Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Geopolitics

We have long argued, on a case-by-case basis, that countries willing to play the superpowers against each other win in a multipolar world. The logic is intuitive, and in this report, we measure it systematically.

The US-Iran deal should hold in the near term, but its durability beyond the midterms looks doubtful. Our Geopolitical strategists see both sides as highly motivated to keep the deal alive for now. Even if there is another kinetic exchange or incident before…
Our US Political strategists argue that while the midterms matter, geopolitics is the main risk this year. Their quantitative model points to Republicans narrowly holding the Senate at 51-49, but our colleagues are skeptical and subjectively assign a 60%…
Our Geopolitical strategists believe the April 8 ceasefire remains broadly intact despite the latest Israel-Iran exchange and the absence of a formal US-Iran agreement. Both Washington and Tehran are using the current window to build negotiating leverage.…
Our clients see geopolitics as the dominant underpriced risk. In this week's poll, we asked what risk markets are most underpricing. A US-Iran ceasefire collapsing drew the largest share of BCA clients at 64%, while a Russia-NATO incident ranked second at…
US-Iran talks are again under strain after Monday’s exchange of fire and Israel’s attacks in Lebanon, but the escalation cycle still remains negotiations-driven and at least a short-term deal that restarts shipping this summer remains likely. Oil rose more…

The odds of a near-term US-Iran deal have gone up slightly, but the odds of a Russian provocation that divides NATO have also gone up. 

A 60-day ceasefire extension would buy the global economy some time, but it would not resolve the underlying supply problem. Oil prices and bond yields fell while equities rallied Tuesday morning after Trump announced…
Our GeoMacro strategists see Australia as the most geopolitically conflicted major economy in the world. Its security depends on the US, its export revenues on China, and its trade routes run through waters both powers contest. How that triple exposure…

In this month’s Beta Report, we assess what that structural tension means for investors under two distinct scenarios. In our base case – a multipolar world order – Australia's position turns out to be more advantageous than it appears. The great power capital expenditure race generates demand for precisely what Australia produces. In the tail risk – a hard bipolar rupture – the calculus inverts, and the same commodity dependencies that long appeared as structural strengths begin to look like structural liabilities.