Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Iran

Last month we "stuck our neck out" and reaffirmed our bullishness towards risk asset. This month, we have confirmation that the risky bet is paying off. Iran and the US remain materially constrained from total war. The AI capex thesis is holding up and slowly mutating into a price war that will only boost adoption and necessitate more investment. We open a new AI-related trade (long hard disk makers) and go long gold. 

The latest US-Iran developments are more of the same, with the conflict remaining in a “kinetic equilibrium” dictated by oil prices. The weekend once again saw back and forth between the US and Iran. Signs of de-escalation saw oil selling off, yields…
The Iran conflict remains in a “kinetic equilibrium” governed by oil prices; depleted military and energy inventories continue to constrain escalation. The weekend was quiet after several weeks of renewed tension following the US-Iran ceasefire. The level of…

Europe faces a difficult macro backdrop, but whether it slips into recession remains finely balanced. We present two perspectives before translating them into investment implications. 

The Strait of Hormuz is a unique geographical feature. Other than the Bosporus and Dardanelles Straits that allow passage between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea (via the Sea of Marmara), there are very few other such, economically valuable, choke points. What many armchair geopolitical strategists consider “critical” naval routes – Strait of Malacca, Panama Canal, Suez – are really just pathways of convenience. “Nice to haves” – in that they significantly reduce sailing times – as opposed to the “must have” that is Hormuz.

The Middle East conflict has moved beyond previously observed red lines, but our GeoMacro strategists still expect material constraints to drive de-escalation. Since the ceasefire and until this past weekend, the conflict had largely been characterized by…

In our last update on the Iran-US conflict, we noted that both sides in the conflict (all three, if we include Israel) were “coloring inside the lines.” By that we meant that they were abiding by the “red lines” of kinetic activity established in the heat of the first iteration of the Iran conflict. Specifically, we noted that investors should watch carefully for any sign that attacks were spreading beyond military facilities. 

We stick to the view that geopolitical risk has peaked. The US and Iran tensions will increase oil prices, but below a level that will matter for the market. With global liquidity ample, private sector leverage low, and inflation peaking, bears are holding onto an epic collapse of the AI capex to short stocks. Eventually, the capex cycle will end in tears. That much history teaches us. But not yet. 

The Middle East situation escalated again over the weekend, but the conflict remains in a range shaped by oil prices. The immediate issue is a dispute over shipping routes through Hormuz. Iran appears to believe the June ceasefire effectively gave it the…

The US and Iran have engaged in a dramatic increase in kinetic activity over the past several days. It all appears to have started on July 6-7, when Iran allegedly attacked several ships in the Strait of Hormuz, vessels that were using the US-recommended route closer to Oman. Following US strikes against Iran in retaliation for that incident – with the US military claiming to have struck 140 sites – Iran has retaliated against US military facilities across the Gulf region. According to media reporting and Iranian government sources themselves, Iran attacked Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar and Oman on July 11-12. 

Iran Conflict Daily Dashboard

Real-time charts on the Iran Conflict

View Dashboard

Related Topics