Sectors

Similar to last Monday, the SPX opened weekly trading with gusto courtesy of the MRNA’s 94% efficacy vaccine news, but failed to breach previous all-time highs. In the short-term there are high odds that the SPX will move sideways, before rallying higher, in order to digest the recent up move and work off overbought conditions. According to the American Association of Individual investors (AAII), bulls are back in droves and the AAII bull/bear ratio has slingshot to the highest level since January 2018. This is cause for near-term concern as it has historically served as a reliable contrary signal (Chart 1). The knee-jerk equity market reaction on the back of the positive vaccine news has also pushed the percentage of SPX stocks trading above their 200-day moving average to a zenith, warning that the SPX will most likely move laterally (Chart 2). Chart 1 Stock Buying Reached Fever Pitch Stock Buying Reached Fever Pitch Chart 2 Stock Buying Reached Fever Pitch Stock Buying Reached Fever Pitch   Bottom Line: We remain cyclically and structurally bullish, but in the shorter-term, chances are that the SPX will take a breather. For more details, please refer to this Monday’s Weekly Report.

Highlights Portfolio Strategy The hardening insurance market on the back of firming demand for insurance services especially in residential real estate and automobile markets compel us to lift insurers to a benchmark allocation. A resurgent stock-to-bond ratio, the reopening of the economy and receding fiscal policy, election and COVID-19 uncertainties which will further suppress the equity risk premium, all boost the allure of the S&P asset management & custody bank index. Stay overweight.  Recent Changes Upgrade the S&P insurance index to neutral and lock in relative gains of 38%, today. This move also augments the S&P financials sector weighting to a modest overweight stance. Table 1 Inoculated Inoculated Feature News of a vaccine last Monday turbocharged equities to new intraday all-time highs, following up from a stellar performance the week of the election as odds of a “Blue Wave” collapsed. One of the implications is that the Trump corporate tax cuts will remain in place and investors breathed a sigh of relief (tax policy uncertainty shown inverted, Chart 1). While a smaller fiscal package owing to a split government postponed the rotation trade, the PFE vaccine efficacy news brought it back with a vengeance. This set up caused equities to discount all the good news in a heartbeat as typically happens when uncertainty is sky high and investors stampede into stocks. As we have argued here a VIX with a 40 handle was overdone and thus we crystalized our gains and closed our long VIX December futures trade prior to the election. We have been preparing our portfolio for such a looming rotation and this has been most evident in our long “Back To Work”/short “Covid-19 Winners” equity baskets. Last Monday they went in polar opposite directions and compelled us to put a trailing stop at the 10% return mark in order to protect profits (top three panels, Chart 2). Chart 1Tax Policy Uncertainty Relief Tax Policy Uncertainty Relief Tax Policy Uncertainty Relief Our recent preference of small caps at the expense of large caps that we first recommended a week before the election also depicts the ongoing equity market rotation out of overvalued tech stocks and into beaten down laggard cyclicals (bottom panel, Chart 2). Importantly, the economic reopening trade is still in the early innings, and we remain cyclically bullish on the prospects of the S&P 500 with a fresh end-2021 target of 4,000 that we updated last Monday in a Special Report before news of a vaccine hit the wires. Nevertheless, the recent parabolic rise in equities raises the obvious question: have stocks run too far too fast? Chart 2“Back To Work” Recovery “Back To Work” Recovery “Back To Work” Recovery First, there is no doubt that equities are overextended in the near-term as the collapse in the equity put/call (EPC) ratio highlights. Over the past year, the EPC ratio has formed a clearly defined range and a reading below 0.4 suggests overbought conditions (EPC ratio shown inverted, Chart 3). Second, while the violent rotation has pushed the SPX higher despite the deflating tech sector, we doubt that in the coming weeks the SPX will continue to gallop higher without the heavyweight tech sector partially participating in the rally. As a reminder, adding FANG (FB, AMZN, NFLX & GOOGL) weights to the GICS1 tech sector’s weighting results in a roughly 40% market cap weight of tech-related stocks in the S&P 500 (Chart 4). Chart 3No More Hedging No More Hedging No More Hedging Chart 4Tech Is 40% Of The Market   Tech Is 40% Of The Market Tech Is 40% Of The Market Third, according to the American Association of Individual investors (AAII), bulls are back in droves and the AAII bull/bear ratio has slingshot to the highest level since January 2018. This is cause for near-term concern as it has historically served as a reliable contrary signal (Chart 5). Fourth, the knee-jerk equity market reaction on the back of the positive vaccine news has also pushed the percentage of SPX stocks trading above their 200-day moving average to a zenith, warning that the SPX will most likely move laterally (Chart 6). Chart 5Bull Stampede Bull Stampede Bull Stampede Chart 6Too Far Too Fast? Too Far Too Fast? Too Far Too Fast? Finally, following a rough September and choppy October, seasonality is now in favor of owing stocks and given diminishing odds of year-end tax loss selling, equities should grind higher as 2020 draws to a close. Netting it all out, in the short-term our going assumption is that, barring exponential moves in the reopening trade similar to what we witnessed last week, the SPX will likely move sideways in order to digest the recent up move and work off overbought conditions. This is especially true if a selloff in the bond market continues to weigh on the tech sector’s still lofty valuation footprint. This week we make a sub-surface financials sector tweak that pushes this early cyclical sector to a modest above benchmark allocation. Time To Lock In Gains On Insurance The shifting macro landscape signals that it no longer pays to be bearish insurance stocks; thus we are upgrading the S&P insurance index to a neutral weighting today, crystalizing relative gains of 38% since inception. This cyclical underweight exposure in insurance stocks – as part of our barbell portfolio strategy within the financials universe – has cushioned the blow from our positive bank exposure and served its hedging purpose. Now that the election uncertainty is waning and given the recent positive PFE news on the effectiveness of their COVID-19 vaccine, insurance stocks will at least catch a bid. The economic reopening underscores that home and auto sales will continue to climb as nonfarm payrolls make a run for the pre-recession highs likely sometime in 2021. Keep in mind that consumers’ plans to buy a new car and a home are recovering smartly according to the most recent Conference Board survey (third panel, Chart 7). This upbeat demand backdrop for these key insurance end-markets should boost industry profits (bottom panel, Chart 7). Already a hardening insurance market (second panel, Chart 8) owing to pent-up residential real estate and automobile demand is a boon for underwriting results. Chart 7Insuring Gains Insuring Gains Insuring Gains Chart 8Hardening Market Hardening Market Hardening Market Importantly, the latest national account data corroborates firming final demand for insurance services: consumer outlays on insurance are galloping higher. The upshot is that the insurance valuation de-rating will transition to a rerating phase (bottom panel, Chart 8). Our Insurance Indicator does an excellent job in encapsulating all these moving parts and heralds rosier days ahead for relative share prices (second panel, Chart 9). However, there is a caveat that prevents us from swinging all the way to an overweight stance. Insurance CEOs have been anything but disciplined. Headcount is surging and industry wages are also accelerating. While executives may be preparing for a durable rebound in the coming months, a spiking wage bill will eat into insurance margins (third & bottom panels, Chart 9). Netting it all out, a hardening insurance market on the back of firming demand for insurance services especially in residential real estate and automobile markets compel us to lift insurers to a benchmark allocation. Bottom Line: Upgrade the S&P insurance index to neutral today, cementing relative profits of 38% since inception. This upgrade bumps the broad S&P financials sector to a modest overweight stance. The ticker symbols for the stocks in the S&P insurance index are: BLBG: S5INSU - AIG, CB, MET, MMC, PRU, TRV, AFL, AON, ALL, PGR, WLTW, HIG, PFG, L, CINF, LNC, AJG, UNM, AIZ, RE, GL, WRB. Chart 9One Positive And One Risk One Positive And One Risk One Positive And One Risk Stick With Asset Management & Custody Banks While we have moved to the sidelines on the S&P banks and S&P investment banks & brokers groups, we have maintained bank-related exposure via the S&P asset management & custody banks (AMCB) index and today we reiterate our overweight stance in this early cyclical group. Recent news of industry M&A activity has propped up stocks in this index. Any reduction of supply is great news not only because investors have fewer constituents available to deploy capital to, but also because of oligopolistic power with positive industry pricing power knock-on effects. Tack on the recent selloff in the bond market and factors are falling into place for a durable outperformance phase in the S&P AMCB index (top panel, Chart 10). In fact, the stock-to-bond ratio has caught on fire of late forecasting a pickup in momentum in relative share prices (middle panel, Chart 10). Fund flows are also emitting a bullish signal. Historically, increasing bond and equity fund flows have been positively correlated with the relative share price ratio and the current message is positive (bottom panel, Chart 10). Our view remains that the economy will continue to reopen in 2021 and news of the PFE vaccine reiterates our thesis. Thus, as economic uncertainty lifts, it should lead to multiple expansion in this beaten down early cyclical industry (middle panel, Chart 11). More broadly speaking, receding fiscal and election uncertainties should push down the still high equity risk premium and boost the allure of the S&P AMCB index (bottom panel, Chart 11). Chart 10Increasing Flows Are  A Boon Increasing Flows Are A Boon Increasing Flows Are A Boon Chart 11A Play On The Economic Reopening A Play On The Economic Reopening A Play On The Economic Reopening Securities lending is another source of income for the industry. Oscillating margin debt balances are an excellent demand gauge for such income producing services. Recently, margin debt has made a run for all-time highs in level terms, expanding at a near 20%/annum clip, underscoring that an earnings led advance is in the offing (bottom panel, Chart 12). With regard to earnings, there is broad-based skepticism on the industry’s profit growth recovery prospects both on a cyclical and structural time horizon. The middle panel of Chart 13 highlights that over the past two decades every time sell-side extreme pessimism reigned supreme, it was a good contrary signal. More precisely, when relative 12-month profit growth expectations sink to negative double digits, a reflex rebound typically ensues. We doubt this time will prove different. Chart 12Follow The Margin Debt Follow The Margin Debt Follow The Margin Debt In sum, a resurgent stock-to-bond ratio, the reopening of the economy and receding fiscal and election uncertainties which will further suppress the equity risk premium, all boost the allure of the S&P AMCB index. Chart 13Lean Against Extreme Analyst Pessimism Lean Against Extreme Analyst Pessimism Lean Against Extreme Analyst Pessimism Bottom Line: We continue to recommend an above benchmark allocation in the S&P AMCB index. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BLBG: S5AMGT – BK, BLK, STT, AMP, NTRS, TROW, BEN, IVZ.     Anastasios Avgeriou US Equity Strategist anastasios@bcaresearch.com   Current Recommendations Current Trades Strategic (10-Year) Trade Recommendations Drilling Deeper Into Earnings Drilling Deeper Into Earnings Size And Style Views October 26, 2020 Favor small over large caps July 27, 2020 Overweight cyclicals over defensives June 11, 2018 Long the BCA Millennial basket  The ticker symbols are: (AAPL, AMZN, UBER, HD, LEN, MSFT, NFLX, SPOT, TSLA, V). January 22, 2018 Favor value over growth

The market has rallied roughly 10% this month, and while we remain cyclically and structurally bullish, a short-term consolidation period is likely in the cards. As Chart 1 highlights below, extremely easy financial conditions along with a near halving in implied volatility – which have been key rally drivers since the March lows as we pointed out numerous times in our research – are nearly perfectly priced in the SPX. The implication is that if a meaningful rally is to resume, further easing is required.  Another factor underpinning the market’s recent advance is the drop in the CBOE’s implied correlation index (pair wise correlation of S&P500 constituents, shown inverted, Chart 2). However, correlations have collapsed and are near levels that have marked prior temporary peaks in the SPX. Bottom Line: A short-term consolidation phase is likely in the cards Consolidation Consolidation Consolidation Consolidation  

Small Caps Have The Upper Hand Small Caps Have The Upper Hand The vaccine announcement this week accelerated the unwinding of the long tech short everything else pandemic trade. While such a rotation is augmenting our portfolio via an explicit long “Back To Work”/short “COVID-19 Winners” trade, as we highlighted in yesterday’s Daily US Sector Insight, our small cap size bias is another prime beneficiary. Specifically, small caps outshined large caps by nearly 4% this week. One of the key drivers behind such a quick move is the delta in sector composition between the small and large cap indexes. The relative gap in deep cyclicals alone is 13% as we highlighted in recent research. The implication is that as manufacturing rebounds, so will the relative performance of small caps (top panel). Moreover, easy fiscal policy is a tonic to the small/large share price ratio. As a flood of money enters the economy with a slight lag, small caps will continue to make up ground lost during the early stages of the pandemic (fiscal balance shown inverted, bottom panel). Bottom Line: We reiterate our recent small cap bias.

Back To Work Trade Is On Fire Back To Work Trade Is On Fire Yesterday’s vaccine news reawakened investors to the reality that the world might be going back to normality much sooner than previously anticipated unleashing a violent equity rotation. Perhaps one of the most illustrative examples is the one-day percentage change in our “Back To Work” and “COVID-19 Winners” baskets. The top and middle panels of the chart on the right highlight the point: 7/14 stocks in the “Back To Work” basket experienced more than a 10% increase with AXP leading the pack with a mighty 21% rise. On the other side, pandemic beneficiaries got clobbered with ZM losing 17% of its value.  As a reminder, we have been recommending being long our “Back To Work” basket at the expense of the “COVID-19 Winners” basket since early September, and this trade is currently up 15% since inception. Importantly, the economic normalization process has just begun and according to the ISM manufacturing PMI new orders sub-category there is likely a long runway ahead for this pair trade (bottom panel). Bottom Line: Stick with the long “Back To Work” basket / short “COVID-19 Winners” basket, but recent market action is enticing us to put a trailing stop at the 10% return mark in order to protect profits. ​​​​​​​

In this Monday’s Special Report we introduced our 2021 SPX target of approximately 4,000 and also updated our EPS forecast from $162 to $168. We arrived at these targets by applying our three-scenario approach that we first implemented in our research methodology early in the year. Specifically, our worst-case scenario (with the lowest probability of occurrence) is a recessionary relapse (double-dip recession) in 2021. Our base- and best-case scenarios incorporate bullish recovery dynamics that we forecasted in our Special Report and that Table 1 below also summarizes. Bottom Line: We remain cyclically and structurally bullish on the US equity market with the current end-2021 SPX target of 4,000 and EPS of $168. Table 1 New 2021 EPS & SPX Targets New 2021 EPS & SPX Targets

Feature In April we first published our view that S&P 500 EPS would return to trend level of $162 in calendar 2021. At the time, it seemed unrealistic as heightened uncertainty was cloaking over 2020 let alone 2021. But fast-forward to today, and analysts have already eclipsed our stale $162 estimate according to I/B/E/S data. In this Special Report, we update our very well-received three SPX EPS scenario analysis that we highlighted in January, validate whether the $162 estimate is still reasonable, and finally introduce our 2021 SPX target. Importantly, our four-factor macro S&P 500 earnings model ticked up recently following a better-than-expected ISM manufacturing release. The profit model’s current projection calls for roughly 20% year-over-year (yoy) growth for the first quarter of 2021 (Chart 1). Understandably, such a bullish outlook might raise some eyebrows. However keep in mind that 20% yoy growth from a recessionary trough is by no means an overly bullish estimate as we have shown in recent research owing largely to base effects. The next step is to put some science behind our forecast and arrive at a robust and quantifiable EPS forecast. Thus, we deconstruct our SPX profit growth model into its components and trace their likely paths over the next 8 months. Our model has four inputs: ISM manufacturing PMI, the greenback, interest rates and house prices. The first three components are responsible for the lion’s share of explanatory power; hence this is where we focus most of our attention. Chart 1One-Way Road To 2021 One-Way Road To 2021 One-Way Road To 2021   Extending The Model: ISM Manufacturing PMI To plot the likely path of PMI data, we introduce US Equity Strategy's FutureCast Indicator, which is based on Michael Howell’s of CrossBoarder Capital D-star (duration*) measure.1 As a brief explanation, D-star measures duration at which curvature of the US Treasury curve is maximized. The interpretation of D-star is that it is a duration boundary after which, economic conditions become uncertain. Consequently, the further away that boundary is, the longer the sanguine macro environment is expected to last. Similarly, as D-star takes smaller values, it signifies that the boundary is getting closer to the present, meaning that the length of the sanguine macro window is contracting. For more details on the D-star measure, please refer to Michael Howell’s original publication.2 While our FutureCast indicator is a slightly modified version of the original D-star measure, it still preserves all of the properties including a lead on the ISM manufacturing PMI data by 15 months (Chart 2). The current message is also enticing: over the course of 2021 the ISM manufacturing PMI will stay perched in the mid-to-high 50s on a three-month moving average basis while dipping into the low-to-mid 50s in 2022. Chart 2Introducing FutureCast Indicator Introducing FutureCast Indicator Introducing FutureCast Indicator The next series that will help us gauge the ISM’s future path is the BCA US Liquidity Indicator (USLI), which is a blend of six variables including credit conditions and “excess money” calculations that quantify how much extra money is available to the financial economy after the real economy takes its share adjusted for inflation. Similar to our FutureCast Indicator, the USLI used to lead the PMI by approximately 18 months prior to the dot-com bubble, but since then the lead has changed to 30 months (Chart 3). This extension likely reflects the growing dependence of the US economy on the financial sector. Chart 3Everyone Gets Liquidity! Everyone Gets Liquidity! Everyone Gets Liquidity! We have entered a brand-new liquidity cycle as the USLI is printing nearly all-time high readings. The reason behind such an aggressive rise is a number of exogenous shocks that were hounding the market over the past several years. Not only was liquidity already contracting in 2018, but the trade war with China exacerbated the manufacturing downturn capping new inflows. As a result, by the time the virus hit, US liquidity canisters were running dry, and policy makers had to open the liquidity spigots in order to belatedly cushion the blow from the trade war and combat this year’s COVID-19 related lockdown. The net result is that today abundant liquidity is sustaining the budding recovery, which will be reflected in upbeat PMI prints going forward. Extending The Model: The US Dollar The US dollar is the second major input in our earnings model as the S&P 500 derives 43% of its sales outside US boarders. Table 1 also highlights that deep cyclical sectors source most of their revenues internationally, further underscoring greenback’s importance. Currently, the US dollar remains range bound likely taking a breather before resuming its downtrend as ours and BCA’s working view remains for a cyclical depreciation in the currency. The bearish USD thesis is multifaceted. Starting from a structural (5-10 years) time horizon, swelling twin deficits as far as the eye can see emit a bearish US dollar signal; in more detail, prior to the pandemic, the US twin deficits were estimated to gradually rise toward the 7.5% mark, but COVID-19 related fiscal largess has pushed the twin deficits into the stratosphere (top panel, Chart 4). Table 1S&P 500 GICS1 Foreign Sales As A Percent Of Total Sales* Deconstructing Earnings Deconstructing Earnings Switching gears from a structural to a medium-term horizon (2-3 years), BCA’s four-factor macro model, is also sending an unambiguous bearish message for the greenback (middle panel, Chart 4). Finally, on a short-term time frame, the USD is lagging the money multiplier by approximately 3 months, and the nosedive in the latter cements the US dollar bearish thesis (bottom panel, Chart 4). Chart 4Bearish Across All Timeframes Bearish Across All Timeframes Bearish Across All Timeframes Since S&P 500 sales and the greenback are inversely correlated, and as the dollar bearish view unfolds, it will serve as a tonic to top- and bottom-line growth. Extending The Model: US 10-Year Treasury Yield Now onto the final piece of the puzzle – the 10-year US Treasury yield. Up until recently, the bond market was dormant refusing to price in the recovery. While the selloff in bonds that commenced in early August took a breather on the back of the GOP retaining the Senate, i.e. implying a smaller than previously expected fiscal stimulus package, the path of least resistance remains higher for yields. As the economy continues to reopen in 2021, a new bear market in bonds is likely. US yields are tightly correlated with the ebbs and flows of global growth, especially G7 industrial production (IP) growth. Global IP is set to recover from the depths of the COVID-19 recession paving the way for higher 10-year US Treasury yields. In fact, our excess demand for goods indicator, which gauges the difference between the total number of goods produced versus consumed, leads industrial production data by 12 months and currently predicts a long overdue V-shaped recovery in global IP (Chart 5). In summary, it is only a question of time until the ten-year catches up with “soft” data and the bullish economic signal from the equity market, both of which have already discounted a V-shaped recovery. The US 10-year Treasury yield has a positive coefficient in our SPX EPS growth regression model, implying that rising yields that reflect an economic rebound boost EPS and vice versa. Chart 5Yields Will Rise Yields Will Rise Yields Will Rise Tying It All Together Adding all the pieces of the puzzle reveals that our previous $162 estimate is slightly pessimistic for calendar 2021. We arrived to this conclusion by applying our three-scenario approach that we first implemented in our research methodology early in the year. Specifically, our worst-case scenario (with the lowest probability of occurrence) is a recessionary relapse (double-dip recession) in 2021. Our base- and best-case scenarios incorporate bullish dynamics that we outlined earlier in the report and we quantify below to arrive at our new probability-weighted $168 EPS estimate. We then deduce our 2021 SPX target through a five-step process outlined in Table 2. Table 2Three Scenarios Deconstructing Earnings Deconstructing Earnings Step 1: We plug into the model our base, worse and best case estimates of the four macro variables into mid-2021, and we get as output the model’s estimate of EPS growth for end-2021 with a range of -3.6% to 36.2% (one important assumption is that the historical correlation of the movement of these variables holds steady). Step 2: Then, we apply these growth rates to the expected IBES 2020 EPS forecast of $136/share and arrive at our end-2021 three scenarios EPS level estimates with a range of $131/share to $185/share. Step 3: We then assign probabilities to those three outcomes resulting in our new 2021 EPS forecast of $168/share. Step 4: In order to get an SPX expected value we need to apply a forward P/E multiple to our EPS estimate. Thus, we introduce our base-, worse- and best- case forward P/Es and multiply them with our $168/share weighted EPS forecast in order to arrive at the SPX 3,940 expected value for end-2021. Concluding Thoughts So what does it all mean? At the onset of the report we mentioned an eyebrow-raising 20% EPS growth estimate. However as it turns out, if we take into account the long overdue economic recovery that started in early-2020, but got short-circuited due to the COVID-19 outbreak, there are reasonable scenarios that can overwhelm our previous $162 2021 EPS target. Moreover, if the looming stimulus lands sometime in early Q1/2021, our best-case scenario may come to fruition. Under such a backdrop the SPX is likely to gallop even higher than our roughly SPX 4,000 target by the end of 2021. Finally, last week Wall Street analysts upgraded their calendar 2021 EPS estimate to $168 following news that the GOP would retain the Senate, which will prevent Biden’s tax increase should he be the winner of the 2020 election. If everything goes according to plan, then there are high odds that sell-side analysts will eventually catch up to our best-case scenario. But by then the market will have likely already discounted such a rosy backdrop, calling for a brand-new earnings analysis. Stay tuned.   Arseniy Urazov Research Associate Arseniyu@bcaresearch.com     Footnotes 1     Howell, Michael J. 2017. Further Investigations into the Term Structure of Interest Rates. London: University of London. 2     Ibid.

Highlights According to betting markets, Joe Biden is likely to become the 46th US president, with the Republicans maintaining control of the Senate. Such a balance of power could produce less fiscal stimulus than any of the other possible outcomes that were in play on Tuesday. Nevertheless, public opinion still favors a more expansionary fiscal policy. There is also an outside chance that Republicans in the Senate and Democrats in the House could craft a “grand bargain” that raises spending while making Trump’s corporate tax cuts permanent. The combination of continued easy monetary policy, modestly looser fiscal policy, and progress on a vaccine should be enough to keep global growth on an above-trend path next year. Bank shares have been the big losers since the election, but should start to outperform as yield curves re-steepen, worries about soaring bad loans subside, and lending growth outpaces bleak expectations. Investors should remain overweight global equities versus bonds. Be prepared to increase exposure to value stocks when clearer evidence emerges that the latest wave of the pandemic is cresting. Another Election Rollercoaster Last week, we highlighted that BCA’s geopolitical quant model was predicting a much closer election than most pundits were expecting. This indeed turned out to be the case. For a brief while on Tuesday night, betting markets were giving Donald Trump a greater than 75% chance of being re-elected. Unfortunately for the president, the good news did not last long. As more mail-in ballots and ballots cast in large urban areas were counted, the needle began to swing towards Joe Biden. At the time of writing, betting markets are giving Biden an 88% chance of becoming President. Trump still has a chance of winning, but assuming he loses Nevada, Michigan, and Wisconsin, he would need to win Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Georgia. That is a tall order. According to PredictIt, the latter three states are all leaning towards Biden (Chart 1). Chart 1The Distribution Of Electoral College Votes According To Betting Markets Election Fireworks Election Fireworks More positively for the GOP, the Republicans gained a net six seats in the House of Representatives, and held onto the Senate thanks to surprise victories for their candidates in Maine and North Carolina. That said, the Senate could still revert to Democratic hands depending on the final vote tally in Georgia, North Carolina, and Alaska; PredictIt assigns a 22% probability to the Democrats taking the Senate. Moreover, even if they fall short this time around, the Democrats still have a chance of winning a 50-seat de facto majority in the Senate if both Georgia races go to a run-off election on January 5. Stimulus In Peril? Assuming that Republicans maintain their majority in the Senate, tax hikes will remain off the table. This is good for stocks. Joe Biden would also lower the temperature on trade tensions with China. This, too, is good for stocks. Conversely, the odds of a major fiscal stimulus package have dropped. Donald Trump is not averse to big spending programs. In contrast, the Republicans in the Senate have rejected calls for a large stimulus bill. With Joe Biden as President, Republican senators would have even less incentive to give the Democrats what they want. Nevertheless, there are three reasons to think that Republicans will agree on a new stimulus bill. First, the economy needs it. While US growth should remain reasonably firm in the fourth quarter, this is only because households were able to build up some savings earlier this year which they can now draw on. As Chart 2 shows, since April, labor earnings have only grown one-third as much as personal spending. Transfer income has also plunged, resulting in a renewed drop in savings. Once households run out of accumulated savings, there is a risk that they will cut back on spending. Second, government borrowing rates remain extremely low by historic standards. Real rates are negative across the entire yield curve (Chart 3). Chart 2Savings Have Dropped Since April As Transfers Declined Election Fireworks Election Fireworks Chart 3Real Rates Are Negative Across The Entire Yield Curve Election Fireworks Election Fireworks   Third, and perhaps most politically salient, public opinion favors more expansionary fiscal policy. About 72% of voters support a hypothetical $2 trillion stimulus package that extends emergency unemployment insurance benefits, distributes direct cash payments to households, and provides financial support to state and local governments (Table 1). Such a package is basically what the Democrats are proposing. It is noteworthy that when this package is described in non-partisan terms, even the majority of Republicans are in favor of it. Table 1Strong Support For Stimulus Election Fireworks Election Fireworks All this suggests that Republicans will accede to a medium-sized stimulus bill in the neighbourhood of $700 billion-to-$1 trillion in order to avoid being perceived as stingy and obstructionist. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell noted on Wednesday that getting a deal done was “job one.” While not our base case, a significantly larger bill is also possible. Most Republicans are not opposed to bigger budget deficits per se. It is increased social spending that they do not like. Budget deficits in the service of tax cuts are perfectly acceptable to the majority of Republicans. This raises the possibility that Republicans in the Senate and Democrats in the House could strike a grand bargain that raises spending while also promising additional tax relief. Most of Trump’s corporate tax cuts expire in 2025. A sizeable stimulus bill that makes these tax cuts permanent while increasing long-term spending on infrastructure, health care, education, and other Democratic priorities could still emerge from a divided Congress.   Wall Street Versus Main Street If one needed any more proof that what is good for Wall Street is not necessarily good for Main Street, the last three trading days provided it. The S&P 500 is up 6% since Monday’s close, spurred on by the reassurance that corporate taxes will not rise. In contrast, the 10-year bond yield has fallen 8 basis points on diminished prospects for a big stimulus package. The drop in bond yields since the election has raised the present value of corporate cash flows, leading to higher equity valuations. Growth companies have benefited disproportionately from falling bond yields. In contrast to value companies, investors expect growth companies to generate the bulk of their earnings far in the future. This makes their valuations highly sensitive to changes in discount rates. It is not surprising that tech shares – the FAANGs in particular – soared following the election (Chart 4). Chart 4Growth Equities Benefited Disproportionately From A Post-Election Drop In Yields Election Fireworks Election Fireworks A Bottom For The Big Banks? Bank shares tend to be overrepresented in value indices. Unlike tech, banks normally lose out when bond yields fall. As Chart 5 shows, net interest margins have collapsed for banks this year as bond yields have cratered. The drop in yields since the election has further punished bank shares. Chart 5Bank Net Interest Margins Have Collapsed As Bond Yields Have Cratered This Year Election Fireworks Election Fireworks Chart 6Commercial Bankruptcy Filings Remain In Check Election Fireworks Election Fireworks Yet, as our earlier discussion suggests, bond yields could rise again if the US Congress delivers more stimulus than currently expected. This would help banks, while potentially taking some of the wind from the sails of tech stocks. The combination of further fiscal easing and a vaccine next year could help banks in another way. If the global economy bounces back, banks would suffer fewer loan defaults. The biggest US banks have set aside more than $60 billion to cover potential loan losses. They have done so even though commercial bankruptcies have declined so far this year (Chart 6). A stronger economy would allow banks to release some of those provisions back into earnings.   Bank Regulation Is Not A Major Worry Anymore Wouldn’t the potential benefits to banks from more fiscal support and higher bond yields be outweighed by a greater regulatory burden under a Biden administration? Probably not. For one thing, a Republican Senate could block legislation that expanded regulation. Moreover, Biden hails from Delaware, a state that derives more than a quarter of its GDP from the finance and insurance sectors. He was only one of two Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee to vote in favor of the 2005 bankruptcy bill that made it more difficult for households to discharge their debts. It should also be stressed that most of the regulatory reforms that the Democrats sought after the financial crisis have already been encoded in the Dodd-Frank Act. The Act was passed during the Obama administration. While the Trump administration did water down some of its provisions, the changes were modest and had bipartisan support. Big Banks Are More Resilient Than Small Ones Today, US banks are better capitalized than they were in the years leading up to the financial crisis (Chart 7). The largest banks – the so-called Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs) – are required to hold an additional capital buffer, which arguably makes them even safer. Unlike the smaller regional banks, the SIFIs have only modest exposure to the troubled commercial real estate sector. As my colleague Jonathan LaBerge has documented, big banks have only 6% of their assets tied up in commercial real estate compared to 25% for smaller banks (Table 2). Chart 7US Banks: Better Capitalized Today Than Right Before The Financial Crisis US Banks: Better Capitalized Today Than Right Before The Financial Crisis US Banks: Better Capitalized Today Than Right Before The Financial Crisis Table 2Most US Commercial Real Estate Loans Are Held By Small Banks Election Fireworks Election Fireworks The largest US banks have more exposure to residential real estate than to commercial real estate. The US housing market has been firing on all cylinders recently. Single-family housing starts were up 24% year-over-year in September. Building permits and home sales are near cycle highs. The S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index rose 5.2% in August, up from 4.1% in July. The FHFA index surged 8.1% in August over the prior year. Homebuilder confidence hit a new record in October (Chart 8). Homebuilder stocks are up more than 20% versus the broad market this year. Chart 8US Housing Market: Firing On All Cylinders US Housing Market: Firing On All Cylinders US Housing Market: Firing On All Cylinders According to TransUnion, consumer delinquencies have been trending lower across most loan categories (Table 3). Notably, the 60-day delinquency rate on residential mortgages stood at 1% in September, down from 1.5% the same month last year. Table 3A Snapshot Of Consumer Delinquencies Election Fireworks Election Fireworks The Forbearance Time Bomb? Some investors have expressed concern that various pandemic-related forbearance programs are distorting the delinquency data. Reassuringly, that does not appear to be the case. Summarizing the results from the latest round of earnings calls with top bank executives, BCA’s Chief US Investment Strategist Doug Peta wrote: “Last week’s calls assuaged our concerns … It now appears that consumer requests for forbearance at the outset of the COVID-19 outbreak were analogous to businesses’ credit line draws: exercises of emergency options that turned out not to be necessary, and are on their way to being unwound with little ado.”1 Banks Are Cheap From a valuation perspective, relative to the broad market, US banks trade at one of the largest discounts on record on both a price-to-book and price-to-earnings basis (Chart 9). Earnings estimates are also starting to move in the banks’ favor. Relative 12-month forward earnings estimates for US banks are trending higher even against the tech sector (Chart 10). This largely reflects the expectation that bank earnings will grow more quickly than other sectors in 2021/22. Chart 9Bank Stocks Are Cheap Bank Stocks Are Cheap Bank Stocks Are Cheap Chart 10Bank Earnings Estimates Are Catching Up Bank Earnings Estimates Are Catching Up Bank Earnings Estimates Are Catching Up   A Few Words About Global Banks Chart 11Euro Area Banks Have Fared Especially Badly Since The GFC Euro Area Banks Have Fared Especially Badly Since The GFC Euro Area Banks Have Fared Especially Badly Since The GFC Chart 12Banks: A Low Bar For Success Election Fireworks Election Fireworks Banks in a number of markets outside the US face greater structural challenges than their US counterparts. Most notably, euro area bank earnings remain well below their pre-GFC highs (Chart 11). That said, investors are not exactly expecting European bank profits to recover to their glory days anytime soon. Chart 12 shows that if euro area bank EPS were to simply go back to last year’s levels, banks would trade at 5.4-times earnings. This implies a very low bar for success. Investment Conclusions Stocks have run up a lot over the past few days on fairly weak breadth. A short-term pullback would not be surprising. Nevertheless, investors should remain overweight global equities versus bonds over a 12-month horizon. The combination of ongoing fiscal and monetary support, together with a vaccine, will buoy global growth. As Chart 13 shows, it’s rare for stocks to underperform bonds when the global economy is strengthening. Chart 13Stocks Rarely Underperform Bonds When The Global Economy Is Strengthening Stocks Rarely Underperform Bonds When The Global Economy Is Strengthening Stocks Rarely Underperform Bonds When The Global Economy Is Strengthening Chart 14Value Stocks Typically Do Well When Economic Activity Is Picking Up Value Stocks Typically Do Well When Economic Activity Is Picking Up Value Stocks Typically Do Well When Economic Activity Is Picking Up   Value stocks typically do well when economic activity is picking up (Chart 14). That said, we are less sure about when the inflection point in the value/growth trade will arrive. As we have noted before, the “pandemic trade” benefits growth stocks, while the “reopening trade” benefits value stocks. For now, the number of new infections has not shown signs of peaking in either the US or Europe (Chart 15). Investors should continue monitoring the daily Covid data and be prepared to increase exposure to value stocks when clearer evidence emerges that the latest wave of the pandemic is cresting.   Chart 15The Number Of New Cases Continues To Rise Globally... But Mortality Rates Are Lower Than Earlier This Year Election Fireworks Election Fireworks Chart 16The Dollar Is A Countercyclical Currency The Dollar Is A Countercyclical Currency The Dollar Is A Countercyclical Currency As a countercyclical currency, the dollar should weaken next year as policy remains accommodative and pandemic risks recede (Chart 16). EM Asian currencies are especially appealing. A hiatus in the trade war should allow the Chinese yuan to strengthen even further. This will drag other regional currencies higher. Peter Berezin Chief Global Strategist peterb@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1  Please see US Investment Strategy Weekly Report, “The Big Bank Beige Book, October 2020,” dated October 19, 2020. Global Investment Strategy View Matrix Election Fireworks Election Fireworks Current MacroQuant Model Scores Election Fireworks Election Fireworks

The global semiconductor industry has been experiencing a record amount of IPOs and M&A deals in recent months. A flurry of IPOs and M&As in any industry often serves as a sign of a top in share prices (Chart 1). Chat 1Will Booming Semiconductor IPOs And M&As Mark A Peak In Share Prices? Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan The basis is that IPO and M&A booms usually occur when investor sentiment on that industry is super optimistic, which often coincides with a top in share prices. Does this mean that semiconductor stocks in general, and the ones in Taiwan and Korea in particular, are at their zenith? Our broad judgement is that semi stocks have not reached a secular peak. First, as we argued in a recent Special Report, the semiconductor industry is in a structural uptrend due to the continuing rollout of 5G networks and phones, a wider adoption of data centers, further technological advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, edge computing and smaller nodes for chip manufacturing. Second, it is critical to differentiate a macro call on semiconductors from a bottom-up call on individual stocks. Not all semi companies have rallied in recent years, i.e., there has been great divergence among global semi stocks as shown in Chart 2. Chat 2The Performance Of Semiconductor Stocks Has Varied Greatly Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Several semiconductor companies – like TSMC, Nvidia and AMD – have achieved technological breakthroughs, putting them in a position to enjoy high order volumes and charge higher prices. Not surprisingly, revenues of these companies have outpaced the industry average by a wide margin (Chart 3). Chat 3Semiconductor Companies' Revenues Have Diverged Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Others – like Intel and Analog Devices - have posted inferior revenue gains because they have fallen behind technologically or because they are specializing in certain types of semiconductors for which demand and pricing have been lackluster. Chat 4One-Off Surge In Demand For Semis Might Be Over Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Finally, if the global reflation trade resumes and global stocks continue advancing, as the first post-US election day suggests, there is little reason for global semiconductor stocks to falter at this moment. From the macro perspective, lower interest rates in the long run will support not-so-cheap semiconductor stock valuations. In addition, companies with access to unique technological capabilities will be able to raise their product prices benefiting their profits.    That said, there are also several signs that the global semi demand cycle might have entered a period of indigestion: The one-off demand surge for personal computers and gadgets and one-off ramp up of global server shipments due to the pandemic might be drawing to a close (Chart 4, top panel). Digitimes Research has reported that global server shipments are estimated to have slipped 6% sequentially in Q3 from Q2 and are projected to drop another 12% in Q4 (Chart 4, bottom panel). Unlike those in March-April, renewed lockdowns are unlikely to produce another surge in demand for digital equipment and, hence, for semis. Many people and companies have already settled into working from home. In short, as the effect of the one-off demand surge for digital hardware fades, global semi demand will moderate.  Semiconductor companies in general, and the ones in Korea and Taiwan in particular, have greatly benefited from China having stockpiled semiconductors in 2019 and 2020 in preparation for US sanctions on Huawei that went into effect on September 15, 2020 (Chart 5). The US supply ban on semiconductors to China for 5G technology will remain in place regardless of the outcome of the US presidential elections. Restrictions on semi sales to China will weigh on certain semi producers. In addition, smartphone sales in China generally, including 5G smartphone sales, have plunged as of late (Chart 6). Chat 5China Has Been Accumulating Semis Inventories Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Chat 6China: Smartphone Shipments, Including 5G, Are Weak Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan   Finally, the PMI new orders sub-index for Taiwan’s electronic industry has rolled over, signaling a slowdown in its growth rate (Chart 7).   Similarly, the memory chip revenue indicator has recently rolled over, signaling a potential risk to memory stocks such as Samsung and Hynix which make up the Korean technology index (Chart 8). Chat 7A Moderation In The Taiwanese Semis Industry? Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Chat 8Proxy for Value Of Memory Chips And Korean Tech Stocks Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan Asian Semi Stocks: Upgrade Korea But Not Taiwan   We have been advocating a neutral allocation to both the Korean and Taiwanese stock markets within the EM equity universe. One of our arguments for this strategy has been a potential escalation in the US-China confrontation going into the US elections. However, this risk has not materialized. We are upgrading the Korean bourse to overweight. As to Taiwan, a contested US election and the resulting vacuum of power in the next couple of months might lead to a rise in all types of geopolitical risks around the world. Taiwan could be one of these. We maintain a neutral allocation to the Taiwanese bourse within an EM equity portfolio. Bottom Line: In absolute terms, Korean and Taiwanese equity performance depends on the direction of global stocks. We will discuss the outlook for global and EM stocks in a Strategy Report to be published early next week when there is more clarity on the outcome of the US presidential elections. Within an EM equity universe, we are upgrading Korean stocks from neutral to overweight but keeping Taiwan’s allocation at neutral. Arthur Budaghyan Chief Emerging Markets Strategist arthur@bcaresearch.com Ellen JingYuan He Associate Vice President ellenj@bcaresearch.com Footnotes

Dear client, Instead of our regular Daily Sector Insight, tomorrow we will be sending you our sister’s Geopolitical Strategy service Weekly Report with a post mortem on the US election. On Monday our regular service resumes with a Special Report on SPX earnings penned by my colleague Arseniy Urazov. Kind Regards, Anastasios Stick With Cyclicals vs. Defensives Stick With Cyclicals vs. Defensives Today we reiterate our cyclicals over defensives portfolio bent that we instituted in late July. Not only is the slingshot recovery in the ISM manufacturing survey underpinning cyclicals at the expense of defensives (top panel), but also relative debt dynamics will further cement cyclicals’ reign over their defensive peers. The deep cyclicals (tech, industrials, materials and energy) net debt-to-EBITDA ratio has stabilized near 1.5x during the recession on the back of cash flow ails (second panel). In fact, cyclicals have been paying down net debt in absolute terms during the pandemic. In marked contrast, the defensives (health care, consumer staples, utilities and telecom services) net debt-to-EBITDA ratio is hovering near 3x, as these debt saddled sectors have not been able to pay down net debt. Not only is net debt roughly $2tn (bottom panel), but it also comprises 50% of the broad market’s net debt at a time when their market cap weight is close to 30%. Taken together, the relative debt profile clearly favors cyclicals at the expense of defensives. Bottom Line: We continue to recommend a cyclicals versus defensives portfolio bent. For more details, please refer to this Monday’s Weekly Report.