But the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade has muddied the usually clear pattern of the “midterm curse.” In critical swing states a majority of voters opposes extensive new restrictions on abortion access (Chart 3). Chart 2Biden And Democrats Arrest Fall In Public Opinion Chart 3Swing States Support Abortion Access Young voters and women are especially motivated to vote for Democrats in reaction to the high court’s ruling (Chart 4). However, so far support for the Democrats among these groups is still lower than it was in 2020-21. And young people are not thrilled with old man Biden. Chart 4Youth And Women’s Support For Democrats Chart 5Voters Care Most About Economy … Where Biden Scores Lowest As we enter the final stretch of the campaign, the president and his party receive the lowest grades on the economy, which is still voters’ top priority (Chart 5). Democrats face a negative cyclical backdrop and macroeconomic headwinds – namely falling real wages, incomes, and consumer confidence (Chart 6). In the House of Representatives, our quantitative election model considers how many seats the ruling party is defending, Congress’s net approval rating, and popular support for the two parties (the generic congressional ballot). The resulting estimate is that Democrats should lose 21 seats, whereas they only need to lose six to yield to Republican control (Table 1). Democrats can achieve a positive surprise and yet fail to retain control of the lower chamber. Chart 6Pocketbook Voter Is Frowning Table 1Our House Election Quant Model Predicts GOP Victory Democrats are more likely to retain the Senate but they cannot afford to lose a single seat on a net basis. State-level economic data, previous Senate margins of victory, presidential approval, the generic congressional ballot, and the tenure of Senate incumbents all suggest that Democrats will lose seats in Arizona and Georgia without gaining any seats, thus yielding control to Republicans. Yet this prediction from our quantitative election model necessarily excludes some of the idiosyncrasies of the 2022 election (Chart 7). Chart 7Our Senate Election Quant Model Favors GOP … But Too Close To Call By contrast, state-level opinion polls suggest that Democrats will hold the Senate: several critical Republican-leaning races are tied while Democrats have a large lead in Arizona (Charts 8A & 8B). In short, the Senate is too close to call. Chart 8ADemocrats Tied In Red-Leaning States, Leading In Blue-Leaning States Chart 8BDemocrats Tied In Red-Leaning States, Leading In Blue-Leaning States As long as Republicans gain one chamber the effect is the same: gridlock. The prevailing wind is voter discontent over inflation. The Misery Index (headline inflation plus unemployment) is reminiscent of the stagflationary 1970s and points to a negative outcome for Democrats in the House overall (Table 2). Table 2Misery Index Signals Democratic Losses To Come Hence the House will fall to the Republicans and single-party control will be broken. The federal spending spree will grind to a halt in 2023-24, which is positive for investors in an inflationary environment. For example, it is the opposite fiscal outcome from what is happening in the UK and Italy, where bonds are selling off sharply. 2.   From Legislative To Executive Power: We expected Biden and the Democrats to pass a second budget reconciliation bill, which ended up being the inaptly named Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law on August 16. After that we expected the president to shift to executive action as his legislative options dwindled. There have already been some signs of this shift to executive power, such as President Biden’s tapping of the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve to release 180 million barrels of oil, which helped lower gasoline prices before the election (Chart 9). Biden also relaxed some regulations on fossil fuel production in a reversal of his 2020 call for “phasing out” oil and natural gas. More generally Biden has imposed a large number of economically significant regulations relative to previous administrations (Chart 10). He also unilaterally forgave $420 billion worth of student debt over 30 years. Chart 9Biden Tapped Strategic Petroleum Reserve Chart 10Biden Flexes Regulatory Muscles This trend toward executive action will intensify if Congress is indeed gridlocked in 2023-24. It is marginally inflationary but likely to be outweighed by disinflationary fiscal drag in 2023. The same trend also feeds into the next point: Biden’s shift from domestic-oriented to foreign-oriented policy. 3.   From Domestic To Foreign Policy: Biden did not seek out foreign policy crises. His primary focus lay on domestic legislation and the midterms. His foreign policy intention was merely to solidify US alliances after quarrels under the Trump administration. However, looming gridlock is forcing him to focus more heavily on foreign policy, where presidential powers are greatest. In particular Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has pushed foreign policy to the center of the agenda. Once Biden’s approval ratings collapsed he began to take on greater foreign policy risks, as we noted in May. His foreign policy is reactive and defensive in the sense that he is responding to foreign aggression and trying to avoid any blowback that hurts his party in the midterms. But he can no longer be said to be risk-averse. Instead Biden is doubling down on the enlargement of NATO and military support for Ukraine. He is arming Taiwan and pledging an unequivocal US willingness to defend it in the event of an “unprecedented attack.” He has expanded high-tech export controls on China while maintaining President Trump’s tariffs. And he is threatening to respond “decisively” to Russia in the non-negligible chance that it deploys a tactical nuclear weapon against Ukraine. The US-Iran attempt to rejoin the 2015 nuclear deal is faltering, as we expected, due to mutual distrust. Almost immediately after negotiations failed in August, widespread social unrest broke out in Iran. While Iran’s structural conditions are conducive to social unrest, the Iranian government suspects the US of fomenting unrest, which is possible. Iran is threatening to retaliate. Iran will also continuing making nuclear advances prompting Israel to publicly entertain military options. The Biden administration will be forced to counteract Iranian threats against regional political stability and oil infrastructure. Hence Biden can no longer avoid energy supply risks emanating from the Middle East. The shift from domestic to foreign policy will become even more pronounced in 2023-24, as foreign policy will become more proactive due to gridlock at home. Taken together, gridlock will bring neutral fiscal policy and hawkish foreign policy. Any post-election decline in policy uncertainty will be short-lived. The loss of the House will increase the odds of economic policy mistakes in 2023 and a ruling party change in 2024 (Chart 11). A Republican House can impeach (but not remove) President Biden, put pressure on the Federal Reserve, and engage in brinksmanship over the national debt limit, which will need to be renewed in the third quarter of 2023. Obstructionism will put a floor under policy uncertainty, which will skyrocket as the 2024 election cycle approaches. Chart 11Biden’s 2024 Odds Fall If GOP Wins House Meanwhile proactive US foreign policy is not positive for investors as it risks escalating global instability. None of America’s rivals will be willing to offer major concessions to forge agreements with the Biden administration in 2023-24 because they will fear that President Trump or another populist Republican will retake the White House in 2025 and impose tariffs or sanctions regardless. The US cannot offer credible guarantees. This is how the Iran deal failed and it is likely to prevent a substantial US-China thaw in relations. Bottom Line: The investment takeaways from our key views for 2022 are mostly on track: inflation and policy uncertainty are rising, stocks are performing poorly, bond yields have spiked, and defensive sectors have outperformed cyclicals. These trends could start to shift in the fourth quarter given that domestic policy uncertainty will at least temporarily abate in the US and China after the fall’s political events. However, geopolitical energy shocks could still escalate if Russia or Iran disrupts global oil supply. And investors must plan for the worst. Even without additional energy shocks, Fed rate hikes are likely to precipitate a recession. Gridlock will have a neutral fiscal impact over the course of the subsequent 24 months, which is marginally disinflationary, but proactive US foreign policy will keep high the risk of energy shocks and global policy uncertainty. Checking Up On Our Strategic Themes For The 2020s It is useless to predict specific policy outcomes too far in the future but investors need a framework for understanding the general drift of national policy amid the dramatic macro shifts occurring today. Here is a short update to our strategic themes for the decade: 1.   Millennials/GenZ Rising: The death of the Silent Generation, the retirement of the Baby Boomers, and the rise of Generations X, Y, and Z are causing major shifts in the US economy and markets. First, US population growth is not great but better than its developed market peers. Immigration is robust, though it is likely to be restricted somewhat by future administrations (Chart 12). Relatively strong labor force growth implies higher potential growth than developed market peers, assuming US productivity meets or exceeds that of Europe, as it should (Chart 13). As long as this growth is accompanied by decent policy, i.e. not too inflationary, it will produce relatively attractive real returns for investors. Chart 12US Population Growth And Immigration Chart 13US Relative Labor Force And Potential Growth Second, however, inflation will be a recurring problem because population aging is driving a vast redistribution of wealth from older to younger and from generations with a high propensity to save to those with a high propensity to consume. The impact is inflationary since there will be fewer savings to fund investments, according to our Global Investment Strategist Peter Berezin. This trend will drive up equilibrium real interest rates and bond yields (Chart 14). Thus America will witness a tug of war in which a new inflation tendency engenders periodic policy backlashes to keep inflation in check, as is likely in the 2022 midterms. Chart 14Major Redistribution Of Wealth 2.   Peak Polarization: There is a large gap when it comes to identity and core values both within the Baby Boomer generation and between the Silent Generation and the younger generations. America has seen rapid change in the population’s ethnicity, religion, education, location, and industry. It is also a free country where self-expression is fully indulged, leading to wide extremes in individual and group behavior. Rapid pluralistic change combined with stark income and wealth inequality have fueled political polarization, which has made it increasingly difficult to generate nationwide policy consensus in recent decades (Chart 15). However, the rising electoral weight of the younger generations will resolve some of the most extreme policy differences in favor of the younger generations. Millennials and Generation Z will become more conservative over time but they will still lean to the left of their parents and grandparents on the economic policy spectrum (positive rights, progressive taxes, social spending, proactive regulation). Meaning that social spending and higher taxes will become more, not less, feasible over the long run (Chart 16). Meanwhile the revival of competition among the world’s great powers (multipolarity) is forcing the US population and policymakers to recognize common foreign challenges. This is leading to a new consensus around certain strategic and national interests having to do with trade protectionism, industrial guidance, and foreign policy realism. Chart 15Inequality As A Driver Of Polarization Chart 16Younger Generations Less ‘Capitalist,’ More ‘Socialist’ This new consensus can be seen in the passage of bipartisan bills to build infrastructure, promote US manufacturing, shift supply chains to US-allied countries, and impose punitive measures against Russia, China, and Iran (Chart 17). Chart 17New Consensus: Nation Building At Home 3.   Limited Big Government: The emerging policy consensus will be federalism but not authoritarianism – a larger but not overwhelming role for government in the economy. Popular opinion is demanding a larger role for the government to reduce domestic social grievances and political instability. It is also demanding greater protections from global trade. Elite opinion requires sustained high investment in national defense. All of this ostensibly points to a new era of Big Government but there are important caveats. The US constitution, private institutions, and popular opinion will continue to prevent the full adoption of a statist model, with its inefficient bureaucracy and excessive regulation. The cost of too much government has already appeared in this year’s surge of inflation, which is motivating a political backlash that will moderate the liberal spending trajectory. In short US governance is shifting from decentralization to centralization but it is a marginal not absolute change (Chart 18). The insurrection of 2021 failed but so did the cultural revolution of 2020. Chart 18New Consensus: Limited Big Government Demographics, politics, and economics all point to a new US policy paradigm in which new generations take over and form a new policy consensus – and yet that consensus is not truly socialist. It is rather a continuation of the American combination of federalism, liberalism, and nationalism. Civil war is likely to be avoided because the economy is stable enough and the political system is flexible enough to prevent the inevitable violent movements and domestic terrorism from causing state fragmentation. Bottom Line: US currency and equity markets have greatly outperformed the rest of the world as financial markets priced the US’s structural advantages in the unstable world after the 2008 financial crisis. This trend is intact for now but could suffer setbacks whenever global growth rebounds and the new US policy consensus leads to higher wages, higher taxes, and lower corporate profitability. Investment Takeaways In our annual forecast we noted that US midterm election years tend to produce a flat stock market, rising bond yields, and the outperformance of defensive sectors. This year has been even worse than normal with the S&P500 down 23% to date and the 10-year Treasury up 243 basis points to date (down 17% in terms of total return). Note, however, that stocks typically rise and bond yields typically fall in the year after the midterm, which may bring some relief in 2023 (Chart 19). We expect this bounce in 2023 but it cannot happen until inflation rolls over decisively. Chart 19Worse Than Average Market Performance In Midterm Election Year The dollar rally is in line with, but exceeding, the interest rate differential between US and European government bonds. This makes sense given the geopolitical risk premium. Dollar strength is not only about euro weakness but is broad-based, as becomes clear when looking at the trade-weighted dollar. We have long argued the dollar would rise in line with global policy uncertainty (Chart 20). While our long DXY trade is long in the tooth, momentum is strong. Defensive sectors will outperform in a strong dollar context. Cyclical sectors have more downside relative to defensives and small caps have more downside relative to large caps. But oil and gas equities have become defensive and have more upside relative to the broad market (Chart 21). Energy volatility will continue to be a driving macro force in the fourth quarter due to the crosswinds of geopolitical supply disruptions and global economic slowdown. We are re-initiating our recommendation to overweight oil and gas transportation and storage stocks relative to the S&P 500. Chart 20US Dollar Reaching Extremes, On Watch For Downgrade Chart 21Energy Volatility To Continue In Q4 Renewable energy stocks should also remain an overweight given the new political impetus behind energy security. Tech stocks have more downside in the near term but should bounce back once inflation rolls over and bond yields start to fall. Cyber-security companies will generally trade in line with tech but will also benefit from geopolitical tailwinds. Renewables, cyber-security, and aerospace/defense remain our key overweights (Chart 22), in addition to infrastructure stocks as mentioned earlier in the report. Given the sharp selloff in bonds, the disinflationary aspects of gridlock and eventual recession, and today’s extraordinary geopolitical risks, we recommending buying 10-year treasuries on a tactical basis. Chart 22Stick With Cyber Security, Defense, Renewables Over Long Run Matt Gertken Senior Vice President Chief US Political Strategy mattg@bcaresearch.com Jesse Anak Kuri Associate Editor Jesse.Kuri@bcaresearch.com Guy Russell Senior Analyst guyr@bcaresearch.com Yushu Ma Research Analyst yushu.ma@bcaresearch.com Alice Brocheux Research Associate alice.brocheux@bcaresearch.com Strategic View Open Tactical Positions (0-6 Months) Open Cyclical Recommendations (6-18 Months) Table A2Political Risk Matrix Table A3US Political Capital Index Chart A1Presidential Election Model Chart A2Senate Election Model  Table A4House Election Model Table A5APolitical Capital: White House And Congress Table A5BPolitical Capital: Household And Business Sentiment Table A5CPolitical Capital: The Economy And Markets      Footnotes  

Executive Summary Upward Repricing Of Bond Yields Continues In this report, we discuss our move last week to shift to a below-benchmark overall global duration stance in more detail. Our strongest conviction view on developed market government bonds is underweighting US Treasuries. The outcome of last week’s FOMC meeting, where the Fed committed to a rapid shift to restrictive US monetary policy, supports that position. Our strongest conviction overweight is on Japan, with the Bank of Japan both willing and able to maintain its cap on longer-term JGB yields. We are also overweight countries where it will be difficult for central banks to lift rates as much as markets expect – core Europe, Australia and Canada. The explosion in UK bond yields, and collapse of the British pound, seen after last week’s UK “mini-budget” shows that investors have not lost the power to punish fiscal and monetary policies that are non-credible - like a massive debt-financed tax cut at a time of high inflation. As a result, the Bank of England will now be forced to raise rates much more than we had been expecting, and Gilts will remain extremely volatile in the near-term. Bottom Line: Maintain a below-benchmark overall duration stance in global bond portfolios. Stay underweight US Treasuries. Upgrade exposure to government bonds in Japan and Canada to overweight, but tactically downgrade UK Gilts to underweight until a more market-friendly policy mix leads to greater stability of the British pound. Feature We shifted our recommended stance on overall global portfolio duration to below-benchmark in a Special Alert published last week. In this report, we go into the rationale for that move in more detail, and present specific details of that shift in terms of allocations by country across the various yield curves. Related Report  Global Fixed Income StrategyReduce Global Portfolio Duration To Below-Benchmark The global inflation and monetary policy backdrops remain toxic for bond markets. Last week saw interest rate increases from multiple developed economy central banks, including the Fed and Bank of England (BoE). The magnitudes of the rate hikes unnerved bond investors, with even the likes of perennial low yielders like the Swiss National Bank and Riksbank lifting rates by 75bps and 100bps, respectively. The Fed followed up its own 75bp hike by digging in its heels on the need for additional policy tightening after the 300bps of hikes already delivered this year (Chart 1). Fed Chair Jerome Powell strongly hinted that a policy-induced US recession is likely the only way to return overshooting US inflation back to the Fed’s 2% target. This triggered a breakout of the benchmark US 10-year Treasury yield above 3.5%. But the real fireworks in global bond markets occurred after the UK government announced its “mini-budget” last Friday that included massive tax cuts to be funded by debt issuance, triggering a sharp decline in the British Pound and spike in UK Gilt yields – a move that spilled over into other bond markets, pushing government bond yields to cyclical highs in the US and euro area. Chart 1Central Banks Keep Trying To “Out-Hawk” Each Other Chart 2Yields Are Now Driven By Rate Hike Expectations, Not Inflation We had been anticipating another move upward in global bond yields for this cycle, and we shifted to a below-benchmark overall global duration stance in advance of the Fed and BoE meetings last week. We see this next move higher in yields as being driven not by rising inflation expectations but by an upward repricing of interest rate expectations, leading to additional increases in real bond yields (Chart 2). Trying to pick a top in bond yields has now become a game of forecasting the level to which policy rates must rise in the current global monetary tightening cycle. On that front, there is still scope for rate expectations, and bond yields, to move higher in most developed market countries, justifying our downgrade of our recommended overall duration exposure to below-benchmark. Shifting rate expectations also lead to the changes in country bond allocations we announced last week. Rate Expectations And Country Bond Allocations Our proxy for medium-term nominal terminal rate expectations in developed market countries, the 5-year/5-year forward overnight index swap (OIS) rate, has been tracking 10-year bond yields very closely in the US and UK and, to a lesser extent, Europe (Chart 3). In those regions, the OIS curves are pricing in an increasing medium-term level of policy rates, leading to markets repricing government bond yields higher. In the US, the OIS curve is pricing in a 2023 peak for the fed funds rate of 4.67%, but with only a modest path of rate cuts in 2024 and 2025, leading to a 5-year/5-year OIS projection of 3.36% as of Monday’s market close. After the Gilt market rout, the UK OIS curve is now pricing in a 2023 peak Bank Rate over 6%, with our medium-term nominal rate proxy settling at 3.69%. In the euro area, the OIS curve is discounting a 2023 peak in the ECB policy rate of 3.22%, with a 5-year/5-year forward OIS rate of 2.7%. For all three of those regions, the market is now pricing in the highest peak in rates for the current tightening cycle. That is not the case in Canada or Australia, where rate expectations and longer-term bond yields are still below cyclical peaks (Chart 4). Japan remains the outlier, with the Bank of Japan’s yield curve control keeping 10-year JGB yields capped at 0.25%, even with the Japan OIS curve pricing in a medium-term terminal rate of 0.75%. Chart 3Rising Yields Reflect Higher Terminal Rate Expectations Chart 4Our High-Conviction Government Bond Overweights After looking at all the repricing of interest rate expectations and bond yields, we can determine our preferred government bond allocations within our strategic model bond portfolio framework. The US Remains Our Favorite Government Bond Underweight The new set of interest rate forecasts (“the dots”) presented at last week’s Fed meeting showed that the median FOMC member was forecasting the fed funds rate to rise to 4.4% by the end of 2022 and 4.6% by the end of 2023, before falling to 3.9% and 2.9% and the end of 2024 and 2025, respectively. Those are all significant increases from the June dots, where the expectations called for the funds rate to hit 3.4% by end-2022 and 3.8% by end-2023. The median Fed forecasts are now broadly in line with the pricing in the US OIS curve for 2022-2024, although the market expects higher rates than the FOMC in 2025 (Chart 5). Chart 5USTs Still Vulnerable To Additional Fed Hawkish Surprises There has been a lot of back and forth between the Fed and the markets this year, but the market has generally lagged the Fed interest rate projections for 2023 and 2024 before last week. Market pricing is now in line with the Fed dots, as investors have adjusted to the increasingly hawkish message from Fed officials that are focused solely on slowing growth, and tightening financial conditions, in an effort to bring US inflation down. We see the US Treasury curve as still vulnerable to additional hawkish messaging from the Fed, and a potentially higher-than-anticipated peak in the funds rate versus the FOMC dots. The US consumer is facing a lot of headwinds from higher interest rates and rising food and gasoline prices. However, the latter has fallen 26% from the June 13/2022 peak and is acting as a “tax cut” that also helps reduce US inflation expectations (Chart 6). Consumer confidence measures like the University of Michigan expectations survey have already shown improvement alongside the fall in gas prices, which has boosted real income expectations according to the New York Fed’s Consumer Survey (bottom panel). Even a subtle improvement in consumer confidence due to some easing of inflation expectations can help support a somewhat faster pace of consumer spending at a time of robust labor demand and accelerating wage growth. The Atlanta Fed Wage Tracker is now growing at a year-over-year pace of 5.7%, while the ratio of US job openings to unemployed workers remains near a record high (Chart 7). Fed Chair Powell has noted that the Fed must see significant weakening of the US jobs market for the Fed to consider pausing on its current rate hike path. So far, there is little evidence pointing to a loosening of US labor market conditions that would ease domestically-generated inflation pressures. Chart 6Lower Gas Prices Can Provide A Lift To US Consumer Spending Chart 7A Tight US Labor Market Will Keep The Fed Hawkish Chart 8Stay Underweight US Treasuries We expect overall US inflation to decelerate next year on the back of additional slowing of goods inflation, but will likely settle in the 3-4% range in 2023 given stubbornly sticky services inflation and wage growth. The Fed should follow through on its current interest rate projections, with a good chance that rates will need to be pushed up even higher in response to resilient labor market conditions in the first half of 2023. The risk/reward still favors higher US Treasury yields over at least the next 3-6 months, particularly with an improving flow of US data surprises and with bond investor duration positioning now much closer to neutral according to the JPMorgan client survey (Chart 8). Bottom Line: The US remains our highest conviction strategic government bond underweight in the developed markets. Recommended Allocations In Other Countries The path for monetary policy rates outside the US shows a similar profile as in the US, with a “front loading” of rate hikes to mid-2023 followed by modest rate cuts over the subsequent two years (Chart 9). The OIS-implied path for the level of rates is nearly identical in the US, Australia and Canada. On the other hand, markets are discounting much lower of levels of policy rates in Europe and Japan compared to the US, and a considerably higher path for rates in the UK (more on that in the next section). Chart 9Markets Priced For Global 'Front-Loaded' Rate Hikes We would lean against the US-like pricing of interest rates in Australia and Canada. Based on work we published in a recent Special Report along with our colleagues at BCA Research European Investment Strategy, the neutral real interest rate (“r-star”) is estimated to be deeply negative in Australia and Canada after adjusting for the high level of non-financial debt in those countries (Table 1). That financial fragility makes it much less likely that the Bank of Canada and Reserve Bank of Australia can raise rates as much as the Fed. Table 1Some Big Swings In Our R* Estimates When Including Debt US-like interest rates would almost certainly trigger a major downturn in house prices and household wealth given the inflated housing values in those two countries – the growth of which is already slowing rapidly in response to rate hikes delivered in 2022. We are maintaining our overweight recommendation on Australian government bonds, while we upgraded Canada to overweight from neutral after last week’s duration downgrade. Chart 10Move To Overweight Japan We are also staying overweight on German and French government bonds, as the ECB is unlikely to deliver the full extent of rate increases discounted in the European OIS curve. Our estimated debt-adjusted r-star is also quite negative in the euro area, suggesting that financial fragility issues (due to high government debt in Italy and high corporate debt in France) will likely limit the ECB’s ability to continue with recent chunky rate increases for much longer. In Japan, we continue to view JGBs as an “anti-duration” instrument, given the Bank of Japan’s persistence in maintaining negative interest rates and yield curve control. That makes JGBs a good overweight when global bond yields are rising and a good underweight when global bond yields are falling (Chart 10). Given our decision to reduce our recommended duration exposure to below-benchmark, the logical follow through decision is to upgrade JGBs to overweight. The only remaining country to consider is our view on UK Gilts, which has now become more complicated. Anarchy In The UK The selloff in the UK Gilt market has been stunning in its ferocity. Dating back to last Thursday’s 50bp rate hike by the BoE, the 10-year UK Gilt yield has jumped 120bps and now sits at 4.52%. The increase in yields was identical at the front-end of the Gilt curve, with the 2-year yield jumping 120bps to 4.68%.  The surge in longer-term Gilt yields stands out to the rise in bond yields seen outside the UK, as it also incorporates an increase in our estimate of the UK term premium – a move that was not matched in other countries (Chart 11). The rise in Gilt yields was also much more concentrated in real yields compared to inflation expectations (Chart 12), as markets aggressively repriced the path for UK policy rates after the UK government’s announced debt-financed fiscal package, including £45bn of tax cuts. Chart 11Upward Repricing Of Bond Yields Continues Chart 12The Gilt Market Becomes Unhinged The UK’s National Institute for Economic And Social Research (NIESR) estimates that the combined impact of the tax cuts and additional spending measures would increase the UK government deficit by a whopping £150bn, or 5% of GDP. The NIESR also estimated that the fiscal measures, including the previously-announced plan for the UK government to cap energy price increases, would result in positive UK GDP growth in the 4th quarter and also lift annual real GDP growth to 2% over 2023-24. The UK government now faces a major credibility issue with markets on its announced fiscal plans. The sheer size of the package, coming at a time when the US economy was already operating at full employment with high inflation, invites a greater than expected monetary policy tightening response from the BoE. The UK OIS curve now forecasts a peak in rates of 6.3% in October 2023, up from the current 2.25%. That would be a massive move in rates in just one year from a central bank that has been relatively gun shy in lifting rates since the 2008 financial crisis, even during the current inflation overshoot. New UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, and her new Chancellor of the Exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng, have both noted they would prefer a mix of looser fiscal policy (aimed at boosting the supply side of the economy to lift potential growth) with tighter monetary policy that would prevent asset bubbles and inflation overshoots. While there is certainly merit in any plan designed to boost medium-term growth by lifting anemic UK productivity through supply-side reforms, the timing of the announcement could not have been worse. Just one day earlier, the BoE announced a plan to go forward with the sale of Gilts from its balance sheet accumulated during quantitative easing. The Truss government needs to find buyers for all the Gilts that must be issued to pay for the tax cuts and stimulus, but the BoE will not be one of them. In the end, however, the BoE’s expected path for interest rates matters more than the increase in Gilt supply in determining the level of Gilt yields and the slope of the Gilt curve. The NIESR estimates that the UK public debt/GDP ratio will rise to 92% by 2024-25, versus its pre-budget forecast of 88%. While that is a meaningful increase, the correlation between the debt/GDP ratio and the slope of the Gilt curve has been negative for the past few years (Chart 13, top panel). The stronger relationship is between the slope of the curve and the level of the BoE base rate (bottom panel), which is pointing to an inversion of the 2-year/30-year curve if the BoE follows market pricing and lifts rates to 6%. Our view dating back to the early summer was that a low neutral interest rate would prevent the BoE from lifting rates as much as markets were discounting without causing a deep recession, lower inflation and, eventually, a quick reversal of rate hikes. The huge UK fiscal stimulus package changes that calculus, as the nominal neutral rate that will be needed to bring UK inflation back to target is likely now much higher. We have always believed that when a thesis underlying an investment recommendation is challenged by new information, it is best to adjust the recommendation to reflect the new facts. Thus, this week, we are tactically downgrading UK Gilts to underweight in our model bond portfolio framework. We still see a significant medium-term opportunity to go overweight Gilts, as UK policy rates pushing into the 4-6% range are not sustainable. However, the BoE will likely have no choice to begin lifting rates at a much more aggressive pace to restore UK policy credibility, especially with the British pound under immense selling pressure (Chart 14). Despite rumors of an inter-meeting rate hike by the BoE this week to try and support the pound, that is likely too risky a step for the BoE to take as it would invite a battle with investors and currency speculators. Such a battle would be difficult to win without a more credible and market-friendly medium-term fiscal policy from the Truss government. Chart 13The BoE Matters More Than Debt Levels For Gilts Chart 14Tactically Move To Underweight UK Gilts   Bottom Line: We will review our UK Gilt stance once there are more clear signals of stability in the pound, but for now, we will step aside and limit our recommended exposure to Gilts – even after the huge selloff seen to date, which likely has more to go. Summarizing All The Changes In Our Model Bond Portfolio All the changes to our recommended duration exposure and country allocations after the past week, including the new weightings in our model bond portfolio, are shown in the tables on pages 14-16. To summarize: We moved the overall recommended global duration exposure to below-benchmark, and shifted the model bond portfolio duration to 0.9 years below that of the custom benchmark index. We increased the size of the US Treasury underweight, and moved Canada and Japan to overweight. We moved the UK to underweight, on top of the reduction in UK duration exposure that was part of last week’s move to reduce overall portfolio duration. We are also cutting exposure to UK investment grade corporates to underweight, as part of an overall move to reduce UK risk in the portfolio. We slightly increased the overweight in Germany. In next week’s report, we will present the quarterly performance review of our model bond portfolio and, more importantly, we will present out scenario-based return expectations after all the changes made this week. Robert Robis, CFA Chief Fixed Income Strategist rrobis@bcaresearch.com     GFIS Model Bond Portfolio Recommended Positioning     Active Duration Contribution: GFIS Recommended Portfolio Vs. Custom Performance Benchmark The GFIS Recommended Portfolio Vs. The Custom Benchmark Index Global Fixed Income - Strategic Recommendations* Cyclical Recommendations (6-18 Months)