Executive Summary For the first time in a decade, it is much less attractive to buy than to rent a home. In both the UK and US, the mortgage rate is now almost double the average rental yield. To reset the equilibrium between buying and renting a home, either mortgage rates must come down by around 150 bps, or house prices must suffer a large double-digit correction. Or some combination, such as mortgage rates down 100 bps and house prices down 10 percent. In the US, a 10-year upcycle in housing investment has resulted in overinvestment relative to the number of households. Falling house prices coming hot on the heels of a combined stock and bond market crash will unleash a deflationary impulse in 2023, which will return economies to 2 percent inflation. This reiterates our ‘2022-23 = 1981-82’ template for the markets. A coordinated global recession will cause bond prices to enter a sustained rally in 2023, in which the 30-year T-bond yield will fall to sub-2.5 percent. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 will test 3500, or even 3200, before a strong rally will lift it through 5000 later in 2023. It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A UK Home!
It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A UK Home!
It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A UK Home!
Bottom Line: Falling house prices coming hot on the heels of a combined stock and bond market crash will unleash a deflationary impulse in 2023, which will return economies to 2 percent inflation. Feature Mortgage rates around the world have skyrocketed. The UK 5-year fixed mortgage rate which started the year at under 2 percent has more than doubled to over 5 percent. And the US 30-year mortgage rate, which began the year at 3 percent, now stands at an eyewatering 7 percent, its highest level since the US housing bubble burst in 2008. This raises a worrying spectre. Is the recent surge in mortgage rates about to trigger another housing crash? (Chart I-1 and Chart I-2). Chart I-1UK Mortgage Rate Has Doubled
UK Mortgage Rate Has Doubled
UK Mortgage Rate Has Doubled
Chart I-2US Mortgage Rate Has Doubled
US Mortgage Rate Has Doubled
US Mortgage Rate Has Doubled
A good way to answer the question is to compare the cashflow costs of buying versus renting a home. This is because home prices are set by the volume of homebuyers versus home-sellers. If would-be homebuyers decide to rent rather than to buy – because renting gets them ‘more house’ – then it will drag down home prices. Here’s the concern. For the first time in a decade, it is much less attractive to buy than to rent a home. In both the UK and US, the mortgage rate is now almost double the average rental yield. Put another way, whatever your monthly housing budget, you can now rent a home worth twice as much as you can buy (Chart I-3 and Chart I-4). Chart I-3It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A UK Home!
It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A UK Home!
It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A UK Home!
Chart I-4It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A US Home!
It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A US Home!
It Now Costs Twice As Much To Buy Than To Rent A US Home!
The Universal Theory Of House Prices Buying and renting a home are not the same thing, so the head-to-head comparison between the mortgage rate and rental yield is a simplification. Buying and renting are similar in that they both provide you with somewhere to live, a roof over your head or, in economic jargon, the consumption service called ‘shelter’. But there are two big differences. First, unlike renting, buying a home also provides you with an investment whose value you expect to increase in the long run. Second, unlike renting, buying a home incurs you the costs of maintaining it and keeping it up-to-date. Studies show that the annual cost averages around 2 percent of the value of the home.1 So, versus renting, buying a home provides you with an expected capital appreciation, but incurs you a ‘depreciation’ cost of around 2 percent a year. Which results in the following equilibrium between buying and renting: Mortgage rate = Rental yield + Expected house price appreciation - 2 But we can simplify this. In the long run, the price of any asset must trend in line with its income stream. Therefore, expected house price appreciation equates to expected rental growth. Also, rents move in lockstep with wages (Chart I-5). Understandably so, because rents must be paid from wages. And wage growth itself just equals consumer price inflation plus productivity growth, which averages around 1 percent (Chart I-6). Pulling all of this together, the equilibrium simplifies to: Chart I-5Rents Track Wages
Rents Track Wages
Rents Track Wages
Chart I-6Rent Inflation = Wage Inflation = Consumer Price Inflation + 1
Rent Inflation = Wage Inflation = Consumer Price Inflation + 1
Rent Inflation = Wage Inflation = Consumer Price Inflation + 1
Mortgage rate = Rental yield + Expected consumer price inflation - 1 So, here’s our first conclusion. Assuming central banks achieve their long-term inflation target of 2 percent, the equilibrium becomes: Mortgage rate = Rental yield + 1 Under this assumption, to justify the current UK rental yield of 3 percent, the UK mortgage rate must plunge to 4 percent. But given that the government has just triggered an incipient balance of payments and currency crisis, the mortgage rate is likely to head even higher. In which case the rental yield must rise to at least 4 percent. Meaning either house prices falling 25 percent, or rents rising 33 percent. Meanwhile, to justify the current US rental yield of 3.7 percent, the US mortgage rate must plunge to 4.7 percent. Alternatively, to justify the current mortgage rate of 7 percent, the rental yield must surge to 6 percent. Meaning either house prices crashing 40 percent, or rents surging 60 percent. More likely though, all variables will correct. The equilibrium between buying and renting will be re-established by some combination of lower mortgage rates, lower house prices, and higher rents. The Housing Investment Cycle Is Turning Down The relationship between buying and renting a home raises an obvious counterargument. What if central banks cannot achieve their goal of price stability? In this case, expected inflation in the equilibrium would be considerably higher than 2 percent. This would justify a much higher mortgage rate for a given rental yield. Put differently, it would justify rental yields to stay structurally low (house prices to stay structurally high), even if mortgage rates marched higher. In an inflationary environment, houses would become the perfect foils against inflation. In an inflationary environment, houses would become the perfect foils against inflation because expected rental growth would track inflation – allowing rental yields to stay depressed versus much higher mortgage rates. This is precisely what happened in the 1970s. When the US mortgage rate peaked at 18 percent in 1981, the US rental yield barely got above 6 percent (Chart I-7). Chart I-7In The Inflationary 70s, The Rental Yield Remained Well Below The Mortgage Rate...
In The Inflationary 70s, The Rental Yield Remained Well Below The Mortgage Rate...
In The Inflationary 70s, The Rental Yield Remained Well Below The Mortgage Rate...
If the market fears another such inflationary episode, would it make the housing market a good investment? In the near term, the answer is still no, for two reasons. First, even if rental yields do not track mortgage rates higher point for point, the yields do tend to move in the same direction – especially when mortgage rates surge as they did in the 1970s (Chart I-8). Some of this increase in rental yields might come from higher rents, but some of it might also come from lower house prices. Chart I-8...But Even In The 70s, The Rental Yield And Mortgage Rate Moved Directionally Together
...But Even In The 70s, The Rental Yield And Mortgage Rate Moved Directionally Together
...But Even In The 70s, The Rental Yield And Mortgage Rate Moved Directionally Together
Second, based on the US, it is a bad time in the housing investment cycle. Theoretically and empirically, residential fixed investment tracks the number of households in the economy. But there are perpetual cycles of underinvestment and overinvestment – the most spectacular being the overinvestment boom that preceded the 2007-08 housing crisis. US housing investment has just experienced a 10-year upcycle in which it has overshot its relationship with the number of households. Therefore, contrary to the popular perception, there is not an undersupply of homes, but a marked oversupply relative to the number of households. (Chart I-9). This is important because, as the cycle turns down now – as it did in 1973, 1979, 1990, and 2007 – the preceding overinvestment always weighs down housing valuations (Chart I-10). Chart I-9The US Housing Investment Cycle Has Moved Into Overinvestment
The US Housing Investment Cycle Has Moved Into Overinvestment
The US Housing Investment Cycle Has Moved Into Overinvestment
Chart I-10A Housing Investment Downcycle Always Weighs On Housing Valuations
A Housing Investment Downcycle Always Weighs On Housing Valuations
A Housing Investment Downcycle Always Weighs On Housing Valuations
The Investment Conclusions Let’s sum up. If the market believes that economies will return to price stability, then to reset the equilibrium between buying and renting a home, either mortgage rates must come down by around 150 bps, or house prices must suffer a large double-digit correction. Or some combination, such as mortgage rates down 100 bps and house prices down 10 percent. If the market believes that economies will not return to price stability, then house prices are still near-term vulnerable to rising mortgage rates – especially in the US, as a 10-year upcycle in housing investment has resulted in overinvestment relative to the number of households. US housing investment has just experienced a 10-year upcycle in which it has overshot its relationship with the number of households. Falling house prices coming hot on the heels of a combined stock and bond market crash will unleash a deflationary impulse in 2023, which will return economies to 2 percent inflation – even if the markets do not believe it now. This reiterates our ‘2022-23 = 1981-82’ template for the markets, as recently explained in Markets Still Echoing 1981-82, So Here’s What Happens Next. In summary, a coordinated global recession will cause bond prices to enter a sustained rally in 2023, in which the 30-year T-bond yield will fall to sub-2.5 percent. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 will test 3500, or even 3200, before a strong rally will lift it through 5000 later in 2023. Analysing The Pound’s Crash Through A Fractal Lens Finally, the incipient balance of payments and sterling crisis triggered by the UK government’s unfunded tax cuts has collapsed the 65-day fractal structure of the pound (Chart I-11). This would be justified if the Bank of England does not lean against the fiscal laxness with a compensating tighter monetary policy. But if, as we expect, monetary policy adjusts as a short-term counterbalance, then sterling will experience a temporary, but playable, countertrend bounce. Chart I-11The Pound Usually Turns When Its Fractal Structure Has Collapsed
The Pound Usually Turns When Its Fractal Structure Has Collapsed
The Pound Usually Turns When Its Fractal Structure Has Collapsed
On this assumption, a recommended tactical trade, with a maximum holding period of 65 days, is to go long GBP/CHF, setting a profit target and symmetrical stop-loss at 4 percent. Chart 1Hungarian Bonds Are Oversold
Hungarian Bonds Are Oversold
Hungarian Bonds Are Oversold
Chart 2Copper's Tactical Rebound Maybe Over
Copper's Tactical Rebound Maybe Over
Copper's Tactical Rebound Maybe Over
Chart 3US REITS Are Oversold Versus Utilities
US REITS Are Oversold Versus Utilities
US REITS Are Oversold Versus Utilities
Chart 4FTSE100 Outperformance Vs. Euro Stoxx 50 Is Vulnerable
FTSE100 Outperformance Vs. Euro Stoxx 50 Is Vulnerable
FTSE100 Outperformance Vs. Euro Stoxx 50 Is Vulnerable
Chart 5Netherlands' Underperformance Vs. Switzerland Has Ended
Netherlands' Underperformance Vs. Switzerland Has Ended
Netherlands' Underperformance Vs. Switzerland Has Ended
Chart 6The Sell-Off In The 30-Year T-Bond At Fractal Fragility
The Sell-Off In The 30-Year T-Bond At Fractal Fragility
The Sell-Off In The 30-Year T-Bond At Fractal Fragility
Chart 7Food And Beverage Outperformance Is Exhausted
Food And Beverage Outperformance Is Exhausted
Food And Beverage Outperformance Is Exhausted
Chart 8German Telecom Outperformance Has Started Is Fragile
German Telecom Outperformance Has Started Is Fragile
German Telecom Outperformance Has Started Is Fragile
Chart 9Japanese Telecom Outperformance Vulnerable To Reversal
Japanese Telecom Outperformance Vulnerable To Reversal
Japanese Telecom Outperformance Vulnerable To Reversal
Chart 10The Strong Trend In The 18-Month-Out US Interest Rate Future Is Fragile
The Strong Trend In The 18-Month-Out US Interest Rate Future Is Fragile
The Strong Trend In The 18-Month-Out US Interest Rate Future Is Fragile
Chart 11The Strong Downtrend In The 3 Year T-Bond Is Fragile
The Strong Downtrend In The 3 Year T-Bond Is Fragile
The Strong Downtrend In The 3 Year T-Bond Is Fragile
Chart 12The Outperformance Of Tobacco Vs. Cannabis Is Fragile
The Outperformance Of Tobacco Vs. Cannabis Is Fragile
The Outperformance Of Tobacco Vs. Cannabis Is Fragile
Chart 13Biotech Is A Major Buy
Biotech Is A Major Buy
Biotech Is A Major Buy
Chart 14Norway's Outperformance Has Ended
Norway's Outperformance Has Ended
Norway's Outperformance Has Ended
Chart 15Cotton Versus Platinum Has Reversed
Cotton Versus Platinum Has Reversed
Cotton Versus Platinum Has Reversed
Chart 16Switzerland's Outperformance Vs. Germany Is Exhausted
Switzerland's Outperformance Vs. Germany Is Exhausted
Switzerland's Outperformance Vs. Germany Is Exhausted
Chart 17USD/EUR Is Vulnerable To Reversal
USD/EUR Is Vulnerable To Reversal
USD/EUR Is Vulnerable To Reversal
Chart 18The Outperformance Of MSCI Hong Kong Versus China Has Ended
The Outperformance Of MSCI Hong Kong Versus China Has Ended
The Outperformance Of MSCI Hong Kong Versus China Has Ended
Chart 19US Utilities Outperformance Vulnerable To Reversal
US Utilities Outperformance Vulnerable To Reversal
US Utilities Outperformance Vulnerable To Reversal
Chart 20The Outperformance Of Oil Versus Banks Is Exhausted
The Outperformance Of Oil Versus Banks Is Exhausted
The Outperformance Of Oil Versus Banks Is Exhausted
Dhaval Joshi Chief Strategist dhaval@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 The Rate of Return on Everything, 1870–2015 (frbsf.org) Fractal Trading System Fractal Trades
Will Surging Mortgage Rates Crash House Prices?
Will Surging Mortgage Rates Crash House Prices?
Will Surging Mortgage Rates Crash House Prices?
Will Surging Mortgage Rates Crash House Prices?
6-12 Month Recommendations 6-12 MONTH RECOMMENDATIONS EXPIRE AFTER 15 MONTHS, IF NOT CLOSED EARLIER. Structural Recommendations Closed Fractal Trades Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Chart II-1Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Euro Area
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Euro Area
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Euro Area
Chart II-2Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Europe Ex Euro Area
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Europe Ex Euro Area
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Europe Ex Euro Area
Chart II-3Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Asia
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Asia
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Asia
Chart II-4Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Other Developed
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Other Developed
Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Other Developed
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-5Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Chart II-6Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Chart II-7Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Chart II-8Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations