Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Middle East

Every year we highlight five low-odds scenarios that would have a major impact on global financial markets if they happened. This year we contemplate a total reversal of Chinese policy, a US-Iran nuclear deal, a breakdown of NATO, US military action across the Americas, and an internationally coordinated FX intervention.

  • Congress will pass tax cuts by end of 2025 producing a fiscal thrust of about 0.9% of GDP in 2026. 
  • Trump will count on that stimulus as a basis for slapping tariffs on leading trade partners.
  • China will retaliate against Trump and stimulate its domestic economy, while pursuing stronger trade ties with other countries. Europe will also retaliate. 
  • Geopolitical risk will shift from Ukraine-Russia to Israel-Iran, where the conflict will continue to escalate until a crisis point is reached within 2025.   
After more than 10 years of civil war, Bashar Al-Assad’s rule came to an abrupt end when rebels captured Damascus. Syria might not be a significant country in economic or financial terms, but it is part of the Middle Eastern geopolitical balance.  …

The global political system is destabilizing and the US will turn more hawkish in foreign policy, trade policy, or both, regardless of the election outcome. Tactically go long the dollar.

In a trendless yet volatile year for oil, Israel’s retaliatory attack on Iran this weekend is a reminder the outlook is fraught with geopolitical risks. Risks are usually expressed as a geopolitical price premium, but this weekend’s events point to a…

We maintain 37% odds of a major recessionary oil shock, 51% odds of minor shocks, and 12% odds of no shocks.

Regular readers are familiar with our expectations for a global recession over the cyclical investment timeframe. A global downturn is overwhelmingly bearish for oil demand. The supply side, on the other hand, is simultaneously facing the threat of supply…

October seasonality tends to be negative for stocks in an election year. That is the only thing that has stayed our hand from shifting out of our tactical underweight on US equities, initiated – poorly – in July.
But the big macro news from September has not been bearish. The Fed has signaled jumbo cuts. Within seven weeks, the US central bank intends to cut by 100bps! Meanwhile, China appears to have reached a “policy bottom,” with its September 26 Politburo meeting signaling an extraordinary rhetorical shift towards fiscal policy. As such, we are starting to sniff out global reflation, akin to the 2015-2016 mid-cycle slowdown.
The labor market data still worries us. It is clearly deteriorating, on paper. Is it because of an imminent recession or “normalization?” It is difficult to say. We are open minded.
Finally, the Middle East tensions are again on the horizon. If Iran stays its hand against Saudi energy facilities – which we expect it to continue to do – the Iran-Israel conflict is a sideshow. Nonetheless, with global reflation afoot, we went long oil last week, on September 26. As such, geopolitics is a neat tailwind to that call.

According to BCA Research’s Geopolitical Strategy service, the Biden administration’s outreach to Iran will fail. The war in the Middle East has expanded as our colleagues predicted: Israel attacked Lebanon. Now Iran is likely to intervene, not because…

Markets are rallying on Fed rate cuts and China stimulus but there will also be October surprises ahead of the US election, which Trump could still win. Russia’s conflict with the West is escalating and the Middle East is destabilizing further. Investors should favor US bonds but they should add some risk in emerging markets in response to China’s policy turn.